Comparison Of Parenting Ideas By Amy C

Comparison Contrast Essay On The Ideas Of Parenting Of Amy Chua And O

Comparison-Contrast Essay on the Ideas of Parenting of Amy Chua and Of Hanna Rosin By John Stud Parenting styles differ across the globe and in personal aspect of culture and traditions. What seems acceptable by some parents in equal measures may be considered backward and wrong. Each parent has expectations for their kids, and this is the driving force that dictates how they raise their children, all of them want nothing but the very best for the children. This work will take a deep scope in uncovering and analyzing the conflicting ideas of western mothers and Chinese mothers. Amy Chua, a professor and an author emphasizes the superiority of the parenting skills mothers from China exercise while in contrast, Hanna Rosin disputes the same parenting skills explicitly stating that the end product is of more importance and Chinese mothers overlook the impact of happiness on a child’s life (Rosin, 2011).

The first difference in parenting between Chinese and Western mothers is contrasting opinion on success based on the role that success plays in one’s life. Hanna Rosin’s opinion on the significance of a child’s success sharply differs from that of Amy Chua. Hanna categorically states that success will not make you happy, but rather children have to find their happiness through achievement in the thing that they have interested (Rosin, 2011). Hanna upholds the importance of a moderate but happy and satisfied child at the expense of a high achiever whose life is faced with challenges leading to depression. On the other hand, Chua advocates for drilling success at all expenses, she believes that Chinese moms are better parents because of their constant pressure they expose to children from very young ages.

Room for freedom is not allowed, and children are considered as indebted to their parents (Chua, 2011). She believes that children should not be good at what they do but rather be the very best in whatever they set on doing. No room for average success is allowed as children are considered a reflection of what their respective parent. Chua also states that success comes from mastery and constant practice hence involving your child in master studying, long hours of practicing the violin, and rote repetition enhances chances of raising an intelligent and sharp skilled minded kid. However, western mothers underrate stressing academic achievement as long as the child does his or her best there is room for improvement.

An example of a child who brings home an A minus grade in a Chinese setting will be considered a failure while a child from an American setting will be showered with praises. Another difference is with respect to the significance of constricted rules. Chua firmly holds that mothers must be directed toward a child in a particular path. Subsequently, such a child will never deviate from it. Therefore, this is the major ideology that Chua recommends for parents.

She considers this as one of the major setbacks that western parents encounter because they leave most of the decision to be made by children without strict and close follow-up. The Western children, according to Chua, are thus left free to undertake decision according to their preferences without such preference being overridden by their mothers as Chua recommends. Therefore, Chua strongly argues that happiness is derived from mastery, and hence Chinese mothers hold that there is nothing fun until one is good at it. Therefore, unlike Western mothers who just want an average achievement for their children, Chua indicates that children not only need to be good at whatever they undertake but also the children must be better than everyone else.

Therefore, Chinese women understand that children must be shown whatever to do as the children themselves do not endorse hard work on their individual capacity due to the existence of superegos coupled with mad drive to succeed (Chua, 2011). However, Rosin disputes this by showcasing that Western mothers are better as compared to Chinese mothers who do not wait for the children to showcase their talents and interest in activity prior to exerting some restriction and direction to advance it through the day. The Western children must, therefore, be left their interest and become experts’ flutist. Thus, Amy Chua primarily focuses the differences between Western and Chinese mothers to depict the greatness of Chinese mothers.

Thus, Amy Chua employs several techniques that are effective content incorporating both examples and unique writing styles based on a powerful tone. Thus, Amy Chua highlights three main differences between them just as Chua explicates in her article. For instance, one of the key differences is that Western mothers care greatly about their children pride that determines the words they employ in conversing with their respective children as they anticipate less than Chinese parents. The next difference is with respect to long time traditional thinking particularly the depth of children to their parents as mothers offer their children the forms of lives (Chua, 2011). Ultimately, Amy Chua highlights another difference where Chinese mothers understand their children more deeply as compared to Western mothers.

All these are explicated through Chua’s own memoir with Lulu, her daughter. For example, Chua indicates how their children are outperforming their Western counterparts in academics as their mother’s orders for an A grade whereas western mothers just encourage theirs to do their best. Subsequently, we see how she explains what Lulu can and cannot do especially in respect to music; Lulu can play Violin and Piano which takes western children several years to practice hence showcasing the superiority of Chinese mothers in parenting. In conclusion, Tiger Mother Amy Chua and why Chinese Mothers are Superior showcases the truthfulness of the manners in which parents raise their children decides how well the children grow.

Notably, the mothers who impact their children the most must design and implement particular ways of parenting. The level of intensity of parenting distinguishes how the mothers raise their respective children. As explicated by Amy Chua, Chinese mothers adopt a superior way in raising their children. On the other hand, as Hanna Rosin explicates the inferiority of the Chinese mothers in an attempt to defend her mode of parenting. Subsequently, Hanna Rosin’s article entails excellent anecdotes putting her in a position that effectively assist her defend her strategies of parenting.

The ‘Kitty Kat’ anecdote, as referred by Hanna's 2-year-old son as he acted out of 'tiger', depicts Hanna’s position amongst other parents in the benchmarks outlined by Chua. Nonetheless, such a strategy never breaks Rosin as a parent either does it cause Hanna to rethink what she does to her children. Conversely, Hanna defends herself through a criticism of Ms. Chua’s mode of parenting (Rosin, 2011). Thus, Rosin exemplifies her children’s upbringing via spontaneity, freedom, discover as well as experience.

