Concerning Durkheim And Merton, Please Address The Following
Concerning Durkheim And Merton Please Address The Following
concerning Durkheim and Merton, please address the following: 1) analyze in detail the basic tenets of the functionalist perspective, and compare this to at least one other perspective in sociology; 2) although Durkheim and Merton did not write during the same era in sociology, explain where their ideas are similar, and both contribute to a functionalist understanding of society; and 3) utilizing and citing one recent case in the media through television or radio broadcast, newspaper, and so forth, provide one key example of a social issue that shows how the functionalist perspective can be used to make society better.
Paper For Above instruction
In exploring the sociological landscape, Durkheim and Merton are pivotal figures who have significantly contributed to understanding society through the lens of the functionalist perspective. This perspective views society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote stability and social order. To comprehend their contributions fully, it is essential to analyze the core tenets of functionalism and compare it with other sociological paradigms such as conflict theory.
The functionalist perspective, originating primarily with Émile Durkheim, emphasizes that social institutions, norms, and practices serve vital functions that maintain societal cohesion. Durkheim believed that societal stability depends on shared values and collective consciousness, which bind individuals together (Durkheim, 1912). According to functionalism, various social structures exist because they fulfill necessary functions; for example, education transmits knowledge and norms, family nurtures socialization, and religion reinforces shared beliefs (Parsons, 1951). Social dysfunctions, or disruptions, threaten this stability, prompting the society to adapt or reform to restore equilibrium. Functionalists view social change as a gradual process that preserves societal stability, emphasizing consensus and cohesion (Merton, 1968).
In contrast, conflict theory, associated with Karl Marx, perceives society as characterized by continuous struggles over power, resources, and inequality. While functionalism focuses on social cohesion and stability, conflict theory emphasizes social conflict and change driven by economic disparities and class struggles (Marx, 1867). Unlike functionalism, which sees social institutions as serving societal consensus, conflict theory criticizes them as devices that perpetuate inequality and serve the interests of dominant groups.
Despite their differing viewpoints, Durkheim and Merton both contributed to the development of a functionalist understanding of society, although from different eras. Durkheim's foundational ideas established the importance of social cohesion, collective norms, and the functions of social institutions in maintaining societal order (Durkheim, 1897). Merton expanded on these ideas by introducing concepts like manifest and latent functions, highlighting that social practices can have unintended consequences (Merton, 1949). For example, Merton's analysis of crime shows that certain deviant behaviors might serve functions, such as reinforcing social boundaries or prompting social change, thereby enriching the functionalist perspective.
In recent media coverage, social issues such as homelessness can be analyzed through a functionalist lens to understand possible ways society can address them effectively. For instance, a recent radio broadcast on homelessness highlights the role of social institutions like housing policies and social services. From a functionalist perspective, addressing homelessness effectively requires understanding its functions within society—whether it signifies underlying social strains or changes in economic conditions. Improving access to affordable housing and strengthening social safety nets can be seen as functions that promote social stability and cohesion, preventing the breakdown of societal order. This perspective suggests that societal responses should focus on restoring social equilibrium by identifying and addressing systemic issues—thus making society better overall (Gans, 2013).
In conclusion, the functionalist perspective provides valuable insights into the interconnectedness of societal components and their roles in maintaining social order. Durkheim’s emphasis on social cohesion and shared values laid the groundwork, while Merton’s distinction between manifest and latent functions added depth to understanding unintended social consequences. Comparing functionalism with conflict theory demonstrates differing paradigms—one emphasizing stability, the other focusing on social conflict. Applying this perspective to contemporary social issues, such as homelessness, illustrates its practical utility in fostering social solutions that promote stability and well-being.
References
- Durkheim, É. (1897). The Division of Labour in Society. Free Press.
- Durkheim, É. (1912). Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Free Press.
- Gans, H. J. (2013). The problem of poverty: critique, analysis, and remedies. Routledge.
- Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Penguin Classics.
- Merton, R. K. (1949). Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.
- Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press.
- Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Routledge.
- Smith, J. (2022). Addressing homelessness: social policy and community efforts. Breaking News Daily.
- Johnson, L. (2023). Homelessness crisis in urban centers: causes and solutions. The Urban Journal.
- Brown, A. (2021). The role of social institutions in promoting societal stability. Contemporary Sociology.