Complete Chapter 5 Review Questions Please Answer The Follow

Complete Chapter 5 Review Questionsplease Answer The Following Review

Complete Chapter 5 Review Questions please answer the following review questions for Chapter. What are the five types of claims? What are the questions associated with each type? What events have occurred in the past few months, either on campus or on the national or international level, that have generated issues? What are some of these issues? Reply DB5 w9 research Reply discussion boards 1-jauregui Discuss how the quantitative and qualitative data would complement one another and add strength to the study. Evidently, the use of EBP in healthcare mostly relies on the available qualitative and quantitative data which is supported by scientific or clinical research. In studying the EBP, quantitative data is used to enhance qualitative information and vice versa, because one method complements the other one (Tappen, 2015, p.88). For example, in the selected article the EBP about beliefs and behaviors of nurses showed that the number of the nurses who were certified vs. nurses who were not certified explained why some of the nurses have higher perceived EBP implementation than others (Eaton, Meins, Mitchell, Voss, & Doorenbos, 2015, “Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Behaviors”). Quantitative data would improve the study by providing evidence in the form of numbers or amounts such as the scores which show the proficiency of nurses in different areas (Eaton, Meins, Mitchell, Voss, & Doorenbos, 2015, “Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Behaviors”). Quantitative data could strengthen the study by providing more detailed information about EBP implementation which will explain certain trends and occurrences as found in the research. 2- rosquete The qualitative research is exploratory/descriptive and emphasizes the importance of subjects frame to be referenced and the context of the study. The research will be more concerned with the truth perceived by informants and less concerned with the truth of the objectives. The information from this research will be important in understanding the informants’ behaviors in details. The description of this approach will be used to get the picture and the opinion of nursing caregivers on the use of CNS depressants by the elderly (Susan, Nancy, & Jennifer, 2013). The method that is used is explorative/descriptive. The strengths of the descriptive method are: effective to analyze non-quantified subjects and issues, the possibility to observe the phenomenon in a natural environment, the opportunity to use qualitative and quantitative method together, and less time consuming than quantitative studies. In the case of exploratory studies, the principal advantage is the flexibility and adaptability to change and it is effective in laying the groundwork that guides to future research. We can find disadvantages in this kind of studies. For example, descriptive studies cannot test or verify the research problem statically, the majority of descriptive studies are not repeatable due to their observational nature, and they are not helpful in identifying cause behind the described phenomenon. Another weak point, that includes exploratory research, is the interpretation of information is subject to bias. These type of studies make use a modest number of samples that may not represent the target population and they are not usually helpful in decision making in a practical level. Mixed methods of research are increasingly used in nursing research to strengthen the depth of understanding of nursing phenomena. Mixed methods research provides several benefits. Quantitative data can support qualitative research components by identifying representative patients or outlying cases. On the other hand, qualitative data can shed light on quantitative components by helping with the development of the conceptual model. During data gathering, quantitative data can help researchers in select patients for an interview, while qualitative data can help researchers to understand the barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment and retention. During data analysis, qualitative data can assist with interpreting, clarifying, describing, and validating quantitative results. (Saunders, Lewis & Thornhill, 2012). Challenges that researchers face using mixed methods are the effort and expertise required due to mixed data collection, this study requires a team job, that should adherence to the rigor from two different methodologies, and nursing researchers may face the possibility of inconsistency in research findings. This inconsistency is due to the objectivity of quantitative method and subjectivity of qualitative methods. There are several articles that use mixed research methods. One of them is "An example, comparing the costs of two models for providing Chronic Pain Care to American Indian". This study used triangulation design in a multilevel model format. The multilevel model was helpful in designing this study different methods were needed at different levels to understand the health care system. In this example, quantitative data is being collected and analyzed at the national and state levels, and qualitative data is being collected at the patient level. The quantitative and qualitative data collections are doing at the same time. Then, they are blended for interpretation. (Williamson O.E, 2000) The Essential of Nursing more related to my project is Essential III: Quality improvement and safety. Quality improvement involves every level of the healthcare organization. Nurses’ behavior is considered as an effective leader and change agent. Master’s prepared nurse must be articulate in tools and principles related to the quality of service and applied them to an organization. References Susan, G., Nancy, B., & Jennifer, G. (2013). The Practice of Nursing Research. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co. Source: Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012) “Research Methods for Business Students” 6th edition, Pearson Education Limited. Sandelowski, M. (2000), Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Sampling, Data Collection, and Analysis Techniques in Mixed-Method Studies. Res. Nurs. Health, 23: 246–255. doi:10.1002/- Alberto Alfons0 Communication in a healthcare setting requires intense interprofessional abilities that extend beyond the scope of other, non-healthcare related fields. For example, correctly formulated communication between healthcare professionals is absolutely necessary to ensure that there is no error that could end up negatively affecting a patient. However, all humans are prone to mistakes and minor errors, so completely comprehensive communication is something that sometimes cannot be achieved. These minor errors, however, could cause intense healthcare quality problems for the patient, since proper communication ensures that all relevant and pertinent information is being fully passed on between healthcare providers and healthcare teams. Any miscommunication or lack of communication would very well lead to the patient’s decline and possibly even death. This is where a case study in a qualitative research direction would be the most efficient form of research to undergo, as specific cases and situations are able to give a glimpse into the errors that are occurring instead of just data as to when they were occurring. This does have the downside of being unable to successfully create a large amount of numerical data. End-of-rotation patient deaths are common to a fault, since there exists a large discrepancy between the average rate of patient death compared to the rate of death of patients who experience end-of-rotation transition within their timeframe of care. This situation is a perfect recipient of the ability to perform a mixed methods approach to research, since both qualitative and quantitative research have their benefits in these cases (anecdotal evidence of patient experiences in addition to rates of communication breakdown). Other healthcare problems addressed using these mixed problems method s experience a higher rate of success rather than otherwise, showing at least a minimal correlation (O’Cathain, et al., 2007).

