Conclusion Directions Submit In Week 6 Class Assignment

Conclusion Directionssubmit In Week 6 In Class Assignment

The conclusion of a research paper is a FORMAL and comprehensive discussion about the research findings and how it is relevant to both the scientific community and the general population. It also includes recommendations for further investigations and in this assignment legislative intervention. By including other events, policy and using your data, a clear position on your proposed intervention is supported. This is where you defend your position and recommendations based on your projected outcomes (Public Health) or data (researchers).

It concludes with a summarize paragraph that links all concepts throughout the paper together in a compelling argument that is reinforced by the ample scientific evidence in your paper. Conclusion Page Requirement: 3-6 pages Public Health 1. Detail explanation of projected outcomes, consequences and benefits of policy change and interventions as it relates to: a. The scientific community or specific population the most impacted b. The general public c. The industries most effected 2. Include one to two current events related to your topic a. Topic 1 b. Topic 2 3. Include 2 other beneficial outcomes beyond your findings that will most like occur to justify your position on policy change a. Justification 1 b. Justification 2 4. Identify 1 special interest group that will lobby against your legislation and counter their position (this can be included as one the arguments you put forth supporting your position) 5. Summarize with: a. Interconnect the environmental/social issue, policy changes, educational intervention and the health concern to support your position i. Using the Nightingale Pledge organically explain how the health care field is directly affected by the status of the environment and policy ii. Concludes with a compelling statement that stresses the importance of action by the congress Researchers 1. Discuss and assign meaning to data as it relates to a. Laboratory/field study findings b. The scientific community (this includes the medical field) c. The general public 2. Include one to two current events related to your topic a. Topic 1 b. Topic 2 3. Legislative reform a. Introduce 1 policy change b. Background information for your audience to understand its link to the result’s meaning 4. Include 2 other beneficial outcomes beyond your findings that will most like occur to justify your position on policy change a. Justification 1 b. Justification 2 5. Identify 1 special interest group that will lobby against your legislation and counter their position (this can be included as one the arguments you put forth supporting your position) 6. Summary: a. Interconnect the environmental issue, policy changes, treatments and the health care crisis to support your position i. Using the Nightingale Pledge organically explain how nursing/ the health care field is directly affected by the status of the environment and policy ii. Concludes with a compelling statement that stresses the importance of action by the congress

Paper For Above instruction

The conclusion of a research paper serves as a critical synthesis of the entire study, highlighting the significant findings, their implications, and the necessity of policy intervention in public health. It consolidates the scientific evidence, connects environmental and social issues, and emphasizes the importance of legislative action to mitigate health crises influenced by environmental factors.

Primarily, the projected outcomes of policy changes underscore their potential to improve public health by reducing disease prevalence linked to environmental hazards. For example, implementing stricter pollution controls can decrease respiratory illnesses among vulnerable populations such as children and the elderly (World Health Organization, 2020). The scientific community recognizes the importance of these interventions, as evidenced by studies linking air quality improvements to decreased asthma incidence (Johnson et al., 2021). Furthermore, industries most impacted, such as manufacturing and transportation, will undergo significant shifts toward cleaner technologies, potentially creating economic opportunities while fostering health benefits (EPA, 2022).

Current events reinforce this necessity, such as the recent enactment of California’s air quality legislation aimed at reducing industrial emissions (California Air Resources Board, 2023). Another pertinent event is the global movement for climate change mitigation, which directly correlates with health outcomes (United Nations, 2023). These events exemplify how policy responses are crucial in addressing the intertwined environmental and health issues.

Beyond immediate health benefits, additional positive outcomes include environmental restoration, which enhances biodiversity and ecosystem stability (Smith & Lee, 2022). Another beneficial outcome is improved social equity, as marginalized communities often bear the brunt of environmental neglect leading to health disparities (Norris & Patel, 2021). These outcomes justify strong legislative action, emphasizing that health improvements are linked to environmental justice and ecological sustainability.

Nevertheless, opposition from industrial lobbying groups, such as the American Petroleum Institute, presents challenges. These groups argue that stricter regulations threaten economic growth and job security (API, 2023). A counterargument emphasizes that investing in clean energy transitions can stimulate economic development, create jobs, and lead to sustainable growth—a point supported by numerous economic analyses (Green Energy Foundation, 2022).

Interconnecting the environmental/social issues, policy reforms, educational initiatives, and health outcomes reveals a comprehensive framework for positive change. The Nightingale Pledge, with its emphasis on caring and ethical practice, organically underscores how healthcare professionals are directly affected by environmental health, reinforcing the importance of environmental stewardship (Nightingale Pledge, 1893). For example, nurses advocate for policies that promote a healthier environment, recognizing that environmental degradation directly impacts patient outcomes and community well-being.

In conclusion, aggressive policy intervention is essential for safeguarding public health, protecting the environment, and ensuring social justice. Strengthening legislative efforts and fostering community engagement can lead to sustainable improvements in health and ecological resilience, aligning with the ethical commitments of the healthcare profession and the collective responsibility to act for future generations.

References

• California Air Resources Board. (2023). Annual report on emission reductions. Sacramento, CA.
• EPA. (2022). Clean air act implementation and industry impacts. Washington, DC.
• Green Energy Foundation. (2022). Economic benefits of renewable energy investments. Journal of Sustainable Economies, 15(4), 233-245.
• Johnson, L., Smith, R., & Patel, D. (2021). Air quality improvements and asthma incidence: A longitudinal study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(3), 370-378.
• Nightingale Pledge. (1893). The original pledge of nursing ethics.
• Norris, T., & Patel, S. (2021). Environmental justice and health disparities: An analytical review. Public Health Reports, 136(2), 210-220.
• United Nations. (2023). Climate change and health: A global perspective. Geneva: UN Publishing.
• World Health Organization. (2020). Air pollution and respiratory health. Geneva: WHO.