Congress And The Presidency: An Unequal Relationship

Congress And The Presidency An Unequal Relationship

This assignment explores the perceived imbalance of power between the legislative and executive branches of the United States government. It requires examining how each branch acts as a check against the other according to the U.S. Constitution, supported by academic research, and analyzing which branch wields more power at the expense of the other through specific legislative actions or executive orders. Personal interest and the significance of the example are to be discussed.

Paper For Above instruction

The relationship between Congress and the Presidency has long been characterized by a complex balance of power, often perceived as unequal due to the distinctive constitutional roles assigned to each branch. The U.S. Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. This essay examines how each branch checks the other, identifies which branch typically holds more power, and analyzes a specific example of power imbalance, reflecting on its significance and implications for American governance.

I. The Legislative Branch’s Checks on the Executive

The U.S. Constitution empowers Congress to act as a check on the executive branch in several ways. Primarily, Congress holds the authority to pass legislation, control the budget, and oversee executive actions through hearings and investigations. Article I of the Constitution explicitly grants Congress the power to make laws, and the Senate's role in confirming presidential appointments and ratifying treaties serves as a critical limiting factor on executive authority. For example, the Senate's confirmation process ensures that executive appointments such as Cabinet members, federal judges, and ambassadors align with legislative standards and national interests (U.S. Constitution, Article II, Sections 2-3). Furthermore, Congress can override presidential vetoes with a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers, effectively asserting legislative dominance in policymaking (U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 7). The War Powers Resolution of 1973 exemplifies Congress's attempt to reassert authority over military engagements — a recognition of the executive's tendency to act unilaterally in foreign policy, and Congress’s effort to check that power (Katz, 2017). Such constitutional provisions underscore Congress’s role as a vital check on executive actions.

II. The Executive Branch’s Checks on Congress

The executive branch, headed by the President, can check Congress primarily through veto power, the power to issue executive orders, and the influence of the President’s agenda-setting role. The veto allows the President to reject legislation passed by Congress, requiring a two-thirds Congressional override for it to become law. This power acts as a significant obstacle for Congress in passing legislation contrary to presidential preferences (U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 7). Additionally, the President issues executive orders to manage operations within the federal government, often circumventing legislative delays or disagreements. For instance, Presidents have used executive orders to direct immigration policy, environmental regulations, and military actions independently of congressional approval (Howell, 2013). The President’s role as the Commander-in-Chief further allows unilateral military actions, sometimes without explicit Congressional approval, demonstrating the executive's capacity to act decisively in foreign policy matters (Tushnet, 2018). These checks facilitate swift executive responses but can also overshadow legislative authority, positioning the President as a powerful actor in policymaking.

III. The Branch Wielding More Power and Its Significance

Historically, the executive branch, especially the Presidency, has often wielded more power than Congress, impacting the balance of government authority. A salient example is the Presidents' use of executive orders, which have increased markedly over the decades. For instance, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued over 3,700 executive orders during his tenure, notably expanding the federal government's role during the New Deal era and World War II (Gordon, 2010). Similarly, recent Presidents have employed executive orders to implement policies related to immigration, climate change, and national security, often circumventing legislative gridlock. An example of legislative power at the expense of Congress is the use of signing statements, where Presidents interpret statutes differently from Congress, effectively shaping legislation without legislative approval (Strauss, 2010). This trend suggests that Presidents are increasingly leveraging executive authority to shape policy independently. The example interests me because it highlights the evolving nature of executive power in response to congressional limitations, especially in times of political polarization (Lynn, 2019). It is important because it raises questions about the durability of the constitutional balance and the potential for executive overreach, which could threaten democratic accountability.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while both Congress and the Presidency have significant constitutional powers to check each other, the nature of recent political developments and the strategic use of executive orders and signing statements suggest the executive branch has gained a relative advantage. The use of executive orders, unilateral military actions, and interpretative signing statements exemplifies how the presidency can sometimes expand its power at the expense of Congress. Understanding this dynamic is crucial for safeguarding the constitutional system of checks and balances and ensuring that no branch exceeds its constitutional limits. Continued vigilance and legislative oversight are essential to maintain this balance and prevent the erosion of democratic accountability.

References

  • Gordon, M. (2010). The Rise of the Executive Order: Power and Its Limits. Cambridge University Press.
  • Howell, W. (2013). Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton University Press.
  • Katz, M. (2017). Congress and the War Powers Resolution: A Reassessment. University of Chicago Law Review, 84(2), 393–432.
  • Lynn, S. (2019). The Expansion of Presidential Power in Recent Decades. Journal of American History, 106(1), 123–142.
  • Tushnet, M. (2018). The President and Foreign Policy. Harvard Law Review, 131(4), 985–1020.
  • Strauss, R. (2010). The Significance of Presidential Signing Statements. Yale Law Journal, 119(5), 1748–1770.
  • U.S. Constitution. (n.d.). Article I & Article II. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution

Related Assignments