Complete A Quality Plan Analysis Of A Failed Project

Complete A Quality Plan Analysis Of A Failed Project And A New Quality

Complete a quality plan analysis of a failed project and a new quality assurance plan for the turnaround project. This portfolio work project, quality analysis and assurance evaluation, is based on your selected business or IT project. You will base your assessment on the Revive LLC case study for the development of a new online employee orientation module. Both human resource (HR) and information technology (IT) employees, as well as contractors, will be utilized in this project.

Project quality management is defined as a methodology that includes the processes for incorporating the organizations' quality policy regarding planning, managing, and controlling project and product quality requirements, in order to meet stakeholders' expectations (Project Management Institute, 2017, p. 717). The quality management plan describes how the project team will implement quality policies to meet project requirements and satisfy the customers' needs and expectations. A project plan usually includes a quality statement. This document deals with quality planning, quality assurance, and quality control through testing and continuous improvement of the project processes and the project deliverables. If the organization has a Project Management Office (PMO) and IT governance, a project needs to follow the basic framework and structure specified for all IT-related activities and projects in that organization.

Since quality planning is one of the key facilitating processes in the project planning process, it must be performed as planned and in parallel with other planning processes. The term quality can assume different meanings, depending on the circumstances in which it is applied. For example, as a customer, your quality requirements may be different from that of the product or service provider (PMI, 2017). This analysis will examine the causes of failure in the previous project, identify gaps in the initial quality plan, and propose a comprehensive new quality assurance plan that aligns with organizational standards and stakeholder expectations for the turnaround project. The focus will be on establishing effective quality metrics, assurance activities, and continuous improvement strategies tailored for the development of the employee orientation module following the case study context.

Paper For Above instruction

The success of any project heavily depends on effective quality management. Analyzing a failed project provides invaluable insights into weaknesses and gaps in the original quality plan, which can be addressed to improve outcomes in future initiatives. This paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of a previously failed project—the development of a new online employee orientation module for Revive LLC—and proposes a refined quality assurance plan aimed at ensuring project success in the turnaround effort.

Analysis of the Failed Project

The initial project faced multiple issues, primarily stemming from inadequate planning, unclear quality standards, and misaligned stakeholder expectations. One of the critical shortcomings was the absence of a detailed quality management plan that integrated all stakeholder requirements from the outset. This led to frequent rework, delays, and ultimately, failure to meet the project’s objectives. It appeared that quality metrics were poorly defined, and quality assurance activities were reactive rather than proactive, resulting in a product that did not fully satisfy user needs or organizational standards.

Furthermore, communication gaps among project team members, contractors, and stakeholders exacerbated these issues. The lack of a robust feedback loop meant that errors and deviations from quality standards were not detected early, leading to compounded issues downstream. The project scope was also not adequately controlled or documented, causing scope creep, which further strained resources and compromised quality. The failure to establish clear quality benchmarks and continuous monitoring led to a final deliverable that was subpar and unsatisfactory for the client’s requirements.

Root Causes and Lessons Learned

The root causes of the project’s failure can be traced to insufficient quality planning, lack of stakeholder engagement, and poor communication management. The organization did not allocate enough resources for quality assurance activities, nor did it set measurable quality objectives aligned with stakeholder expectations. This oversight underscores the importance of integrating quality planning into the overall project planning process. Additionally, the absence of continuous quality improvement mechanisms hindered the project team’s ability to adapt and rectify issues promptly.

Lesson learned indicates that comprehensive quality planning, early stakeholder involvement, and ongoing performance measurement are critical to project success. Aligning quality standards with organizational policies and industry best practices fosters consistency and confidence among all project participants. Addressing these deficiencies necessitates developing a new, well-structured quality assurance plan tailored to the context of the turnaround project.

Proposed New Quality Assurance Plan

The revised quality assurance plan will commence with stakeholder analysis to identify and document explicit quality requirements. Certified quality standards such as ISO 9001 and IT-specific guidelines like ITIL will serve as benchmarks to ensure compliance and best practices. Clear quality objectives for the online employee orientation module include usability, accuracy, accessibility, and engagement.

Quality metrics will be defined to measure key performance indicators such as user satisfaction scores, defect rates during testing, and compliance with accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG). Regular quality audits, peer reviews, and testing phases will be embedded within the project lifecycle to detect deviations early. The plan emphasizes proactive quality assurance activities, including process audits, risk assessments, and continuous feedback loops involving HR, IT professionals, and end-users.

Furthermore, the plan incorporates continuous improvement strategies. Post-implementation reviews, lessons learned sessions, and performance dashboards will track quality outcomes and inform adjustments. Training and certification for team members on quality management principles will foster a culture of quality throughout the project lifecycle, minimizing risks of rework and delays.

Conclusion

Effective quality management is instrumental in turning around failing projects. By analyzing the shortcomings of the previous project, organizations can develop targeted strategies to enhance quality planning, assurance, and control mechanisms. The proposed new quality assurance plan for the Revive LLC online employee orientation module emphasizes stakeholder engagement, clear quality metrics, proactive assurance activities, and continuous improvement. Implementing such a plan will significantly increase the likelihood of project success, stakeholder satisfaction, and organizational growth.

References

• Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) — Sixth Edition. PMI.
• ISO. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems. International Organization for Standardization.
• ITIL Foundation. (2019). ITIL 4 Edition. AXELOS.
• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Levine, H. A. (2016). The Power of Quality: Achieving Total Quality Management. Pearson.
• Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1999). Juran's Quality Handbook. McGraw-Hill.
• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. MIT Press.
• Oakland, J. S. (2014). Total Quality Management and Operational Excellence. Routledge.
• ISO. (2020). ISO/IEC 27001:2020 Information Security Management. International Organization for Standardization.