Conduct A Strategic Analysis Using The Executive Summary Too

Conduct A Strategic Analysis Using The Executive Summary Template Pr

Conduct a strategic analysis using the Executive Summary template. Prepare and submit a three-page executive summary that discusses what strategic alternatives are available and provide a recommended strategy. You are to work alone to analyze and prepare the Executive Summary for the case. Textbook Case Analysis Guidance (CAG) and the Textbook Business Case Analysis Executive Summary Template are required for the case study. The executive summary must include a synopsis of the case, relevant factual information about the problem or decision faced by the organization, an analysis of the business problem in light of course concepts supported by research and literature, and well-supported recommendations. Additionally, it should provide alternative recommendations for future avoidance of similar problems, and conclude with a summary of key points. Your submission must be in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) or rich text (.rtf) format, not exceeding three pages.

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of this executive summary is to analyze a specified business case comprehensively, applying strategic frameworks and course concepts to recommend viable strategic alternatives. The analysis begins with a concise synopsis of the case, providing necessary background information about the organization and its circumstances. This section sets the context for understanding the specific problem or decision faced by the organization, which must be articulated clearly in a single paragraph, focusing on the core issue addressed.

Following this, the core of the paper involves a detailed analysis of the problem using relevant management theories and concepts derived from course materials. This section demands an integration of academic frameworks such as SWOT analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, PESTEL analysis, or other strategic tools, supported by current research retrieved from academic databases. The analysis should also incorporate scholarly sources beyond the textbook to demonstrate depth of understanding and application, drawing comparisons, contrasts, and real-world examples to enhance insights.

The subsequent section presents logical, well-supported recommendations. These should not be specific to the examined organization, especially since the case organization has already addressed the problem; rather, they should focus on how other entities could prevent or mitigate similar issues. Recommendations should be rooted in academic evidence, emphasizing strategic foresight and risk management principles to guide organizations in similar situations.

Furthermore, the executive summary should include an 'Alternative Recommendations' section that discusses proactive strategies to avoid such problems in the future. These may involve policy changes, strategic shifts, or process improvements, grounded in academic and industry literature. This forward-looking analysis should be concise yet insightful, supported by scholarly sources.

Finally, the conclusion should succinctly summarize the critical insights, emphasizing the strategic lessons derived from the case without introducing new information. It should reinforce the importance of the analysis and recommendations, encapsulating the overall learning outcome.

Overall, this executive summary must demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of strategic management principles, supported by academic research and critical analysis. Proper citation and adherence to the structure are essential for a professional and scholarly presentation of the strategic analysis.

References

  • Barney, J. B. (2019). Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Pearson.
  • Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2017). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson.
  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press.
  • Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Wiley.
  • Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson.
  • Christensen, C. M. (2013). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8-21.
  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Cengage Learning.
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
  • Hill, C. W., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Strategic Management: Theory: An Integrated Approach. Cengage Learning.

Related Assignments