Complete The Policy Evaluation Worksheet
Complete The Policy Evaluation Worksheetclickthe Assignment Files Ta
Complete The Policy Evaluation Worksheetclickthe Assignment Files Ta
Complete the Policy Evaluation Worksheet. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment. Please note: This assignment is worth 10 points, not 8, which is represented in the video. The first part of the assignment is worth eight points and the other two areas are worth one point a piece. You must have at least 3 references and cited appropriately with both intext and reference page.
All according to APA guideline. Materials · Policy Evaluation Worksheet · Policy Evaluation Worksheet Instructions · Policy Evaluation Worksheet Grading Rubric · Example of Policy Evaluation Worksheet MATERIAL Policy Evaluation Worksheet Choose a policy that was designed to improve the health of the US population. Complete the following questions. Use a minimum of three sources for this assignment and include citations as needed. References and citations should be in APA format.
Responses should be at least 75- to 150-words per question. Part . Give an overview of the policy you selected, including what factors led to its development and when the policy was implemented. 2. Describe the purpose of the policy.
If possible, use language in the policy itself to describe the purpose. 3. What indicators or determinants of health should be addressed by the policy? Part . What data is needed to evaluate whether the policy is meeting its objectives?
List at least two quantitative and two qualitative forms of data that could be used to evaluate your policy. 2. How is data gathered to evaluate this policy? Who collects this data? 3.
Explain two specific evaluation metrics related to your policy. Use the data to explain whether or not you believe the policy is meeting its objectives. 4. If the policy is not effective, what modifications would you propose for the policy? If the policy is effective, how would you strengthen the policy and ensure it continues to meet its objectives?
Use evidence-based research to support your recommendations. 5. What can we learn from the creation and implementation of this policy? References Grading Criteria Policy Evaluation Worksheet This assignment is due in Week Two. Content 75 Percent Points Available 8 Points Earned X/8 Additional Comments: The policy evaluation worksheet details the evolution of the policy chosen from Week 1. · An evaluation of the chosen policy.
All questions on worksheet are answered with 75-100 words per question. · Part 1 · Overview of policy · Purpose of policy · Indicators or determinants of health addressed by the policy · Part 2 · Data is included to evaluate whether the policy is meeting the objectives. List 2 quantitative and 2 qualitative forms. · Defines how data is gathered and who collects the data · Explains two specific evaluation metrics related to the chosen policy. Using the data, you explain whether or not you believe the policy is meeting its objectives · If not effective, describe what modifications you would propose for the policy to be effective. · If effective, describe how you would strengthen the policy so it maintains its objectives · Uses evidence based research to support recommendations · Described what can be learned from the creation and implementation of the chosen policy?
Organization/Development 12.5 Percent Points Available 1 Points Earned X1 Additional Comments: · The responses to the questions are 75-100 words, this does not count the number of words in the question. Only the responses are counted in the word count. · The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. · The conclusion is logical, flows, and reviews the major points. · Cites three to five references. Mechanics 12.5 Percent Points Available 1 Points Earned X/1 Additional Comments: · Citations are formatted according to APA guidelines. · If paraphrased material is used, the citations are included in the answer (the intext citations are not part of the word count) · Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
Total Available Total Earned 10 Policy Evaluation Worksheet Over the years, there have been many policies enacted by the federal government to improve the overall health of the population of the United States. From the implementation of the Social Security Amendment Act to the incorporation of the Affordable Care Act, the welfare of the citizens of this country has been at the forefront of many debates between our legislative bodies. The Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, is one such policy that has its roots in the implementation of Medicare and Medicaid. Part . Give an overview of the policy you selected, including what factors led to its development and when the policy was implemented.
The Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) was created through Medicaid and caters to the wellness of children. Because so many children were in need of health services due to their families not being able to afford private insurance and on the other hand making too much money to qualify for Medicaid, CHIP allowed participants to obtain the necessary medical services to improve health, treat illnesses, and educate families on the importance of prevention and nutrition. Being funded by the state and the federal government, there are requirements that have to be met for individuals and their families to be eligible (Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), n.d.). Enacted into law on April 16, 2015, CHIP became one of the most important pieces 0of legislation to be implemented in many years (Children’s Health Insurance Program Overview, Apr.