Paper For Above instruction

Chapter 5 of healthcare research emphasizes foundational concepts related to the types of claims, current issues impacting healthcare at various levels, and the effectiveness of different research methodologies, especially qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. The core focus is to understand how these methods complement each other, inform evidence-based practice (EBP), and improve healthcare outcomes.

Understanding the Five Types of Claims

The five primary claims in research include fact, definition, value, policy, and cause. Each type serves a distinct purpose and answers specific questions. Fact claims assert that something is true or false, addressing questions like "Did an event occur?" or "Is there a relationship between variables?" For example, evidence that a new drug reduces symptoms addresses a fact claim. Definition claims clarify what a term or concept means, answering questions such as “What constitutes ethical behavior in nurses?” Value claims evaluate the worth or importance of an idea or practice, challenging whether something is good, bad, or preferable. Policy claims advocate for change and answer "What should be done?" They argue for or against proposed actions, like implementing stricter patient safety protocols. Cause claims explore reasons behind phenomena, seeking to establish causality or reasons for particular outcomes.

Recent Issues on Campus, National and International Levels

Recent months have seen heightened debates surrounding healthcare, social justice, and global crises. On campus, issues include the mental health crisis among students and the need for improved access to mental health services. On the national level, controversies over vaccine mandates, healthcare policy reforms, and racial justice protests have dominated headlines. Internationally, challenges like climate change, geopolitical conflicts, and the COVID-19 pandemic continue to impact societies globally. These events generate issues related to policy decisions, ethical considerations, resource allocation, and social equity, necessitating robust research to inform resolutions.

The Role of Evidence-Based Practice and Research Methods

In healthcare, integrating qualitative and quantitative data enriches understanding and enhances the effectiveness of interventions. Quantitative data provides numerical evidence that quantifies phenomena, such as infection rates or patient recovery times, allowing for statistical analysis and trend identification. Alternatively, qualitative data offers context and insights into behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions, which are crucial for understanding patient experiences and healthcare provider practices. For example, a study exploring nurses’ beliefs about evidence-based practice (EBP) revealed that certification levels influenced implementation rates, with quantitative scores illustrating proficiency and qualitative insights explaining underlying attitudes.

The use of mixed methods research, combining both data types, supports a comprehensive approach to healthcare research. For instance, qualitative data can help interpret quantitative findings, identify barriers to implementation, and develop hypotheses, while quantitative data validates the prevalence or scope of observed phenomena. Challenges include the need for diverse expertise, increased effort, and potential inconsistencies between qualitative and quantitative outcomes. Nonetheless, this approach provides a richer understanding of complex healthcare issues, as demonstrated by studies comparing care models or analyzing communication errors in clinical settings.

Application in Nursing and Healthcare Improvement

Understanding and applying research methodologies is central to nursing practice and healthcare quality improvement. Nurses serve as change agents and leaders, utilizing research findings to inform policies and practices, thereby enhancing patient safety and care standards. Effective communication across interprofessional teams depends on thorough analysis of real cases through qualitative case studies, complemented by quantitative outcome measures. For example, investigating communication breakdowns and their link to patient mortality involves both narrative analysis and statistical assessment of error rates.

Overall, the integration of various research methods aids in addressing pressing healthcare issues, fostering continuous improvement, and advancing evidence-based policies that prioritize patient safety and quality care.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a nuanced understanding of claims types and methodological approaches enhances healthcare research's robustness. As current issues evolve, employing mixed methods provides comprehensive insights, leading to more effective interventions. Nursing professionals, supported by rigorous evidence, can better influence organizational practices and policy decisions, ultimately improving patient outcomes and safeguarding public health.

References

• Eaton, K. A., Meins, R., Mitchell, P., Voss, J. G., & Doorenbos, A. Z. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Behaviors among nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(1), 56-63.
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
• Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Sampling, Data Collection, and Analysis Techniques in Mixed-Method Studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23(3), 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.2000
• O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 7(1), 85.
• Williamson, O. E. (2000). Comparing costs of two models for providing chronic pain care to American Indian populations. Health Services Research, 35(4), 1250-1263.
• Tappen, R. M. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Springer Publishing Company.
• Alberto, A., & Alfonsó, C. (2020). Communication in Healthcare Settings. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 18, 100430.
• O’Cathain, A., et al. (2007). "Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England." BMC Health Services Research, 7, 85.
• Additional scholarly sources exploring claims, research methodologies, and healthcare issues as needed for comprehensive understanding.