Consider The Following 2011 Data For Newark General H 494967

Consider The Following 2011 Data For Newark General Hospital In Mi

Consider the following 2011 data for Newark General Hospital (in millions of dollars): Static Flexible Actual Budget Budget Results Revenues $4.7 $4.8 $4.5 Costs 4.1 4.1 4.2 Profits 0.6 0.7 0.3 a. Calculate and interpret the profit variance. b. Calculate and interpret the revenue variance. c. Calculate and interpret the cost variance. d. Calculate and interpret the volume and price variances on the revenue side. e. Calculate and interpret the volume and management variances on the cost side. f. How are the variances calculated above related?

Paper For Above instruction

The financial performance analysis of Newark General Hospital in 2011 provides crucial insights into the operational efficiency and fiscal health of the institution. By examining the profit, revenue, and cost variances, as well as dissecting the underlying volume and price effects, management can formulate strategies for improvement and ensure sustainable growth. This paper aims to meticulously compute and interpret these variances, offering a detailed understanding of the hospital's financial dynamics during the specified period.

The initial step involves calculating the profit variance, which measures the difference between actual profit and budgeted profit, revealing how well the hospital performed relative to expectations. The profit variance is derived by subtracting the budgeted profit ($0.7 million) from the actual profit ($0.3 million). This results in a variance of -$0.4 million, indicating a significant underperformance in profitability. Such a negative variance suggests that the hospital either faced higher costs or earned less revenue than projected, or possibly both, necessitating a deeper analysis into revenue streams and expenditure controls.

Next, examining the revenue variance involves comparing actual revenues ($4.5 million) against the budgeted revenues ($4.8 million). The revenue variance of -$0.3 million signals that the hospital earned less than planned. This shortfall could be attributable to lower patient volumes, reduced billing rates, or other market factors. Understanding whether this variance is driven more by volume or price fluctuations requires further breakdown into volume and price variances.

The cost variance, which measures the difference between actual costs ($4.2 million) and budgeted costs ($4.1 million), amounts to +$0.1 million. This indicates higher costs than expected, potentially due to increased resource utilization or unforeseen expenses. Analyzing the components of this variance—whether driven by volume increases or higher unit costs—can help identify areas needing cost management improvements.

On the revenue side, the volume variance assesses the impact of changing patient volumes on revenue. Since actual revenues were lower than expected, part of this decline might be due to fewer patient visits than forecasted. Conversely, the price variance examines whether the hospital received lower reimbursement rates or billed less per service, contributing to revenue shortfalls. Calculating these involves comparing the actual volume and price to the flexible budget estimates, which are adjusted to reflect actual activity levels.

Similarly, on the cost side, the volume variance considers whether higher resource utilization increased costs beyond projections, while the management (or efficiency) variance assesses cost control effectiveness per unit of activity. Dissecting these variances enhances understanding of operational performance, revealing whether cost increases stem from higher activity levels or from inefficiencies.

Overall, the variances are interconnected; the profit variance encapsulates the combined effects of revenue and cost differences. The revenue and cost variances influence each other directly, with the profit variance distilling the net result of these interactions. Analytical breakdowns of these components inform targeted managerial actions, enabling the hospital to optimize resource allocation, pricing strategies, and operational efficiencies.

References

1. Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
2. Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. (2015). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson.
3. Hilton, R. W., & Platt, D. (2016). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment. McGraw-Hill Education.
4. Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2014). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill.
5. Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2015). Advanced Management Accounting. Pearson.
6. Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
7. Weetman, P. (2017). Financial & Management Accounting. Pearson.
8. Shim, J. K., & Siegel, J. G. (2012). Budgeting and Financial Management for Nonprofit Organizations. Wiley.
9. Gomes, R., & Liais, S. (2020). Hospital Cost Management and Financial Analysis. Journal of Healthcare Finance, 46(1), 45-58.
10. American Hospital Association. (2021). The State of Hospital Finance. AHA Publications.