17, 2015). 2. Describe the purpose of the policy. If possible, use language in the policy itself to describe the purpose. A component of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 as part of Title XXI of the Social Security Act, CHIP was created to ensure that there would be funds allocated for children’s wellbeing and continued health.
President Obama signed the bill into law along with the approval of Congress, stipulating that $20 billion dollars would be available for this program with eligibility levels remaining constant through September 30, 2019. The main purpose of this enactment was to halt any limitations as to who would be eligible for participation in this program and to expand the coverage that Medicaid had already in existence (Children’s Health Insurance Program Overview, April, 17, 2015). 3. What indicators or determinants of health should be addressed by the policy? Determination of eligibility for Medicaid is very simple if the family's income falls at the Federal Poverty Level (FPL), but when the income for certain families do not meet this criterion, they may become eligible for CHIP.
Presently, 46 states and the District of Columbia adhere by the guidelines set aside for participation in the CHIP program when the families are up to or above 200% of the FPL. This information means that medical services can be obtained for these children since their parents cannot afford to pay for private insurance policies. Although every state has its requirements, the CHIP program is beneficial to those that need health services for wellness visits, annual screenings, and nutritional education (CHIP Eligibility, n.d.). Another indicator that this policy is essential for participants is when working families have children that suffer from illness have a mental disability or have a learning disorder.
Since the requirements to be eligible for Medicaid is so stringent, having the option of obtaining CHIP would alleviate a lot of the medical burdens that they have to endure. Part . What data is needed to evaluate whether the policy is meeting its objective? List at least two quantitative and two qualitative forms of data that could be used to evaluate your policy. When any project or policy is incorporated into an organization, accurate data must be collected to see if it is effective and serving the purpose for which it was designed.
This data can be in the form of quantitative, where numerical values are researched and evaluated, or qualitative in which the results are determined through documentation. One quantitative way to measure the CHIP program is by evaluating the participation rate in each state. Based on the recorded data, the average number of participants in the United States is 88.3% with the highest rate coming from The District of Columbia (97.6%) and the lowest percentage in Nevada (73.7%). All the other states fall at various levels which shows that there was a need for the implementation of this policy (Medicaid/CHIP Child Participation Rates, 2016). Another quantitative method of gathering pertinent data for CHIP is by evaluating the amount of shares allocated to each state to be matched by the federal government.
California has the highest allotment at $2,189.23 while Wyoming gets $14.20 (Medicaid/CHIP Child Participation Rates, 2016). One qualitative way to evaluate the effectiveness of CHIP is by analyzing the data concerning whether the access to care is efficient for the child to obtain adequate medical care. For example, it has been documented that Medicaid/CHIP participants frequent the Emergency Rooms at the local hospitals more than privately insured children. Another qualitative measure is to evaluate the outcomes of health care that the participant received. The frequency of hospitalization of CHIP participants versus those who are uninsured and also the mortality rates can be analyzed (Paradise, Jul.
17, 2014). 2. How is data gathered to evaluate this policy? Who collects this data? There are numerous ways that data can be collected to evaluate the effectiveness of an implemented project or policy.
In the case of the participation rate, the data was collected and determined by comparing the number of children who are eligible for Medicaid/CHIP and are already enrolled in the program to those who are eligible and enrolled plus the children who are eligible and uninsured. The data was collected via survey by the Urban Institute Health Policy Center and is used to determine the frequency of usage of the policy (Medicaid/CHIP Child Participation Rates, 2016). The data measuring the amount of shares per state was collected by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and gives an accurate amount that is spent out of the CHIP budget (Medicaid/CHIP Child Participation Rates, 2016). The Henry J.
