Comparison Of Hydro-Climatologic Data Of Berkeley, Californi

Comparison of Hydro-Climatologic Data of Berkeley, California and Terre Haute, Indiana

This assignment requires a comprehensive analysis of the hydro-climatic differences between Berkeley, California, and Terre Haute, Indiana, by examining their water budgets, climate characteristics, and the implications of their geographic and environmental contexts.

First, it is essential to understand the concept of a water budget and the processes involved, such as precipitation (P), potential evapotranspiration (PE), actual evapotranspiration (AE), storage change (ΔST), and the stages of surplus, usage, deficit, and recharge. The initial step involves calculating the net water input (P - PE) for both locations, which indicates whether an area is gaining or losing water in a given month.

In the case of Berkeley, with its Mediterranean climate characterized by wet winters and dry summers, the water budget demonstrates a pattern where surplus predominates during the winter months due to higher precipitation and lower evaporative demand. The data reflect a consistent soil storage capacity at or near field capacity (10 cm) during winter, with surplus causing water accumulation in the soil. The spring months transition into water utilization, where the stored water is consumed as plants transpire and evaporation surpasses precipitation, leading to a decline in soil moisture. Summer months record a notable deficit, with minimal precipitation and heightened evapotranspiration rates, resulting in decreased soil storage and sometimes reaching zero, indicating dry conditions.

Conversely, in Terre Haute, Indiana, with its humid continental climate featuring a peak of precipitation in summer, the water budget exhibits a different cycle. Here, summer months often show surplus due to elevated precipitation and relatively moderate evapotranspiration, leading to soil moisture recharge and maintained or increased storage levels at field capacity. Autumn months witness the recharge phase, with water being added to the soil as temperatures decline and evapotranspiration reduces. Winters in Terre Haute tend to be drier, but the soil generally retains moisture due to cooler temperatures and snow accumulation, which serves as a form of water storage. The seasonal variation in water patterns is stark, reflecting the region's climatic tendencies of high summer rainfall and less pronounced winter precipitation.

The primary reasons for these differences lie in their geographic and climatic settings. Berkeley's Mediterranean climate results from its proximity to the Pacific Ocean, mountain barriers, and the influence of oceanic air masses, which produce wet winters and dry summers. Its relative altitude and topography limit summer moisture availability, and its coastal position favors maritime moderation. In contrast, Terre Haute's continental climate is influenced by its inland position, distance from maritime moistures, and prevailing westerly winds that carry moist air from the Gulf of Mexico, resulting in a summer peak of precipitation. Its topography and elevation, being more flat and inland, facilitate the seasonal alternation of high and low water availability based on regional weather patterns.

Furthermore, the difference in the atmospheric conditions, such as temperature and humidity, contributes significantly to the evapotranspiration rates and soil moisture dynamics. Berkeley's milder, wetter winters result in lower PE, minimizing water stress during that period, while summer evapotranspiration rates spike due to increased temperatures. Terre Haute experiences high precipitation during summer, reducing water deficits and maintaining soil moisture, whereas its winter months see a decline in rainfall but preserved soil moisture through snow and temperature moderation.

In conclusion, the contrasting water budgets and climate characteristics of Berkeley and Terre Haute are rooted in their distinct geographic situations—coastal vs. inland—and their respective climatic regimes—Mediterranean vs. continental. These differences manifest in their seasonal water surplus, usage, deficit, and recharge cycles, emphasizing the relationship between climate, topography, and hydrological processes. Understanding these mechanisms is vital for effective water resource management, especially under changing climatic conditions which may alter these natural cycles.

References

• Brutsaert, W. (1982). Hydrology: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
• Dettinger, M. D., Cayan, D. R., Hayhoe, K., & Jager, J. M. (2011). Climate change and water resources in California. Earth’s Future, 1(1), 17-35.
• Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water and climate change: A preliminary review. Water International, 18(2), 51-62.
• Houghton, J. T., et al. (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. IPCC.
• Ma, Z., & Bou-Zeid, E. (2018). Co-designing urban water management considering climate variability and urbanization trends. Water Resources Research, 54(6), 4218-4234.
• Melillo, J. M., Richmond, T. C., & Yohe, G. W. (2014). Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program.
• Shuttleworth, W. J. (1993). Evaporation and soil moisture. John Wiley & Sons.
• US Geological Survey (USGS). (n.d.). Water budgets and hydrologic cycle data. Retrieved from https://water.usgs.gov
• Wilby, R. L. (2009). Water resource adaptations to climate change in the UK. Weather, Climate, and Society, 1(4), 279-288.
• Wigley, T. M. L. (2005). The climate change commitment. Science, 307(5716), 1766-1769.