Complete The Following Problems 1 Explain The Result After T ✓ Solved

Complete The Following Problems1 Explain The Result After The Execut

Complete The Following Problems1 Explain The Result After The Execut

Explain the expected result in the W register after executing the following instructions, assuming that the BSR (Bank Select Register) holds the value 01H. Analyze the effect of the instructions, including register contents and flags affected after execution. Address the specific instructions: MOVLW 0xF7, MOVWF 0x32, and subsequent questions regarding ADDLW and other code snippets involving PIC18 IDE simulation, and their impact on memory, registers, and status flags.

Stay attentive to the sequence of instructions, how the W register changes through loading immediate values, addition operations, and the effects on flags such as Zero (Z), Carry (C), Digit Carry (DC), and Overflow (OV). Examine how the program behaves when executed step-by-step, noting the contents of registers like REG2, REG0, REG1, REG3, and REG10, along with the status register after each operation. Also, consider the implications of conditional branching instructions like BNOV and how they influence program flow and register values.

Further, analyze specific code segments involving subtraction (SUBLW), addition (ADDLW), and conditional logic related to overflow states. For each, provide the expected content of the W register after execution, identify which flags are set, and describe the observable contents of the STATUS register. Evaluate how such assembly instructions, when assembled using MPLAB IDE and executed in single-step mode, replicate expected logical operations and flag states. Finally, interpret the overall impact of these instructions on register values and the program logic when tackling simulated microcontroller tasks, particularly in the context of handling data bytes, overflow detection, and conditional storage operation.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the operation of PIC18 assembly instructions is fundamental for embedded systems programming and debugging. When analyzing specific instructions, such as MOVLW, ADDLW, SUBLW, and their effect on the W register and status flags, it is essential to comprehend the underlying hardware logic and how instruction execution influences program flow and data manipulation.

Starting with the initial scenario where the BSR holds 01H, executing MOVLW 0xF7 loads the hexadecimal value 0xF7 into the W register. This immediate value, 0xF7, in binary (11110111) is significant because the high nibble (1111) indicates a negative number in two's complement representation, and the low nibble (0111) may influence certain flag states such as Carry and Digit Carry during subsequent additions or subtractions.

Next, executing MOVWF 0x32 stores this value into memory location 0x32, affecting the file register specified. This operation stores the current W register value into a specific RAM location, which can then be used for further operations or comparisons. The BSR, indicating the current bank, plays a role here in addressing memory locations correctly, especially in banked architectures like PIC18.

Analyzing addition operations, for example, ADDLW 0x89, involves adding the immediate value 0x89 to the current W register content. If the W register initially contains 0xF7, then the sum would be 0xF7 + 0x89 = 0x17E in hexadecimal, which exceeds 8 bits. The PIC microcontroller's addition affects the Carry flag, the Zero flag, and potentially the Overflow flag depending on the signedness and carry behavior.

When executing ADDLW 0x, it is critical to recognize the expected W register content after the addition. For instance, if the sum exceeds 0xFF, the W register typically holds the lower 8 bits, and the Carry flag is set to indicate overflow beyond 8 bits. The Zero flag is set only if the result is zero, which, in this case, would not occur. The Overflow flag is set if the signed result exceeds the range, especially relevant when adding signed numbers.

Similarly, examining the instructions involving memory locations, such as MOVLW 0xFA, and subsequent ADDLW operations, requires evaluating the result based on initial register contents and immediate values. Observing the flags—Zero (Z), Carry (C), Negative (N), and Overflow (OV)—provides insight into how the operation affects flow control, error detection, and conditional branching.

Simulating the code in MPLAB IDE allows step-by-step execution, monitoring the W register and memory contents after each instruction. For example, when performing addition, if the sum causes overflow, setting or clearing specific flags influences subsequent instructions like BNOV (Branch if No Overflow), which determines whether to skip or execute certain code blocks, impacting overall program behavior.

In assembly logic where conditional jumps are used, accurately predicting the effect of overflow, negative, zero, or carry flags—by inspecting the STATUS register during debugging—is critical in verifying system correctness. For example, after an addition involving 0x67 and 0x33, the W register should hold 0x9A. Analyzing which flags are set informs about the operation's signedness and potential branching decisions.

Further, handling subtraction using SUBLW 0x33 with an initial W value involves determining the result, setting the appropriate flags, and verifying the expected W value throughout process debugging. The combination of addition and subtraction, together with conditional flags-based branching, forms the backbone of control flow management in PIC assembly programming.

Finally, when assembling and debugging larger programs, such as the one that adds two data bytes and conditionally clears a register if an overflow occurs, it is essential to verify the sum, status register content, and resulting register values. This rigorous analysis ensures program correctness, safety, and reliability, especially when dealing with critical data manipulations, as in healthcare devices or communication modules.

References

  • Lee, A., Grana, R., & Glantz, S. (2014). Electronic cigarette use among Korean adolescents: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 54, 445-452.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Notes from the field: Electronic cigarette use among middle and high school students—United States, 2011–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 62(35), 729–730.
  • H.R. 1256, 111th Congress. (2009). Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/1256
  • Goldman, T. R. (2014). Health policy brief: E-cigarettes and federal regulations. Health Affairs, 33(9), 1550-1551.
  • Gostin, L. O., & Glasner, A. Y. (2014). E-cigarettes, vaping, and youth. JAMA, 312(6), 585–586.
  • England, L. J., Bunnell, R. E., Pechacek, T. F., Tong, V. T., & MacAfee, T. A. (2015). Nicotine and the developing human: A neglected element in the electronic cigarette debate. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(2), 286-293.
  • Hanewinkel, R., & Isensee, B. (2015). Risk factors for e-cigarette, conventional cigarette, and dual use in German adolescents: A cohort study. Preventive Medicine, 74, 59-62.
  • Lee, A., Grana, R., & Glantz, S. (2014). Electronic cigarette use among Korean adolescents: A cross-sectional study of market penetration, dual use, and relationship to quit attempts and former smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(4), 445-452.
  • S. 142, 114th Congress. (2015). Child Nicotine Prevention Poisoning Act. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/142
  • H.R. 1375, 114th Congress. (2015). Child Nicotine Poisoning Prevention Act. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1375

Related Assignments