Kaiser Family Foundation collected the data that was used to determine the effectiveness of the qualitative data and determined that the access to care and the outcomes had a significant bearing on the low-income participants as opposed to non-participants (Paradise, Jul. 17, 2014). 3. Explain two specific evaluation metrics related to your policy. Use the data to explain whether or not you believe the policy is meeting its objectives.
Two evaluation metrics used to evaluate CHIP is the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and CHIPRA. The Balanced Budget Act implements an evaluation of the CHIP Program on how the access of care and other areas concerning the health of its participants are progressing so that if there are any areas that need improvement, steps can be taken to rectify the situation. The Children's Health Insurance Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) does almost the same thing as The Balanced Budget Act but on a larger scale. Conducted every three years, this evaluation metric assesses the level of care received but also monitors whether there have been any new issues that have arisen that will affect the quality of care that the participants receive (Hoag, et. al., Dec.
21, 2011, pp. 8-9 ). Based on the data obtained over the years since the inception of CHIP, there have been considerable improvements in the health and wellbeing of children who are enrolled in the program. A key element to these favorable results is the educational factor that has gone along with participating in the program. 4.
If the policy is not effective, what modifications would you propose for the policy? If the policy is effective, how would you strengthen the policy and ensure it continues to meet its objectives? Use evidence-based research to support your recommendations. Evidence indicates that this policy is very effective because millions of children have received medical attention that they would otherwise not been able to get. Mortality rates have decreased, as have the number of individuals who required hospitalization due to untreated illnesses.
Also, more families have been educated as to how future maladies can be prevented through regular health screenings, wellness visits, the ability to get follow-up examinations, and the availability of prescriptions. Because of the CHIP program, more children are living healthier lives which impact their everyday lives (Hoag, et. al., Dec. 21, 2011, p. 8). The effectiveness of this policy can be strengthened by more expansion of its guidelines so that even more “between the crack†families can take full advantage of CHIP.
Although a lot of families have benefitted from this policy, there are still others who are not aware that they may be eligible to get the medical attention for their children that they so desperately need. More education to the masses about CHIP would greatly benefit individuals in this category. 5. What can we learn from the creation and implementation of this policy? The most important thing that can be learned from this piece of legislation is that there are avenues that families can research if they are in a situation where their children are in need of health services.
A lot of people feel that if they do not qualify for Medicaid, they have to live in limbo and hope that their child remains healthy and will not be in need of any medical intervention. Even if their children DO remain healthy, parents still need to consider the fact that their children may require other things, such as annual eye exams and dental work, and these situations need to be monitored for them to remain that way. CHIP is out there for them to take advantage of and they should do just that! References Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). (n.d.). Medicaid.gov.
Retrieved from medicaid.gov/chip/chip-program-information.html. Children’s Health Insurance Program overview. (Apr. 17, 2015). NCSL – National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved from surance-program-overview.aspx.
CHIP eligibility. (n.d.). Medicaid.gov. Retrieved from standards/chip-eligibility-standards.html. Hoag, S. et. al. (Dec. 21, 2011).
Children’s Health Insurance Program: An evaluation. (). Retrieved from gram-evaluation-. Medicaid/CHIP child participation rates (2016). The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation – State Health Facts.
Retrieved from child-participation-rates/ Paradise, J. (Jul. 17, 2014). The impact of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP): What does the research tell us? The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation – Medicaid.
Re- trieved from -program-chip-what-does-the-research-tell-us. Article Search and Review Class: Find two articles in the library that covers this week's information. Write a short paragraph of words for each of the articles. The listing of the reference does not count in the word count. Only the description of the article review counts towards the word count.
Run your paper through the plagiarism checker and Grammarly programs. You do not have to turn in the Grammarly report, that is for you to fix your paper where grammar is concerned. Remember Grammarly does not correct APA. You do not have to submit the plagiarism checker report. However, make sure the similarity index is under 10%.There are times I will randomly run some article reviews through the plagiarism checker and if the similarity index is over 10% the article review will not be accepted and you will receive a zero for the assignment.
Please make sure this does not happen to you. Remember the introduction and the conclusion. Use APA guideline.