In my opinion, the Chinese mothers are superior in parenting as compared to Western mothers as showcased in the discussion. References Chua, A. (2011). Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior : Can a regimen of no playdates, no TV, no computer games and hours of music practice create happy kids? And what happens when they fight back? The Wall Street Journal , 1-2. Rosin, H. (2011). Mother Inferior ? Amy Chua has the diagnosis of American childhood exactly backward. Our kids don't need more drills and rules. They need to lighten up and roam free. The Wall Street Journal , 1-2. Check formatting against example See comments on discussion board post More specific to Chua and Rosin Stick to last names Great place to use a quotation for support Good transition marker Again, balance paraphrasing with quotations Try to vary up your word choices. You have three “Therefore’s’ in about three sentences. You’ve had solid organization up to this point. What is the point of this paragraph? Make that clear in the topic sentence. You may find you need more than one paragraph to cover all this in an organized way. Again, lots of “thus” now Put titles of articles in quotation marks

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The debate over parenting styles in different cultural contexts has long been a subject of academic and social discussion. Particularly, contrasting Western and Chinese parenting philosophies reveal fundamental differences in how success, freedom, and discipline are valued and implemented. Amy Chua's perspective, articulated in her memoir and articles, advocates for strict, mastery-oriented parenting rooted in tradition and cultural values. Conversely, Hanna Rosin emphasizes a more relaxed, child-centered approach prioritizing happiness and individual interests. This essay explores the differences and implications of these contrasting parenting ideas, assessing their effects on children's development and societal outcomes.

At the core of the debate is the notion of success. Amy Chua’s philosophy emphasizes rigorous discipline and high achievement as essential for cultivating competent and competitive children. She advocates for a parenting style where children are engaged in long hours of practice and mastery, often at the expense of leisure or personal enjoyment. For instance, Chua argues that Chinese children, under her style of parenting, outperform their Western counterparts academically and artistically because of the structured environment and relentless drive (Chua, 2011). In contrast, Hanna Rosin questions the emphasis on achievement, asserting that success does not necessarily equate to happiness. Rosin contends that children should be encouraged to pursue activities that foster their interests and joy, which ultimately leads to a more fulfilled and balanced life (Rosin, 2011). This fundamental divergence reflects differing cultural priorities: one valuing external achievement and mastery, the other valuing internal satisfaction and well-being.

Discipline and rules constitute another major point of divergence. Chua asserts that strict rules and high expectations are necessary to guide children toward success, emphasizing that Chinese mothers are more controlling to ensure children stay on a predetermined path. She criticizes Western parenting for its permissiveness, which she believes allows children too much freedom, risking deviation from societal norms and goals. Chua’s approach involves constant oversight, limited leisure, and pushing children to excel in academics and arts. Conversely, Rosin advocates for a parenting style that fosters independence and spontaneous discovery. She recounts anecdotes where Western children are encouraged to explore their interests freely, resulting in more creative and emotionally balanced individuals. Rosin’s perspective suggests that excessive control can stifle personal growth and intrinsic motivation, which are crucial for long-term happiness and societal adaptability (Rosin, 2011).

The cultural implications of these differing approaches are profound. Chua’s parenting style reflects a collectivist culture rooted in Confucian values, emphasizing discipline, hierarchy, and the importance of societal contribution. The Chinese method aims to produce children who excel academically and professionally, thereby contributing to societal progress. In contrast, Western parenting emphasizes individualism, personal happiness, and self-expression, aligned with liberal democratic values. These differences influence not only children's development but also societal structures, shaping future generations’ priorities and behaviors (Hofstede, 2001). While strict parenting may lead to high academic achievement, it can also be associated with increased stress and burnout among children. Conversely, permissive parenting may foster creativity and emotional intelligence but risk underachievement or lack of discipline.

Research underscores the effectiveness and drawbacks of both approaches. Studies have shown that authoritarian, mastery-focused parenting correlates with high academic success but also with higher anxiety levels among children (Bornstein et al., 2012). On the other hand, authoritative and permissive styles are linked to better emotional well-being but sometimes less academic diligence (Baumrind, 1991). These findings highlight that a balanced approach, incorporating elements of both styles, may be most beneficial. Educational and psychological research suggests that adaptive parenting strategies tailored to individual children’s needs lead to optimal development outcomes (Spera, 2005).

Overall, the contrasting ideas of Amy Chua and Hanna Rosin exemplify the broader cultural values that shape parenting practices. While Chua’s strict regimen may produce high-achieving children, it can also induce stress and diminish intrinsic motivation. Rosin’s relaxed approach fosters emotional health and independence but may sacrifice academic rigor. Ultimately, the debate underscores the importance of context-sensitive parenting, which combines discipline with affection and freedom with guidance. Recognizing the strengths and limitations of each style allows parents and policymakers to craft strategies that support children’s holistic development, balancing competence with happiness and resilience.

References

• Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.
• Bornstein, M. H., et al. (2012). Parenting and Development in Cross-Cultural Contexts. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 113-119.
• Chua, A. (2011). Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior: Can a regimen of no playdates, no TV, no computer games and hours of music practice create happy kids? And what happens when they fight back? The Wall Street Journal.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications.
• Rosin, H. (2011). Mother Inferior? Amy Chua has the diagnosis of American childhood exactly backward. Our kids don't need more drills and rules. They need to lighten up and roam free. The Wall Street Journal.
• Spera, M. J. (2005). A review of 40 years of parental influence on children's academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 375-402.