Conflict Log

Conflict Log

Conflict Log According to Hocker and Wilmot (2017), “Conflict is an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from others in achieving their goals.” This definition emphasizes key elements of conflict, including expressed struggle, interdependence, incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference. Most conflicts are triggered by specific events, as noted by Hocker and Wilmot (2017), but I prefer to address issues promptly rather than waiting for them to escalate.

Whenever I observe a change in someone's behavior or atmosphere, I become concerned and attempt to resolve the issue immediately. I concur with Hocker and Wilmot (2017) that conflict typically occurs between interdependent parties—those who have a vested interest in each other's actions, whether in a professional or personal context. I value relationships with clear expectations so that conflicts can be more easily identified and resolved. Nonetheless, differing beliefs and values often lead to perceived incompatible goals, which can trigger conflicts.

I believe that recognizing and acknowledging these incompatibilities is essential for effective conflict resolution. Additionally, I consider perceived scarcity of resources—whether tangible or intangible—as a central aspect of conflict. Understanding what each party views as scarce resources and their significance is vital to addressing conflicts constructively. Interference, in my personal experience, occurs when I notice a shift in someone's mood or behavior toward me. This change makes me uncomfortable, especially when I sense that a conflict exists but choose not to address it immediately, which can lead to increased tension.

Paper For Above instruction

Conflict is an intrinsic part of human interaction, and understanding its nature is crucial for effective resolution. According to Hocker and Wilmot (2017), conflict involves an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference. These elements form the foundation of most disagreements and disagreements' escalation. Recognizing the dynamics of conflict can aid individuals in managing and resolving disputes more constructively.

In personal and professional settings, conflicts often arise due to misaligned goals, differing values, or resource limitations. For example, in organizational contexts, scarce resources such as time, money, or personnel can lead to competition and tension among team members. Similarly, in personal relationships, perceived misunderstandings or unmet expectations can trigger conflicts rooted in incompatible goals or values. The immediacy of conflict triggers varies among individuals; some prefer to address issues promptly, while others may delay, risking escalation. The chosen approach influences the outcome of conflict resolution efforts.

One effective method for managing conflict is to recognize and articulate the underlying interests and perceptions of each party. Acknowledging incompatibilities and perceived scarcity of resources allows parties to negotiate and find mutually acceptable solutions. For instance, understanding that a colleague perceives a shortage of resources as a threat can lead to discussions about resource allocation or priorities, thereby reducing tensions. Active listening and empathy are vital skills in this process, as they facilitate better understanding of each other's perspectives.

Interference, or the disruption caused by external or internal factors, is an element that complicates conflict resolution. When individuals sense interference—such as changes in mood or behavior—it can heighten discomfort and hinder productive communication. Addressing these emotional cues early on can prevent conflicts from escalating. For example, if a supervisor notices a team member's withdrawal or frustration, addressing these signs directly and empathetically can reduce misunderstandings and promote problem-solving.

Effective conflict resolution strategies include open communication, perspective-taking, and collaborative problem-solving. Open communication entails expressing concerns honestly without assigning blame, fostering a safe environment for dialogue. Perspective-taking involves understanding the conflict from the other party's point of view, which can build empathy and facilitate compromise. Collaborative problem-solving focuses on finding solutions that satisfy both parties, emphasizing mutual gains rather than win-lose outcomes (Thomas & Kilmann, 1974).

Furthermore, proactive conflict management involves setting clear expectations, establishing trust, and developing conflict resolution skills within teams and relationships. For example, organizations can provide conflict management training to improve interpersonal skills among employees. Personal relationships benefit from establishing shared values and communication norms, which can minimize misunderstandings and promote harmony.

In conclusion, conflict is an inevitable aspect of human interaction that, when managed effectively, can lead to growth and improved relationships. Recognizing the elements of conflict—perceived incompatible goals, scarce resources, interference, and emotional cues—is vital for addressing disputes constructively. Employing strategies such as open communication, empathy, and collaborative problem-solving can transform conflicts from sources of stress into opportunities for development and strengthened relationships. By understanding these dynamics, individuals can navigate conflicts more successfully and foster healthier interactions both personally and professionally.

References

• Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot, W. W. (2017). Interpersonal conflict (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. TKI Associates.
• Deutsch, M. (2014). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. In P. T. Coleman, M. Deutsch, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict (pp. 13-35).
• Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing conflict in organizations. Routledge.
• Peterson, R. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association.
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.
• Bercovitch, J., & Waterman, R. (2001). Evaluating the success of conflict resolution. Journal of Peace Research, 38(1), 41-55.
• Gelfand, M. J., et al. (2012). The cultural foundations of conflict management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 87-106.
• Kolb, D. M., & Putnam, L. L. (1992). The multiple faces of conflict in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 311-324.
• Ury, W. (1991). Getting past no: Negotiating in difficult situations. Bantam Books.