Consider The Following Scenario: Small Equipment Company

Consider The Following Scenarioa Small Equipment Companyis Preparing

Consider the following scenario: A small equipment company is preparing its annual financial statements in anticipation of applying for a loan. During the last week of the year, the company received a shipment of inventory but has not paid for it. The invoice indicates that the company owes $5,000 for the purchase. The owner, Randy Ray, has decided to omit this asset and the related liability from the year-end balance sheet, reasoning that it is okay because he is omitting both of them, which means there is no difference in owners’ equity. For this assignment you are to address the following: What is your opinion of Randy’s reasoning? (1 paragraph) Explain the circumstances under which Randy’s decision would be acceptable under GAAP and circumstances under which it would definitely be unacceptable. (3 to 4 paragraphs). Suggestions for Responding to Peer Posts Provide suggestions to your peer about how he might approach Randy about the subject. If Randy did not cooperate, what responsibility do you have in terms of reporting him? Grading Criteria % of grade for this assignment Response to assignment 80% Peer Response (a minimum of 2) 20% In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings. For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials. Unit Materials

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario involving Randy Ray’s decision to omit a $5,000 inventory asset and its associated liability from the year-end financial statements raises significant ethical and accounting concerns. My initial opinion is that Randy’s reasoning is fundamentally flawed and potentially unlawful. Omitting financial information, especially liabilities and assets that have already been incurred or received, undermines the integrity of financial reporting. Such actions can mislead lenders, investors, and other stakeholders, leading to a false portrayal of the company's financial position. Accurate and transparent financial statements are essential for maintaining trust and complying with legal standards, and deliberately excluding owed liabilities contravenes generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Therefore, Randy’s rationale is inappropriate and risky, as it compromises the accuracy and fairness required in financial reporting.

Under GAAP, the recognition of assets and liabilities depends on whether they meet specific criteria. The primary standard is the accrual basis of accounting, which mandates that expenses and liabilities be recognized when they are incurred, regardless of payment timing. In this context, since the company received inventory worth $5,000, and the obligation to pay for it has been established through the invoice, both the inventory asset and corresponding liability should be recorded in the financial statements. This aligns with the principles of matching and revenue recognition, ensuring that expenses are recorded in the period they relate to and providing a truthful picture of the company’s financial health. Omitting such liabilities and assets would violate GAAP and distort the financial results.

There are limited circumstances where omitting liabilities or assets might be acceptable under GAAP, primarily when the omission is a temporary and unintentional error corrected promptly and does not materially misstate financial statements. For example, if a mistake is identified before financial statements are issued and the correction is made swiftly, it is considered acceptable. Moreover, in cases where the liability is highly uncertain or contingent, and the likelihood of obligation materializing is not probable, an omission might be justified, provided disclosures are made to inform stakeholders. However, in the case of Randy’s scenario, where an actual invoice exists and the amount is definitive, excluding the liability would be inappropriate and constitute a misstatement. Intentional omission, especially to influence perceptions or for personal gain, is unequivocally unacceptable in all circumstances under GAAP. Transparency and accurate reflection of financial health are core principles, and any deviation undermines these standards.

References

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2022). GAAP Codification. FASB.
  • Harrison, W. T. (2020). Financial Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making. Wiley.
  • Spiceland, J. D., Sepe, J. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2021). Financial Accounting, 11th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2019). Financial Accounting, 11th Edition. Wiley.
  • Schroeder, R. G., Clark, M. W., & Cathey, J. M. (2022). Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis. Wiley.
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2022). Regulation S-K: Business and Financial Disclosure Requirements.
  • Scott, W. R. (2020). Financial Accounting Theory. Pearson.
  • Epstein, B. J., & Jermakowicz, E. (2018). IFRS: Policies and Procedures. Wiley.
  • Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2021). Fundamentals of Financial Management. Cengage Learning.
  • Gray, C., & Manson, S. (2018). Principles of Auditing & Other Assurance Services. Cengage Learning.

Related Assignments