Conceptual And Theoretical Models: Write A 1500-1700 Word Es

Conceptual And Theoretical Models Write A 1500 1700 Word Essay Addre

Conceptual and Theoretical Models - Write a word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Support your ideas with at least three (3) scholarly citations in your essay. Use strict APA guidelines to format the paper. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount and an abstract and table of contents are not necessary and if included are not part of the overall word count. Choose a theoretical premise in healthcare delivery. Develop a conceptual model with words and graphics. You may choose a premise that has a conceptual model but you MUST revise the model both in words and graphics. Model: Rosemarie Rizo Parse Human Becoming Theory

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Healthcare delivery is a complex and dynamic system that requires robust theoretical frameworks to guide practice, research, and policy development. Among the various models available, the Rosemarie Rizo Parse Human Becoming Theory offers a valuable perspective on understanding patient experiences, emphasizing human interpretation and meaning-making within healthcare contexts. This essay explores the theoretical premise of the Parse Human Becoming Theory, develops a revised conceptual model, and illustrates how such a model can enhance healthcare delivery. The discussion incorporates scholarly insights to provide a comprehensive understanding of the theory's application and evolution in contemporary healthcare settings.

Overview of the Parse Human Becoming Theory

The Parse Human Becoming Theory derives from nursing and human sciences, emphasizing the human capacity for becoming, meaning, and interconnectedness. Unlike traditional biomedical models focusing on disease management, Parse's theory emphasizes the lived experience of individuals, asserting that health is a dynamic process of becoming rather than a static state (Parse, 1998). The core concepts include the human-universe relationship, person-as-harmony, and the process of meaning-making through movement and rhythm. This perspective aligns with holistic healthcare principles, advocating for patient-centered approaches that respect individual perceptions and spiritual dimensions (Fitzpatrick, 2014).

Developing a Conceptual Model Based on Parse’s Theory

To operationalize Parse’s Human Becoming Theory, a conceptual model can be constructed integrating key elements such as human status, health, freely choosing, everydayness, rhythm, and transpersonal caring. The model visually represents the continuous, dynamic process of human becoming within healthcare environments.

Original Conceptual Model (Basic Diagram):

[Insert graphic illustrating: Human-Health-Rhythm-Care Interconnection]

In this model, the human is at the center, surrounded by elements representing health and the rhythm of life, connected through caring relationships. The process is cyclical, reflecting ongoing transformation and meaning-making.

Revised Conceptual Model (Enhanced Diagram):

[Insert graphic illustrating: Human-Environment-Meaning-Health Interplay with feedback loops]

In the revised version, I incorporate additional contextual factors like environment and social support, emphasizing that human becoming is influenced by perceptions, relationships, and cultural factors. Feedback loops symbolize the ongoing, recursive nature of health experiences, highlighting that healing and well-being are continuous processes rather than endpoints.

Applying the Model to Healthcare Delivery

Implementing this revised model into healthcare practice encourages providers to adopt a holistic perspective, actively engaging with patients’ narratives to understand their unique becoming processes. For example, in chronic illness management, recognizing patients as active participants in their health journey fosters empowerment and adherence. The model also emphasizes the importance of environment, spirituality, and social support, advocating for integrated care that respects individual meanings and rhythms.

Furthermore, in practice, nurses and healthcare providers can utilize this model to facilitate therapeutic relationships rooted in respect, empathy, and shared decision-making, thereby promoting better health outcomes and patient satisfaction. The emphasis on rhythm and everydayness suggests incorporating routines and cultural practices into care plans to align with patients’ natural life patterns, making interventions more meaningful and sustainable.

Benefits of the Revised Model

The revised conceptual model enhances understanding of human health as a fluid, contextual, and interpretive process. It encourages healthcare professionals to move beyond biomedical paradigms, fostering compassionate, patient-centered care. Studies have shown that models emphasizing human experience and meaning can improve engagement, reduce anxiety, and improve quality of life (Benner et al., 2010). Additionally, the integration of environmental and social factors aligns with contemporary public health approaches, addressing social determinants impacting health outcomes.

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite its strengths, applying such holistic models involves challenges, including training healthcare providers to interpret complex human experiences and integrating subjective data into clinical decision-making. Future research should focus on developing tools and strategies to operationalize the model effectively across diverse healthcare settings. Tech advances like electronic health records could be adapted to capture narrative data, facilitating holistic assessments aligned with the Parse Human Becoming Theory.

Conclusion

The adaptation and revision of Parse’s Human Becoming Theory into a comprehensive conceptual model significantly contribute to healthcare delivery by centering human experience, meaning, and interconnectedness. Such models promote holistic, patient-centered practices, ultimately improving health outcomes and satisfaction. Ongoing refinement and integration of these models into clinical practice are essential to meet the evolving needs of diverse patient populations and advance the ethos of compassionate care.

References

  1. Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. Jossey-Bass.
  2. Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2014). Nursing theories: An overview. Nursing Science Quarterly, 27(2), 124-130.
  3. Parse, R. R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought. SLACK Incorporated.
  4. Carper, B. A. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 1(1), 13-23.
  5. McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing. Wolters Kluwer.
  6. Alligood, M. R. (2014). Nursing theorists and their work. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  7. Fawcett, J. (2005). The Florence Nightingale legacy: Providence or paradox? Nursing Science Quarterly, 18(2), 107-113.
  8. Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (2018). Integrated theory and knowledge development in nursing. Elsevier.
  9. Meleis, A. I. (2019). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress. Wolters Kluwer.
  10. Markey, K., & Herrmann, M. (2019). Human-centered care and the use of narrative in healthcare. Journal of Patient Experience, 6(4), 229-236.