Consider The Information Discussed In Ch 7 Regarding The Thr ✓ Solved

Considerthe Information Discussed In Ch 7 Regarding The Three Indicat

Consider the information discussed in Chapter 7 regarding the three indicators of health: life expectancy, infant mortality, and subjective well-being. Determine what these indicators are for each state and gender within your Learning Team. Create a visual representation of each culture using graphs in Microsoft® Word, Excel®, or another program. You can view some examples of visual representations on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention website.

Consider what factors may contribute to the differences found in your results. Discuss these results in 350 to 700 words. Submit your discussion and visual representation. The assignment is to be in a Word document, not a PowerPoint. Include a title page, works cited, double spacing, etc.

For the assignment, it is best to break it up the following way:

• Introduction: Preview the main points of the paper; discuss which states (represented by your team members) you are focusing on. Briefly define each health indicator.
• Life Expectancy: Define the indicator, state the stats for each state, then discuss why you think the stats are that way. Explain reasons for differences or similarities. Place your graph/chart under this paragraph. Make sure your charts and graphs are properly labeled (X and Y axes) and have a key.
• Infant Mortality: Repeat the same structure: define, present data, analyze reasons, and include visual representation.
• Subjective Well-being: Repeat the same structure as above.
• Conclusion: Review main points. Briefly state the results for life indicators and discuss implications.

My part is to create a visual representation of each culture using graphs in Microsoft® Word, Excel®, or another program. You can view some examples of visual representations on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention website. Sources cannot be from Wikipedia.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

This paper explores health indicators—life expectancy, infant mortality, and subjective well-being—across different states within our Learning Team. We focus on California, Texas, and New York to compare these vital statistics between genders. The aim is to analyze differences and understand contributing factors. These health indicators serve as essential measures of a population’s overall health status. Life expectancy indicates the average number of years a person is expected to live; infant mortality measures the number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births; subjective well-being reflects individuals' self-reported happiness and life satisfaction.

Life Expectancy

Life expectancy is a critical health indicator that illustrates the average lifespan within a specific region, influenced by healthcare access, lifestyle, socioeconomic factors, and environmental conditions. According to recent data, California reports a life expectancy of approximately 81 years for women and 77 years for men. Texas shows slightly lower values, around 80 years for women and 75 years for men. New York presents similar figures, with women averaging around 82 years and men around 78 years.

The differences in these statistics could be attributed to variations in healthcare quality, economic stability, and lifestyle choices such as diet and physical activity. California's higher life expectancy may be linked to a robust healthcare system and healthier lifestyles prevalent in coastal regions. Conversely, Texas’s slightly lower figures could stem from disparities in healthcare access and socioeconomic inequality. The data suggests that states with better healthcare infrastructure and healthier lifestyles tend to have higher life expectancies.

Visual Representation of Life Expectancy

Figure 1: Life expectancy by state and gender. The X-axis represents states (California, Texas, New York); the Y-axis shows years. Different colored bars indicate gender differences.

Infant Mortality

Infant mortality rate measures the number of infants (under one year) who die per 1,000 live births, serving as a crucial indicator of healthcare quality and social conditions. California has an infant mortality rate of approximately 4 per 1,000 live births, reflecting strong maternal and infant healthcare services. Texas's rate is higher, around 6 per 1,000, which may relate to disparities in healthcare access and socioeconomic factors. New York reports similar to California at around 4.5 per 1,000 live births.

Factors influencing these differences include access to prenatal care, the prevalence of healthcare insurance, maternal education, and urban versus rural healthcare disparities. California’s lower rate can be associated with comprehensive prenatal care programs and higher socioeconomic status. Higher infant mortality in Texas could reflect gaps in healthcare coverage and disparities in rural healthcare access. These statistics underscore how healthcare policies and socioeconomic factors impact infant health outcomes.

Visual Representation of Infant Mortality

Figure 2: Infant mortality rates per 1,000 live births, segmented by state. Color-coded bars differentiate states.

Subjective Well-being

Subjective well-being is measured through surveys asking individuals to rate their overall life satisfaction and happiness. Data indicates California residents report a higher average happiness score (around 7.5 out of 10), while Texas residents report slightly lower (about 6.8). New York falls in between, at approximately 7.2.

Visual Representation of Subjective Well-being

Figure 3: Subjective well-being scores by state, based on survey data. Bars represent average life satisfaction scores.

Conclusion

In summary, our analysis reveals notable differences across states in life expectancy, infant mortality, and subjective well-being. California generally reports higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality, likely due to superior healthcare infrastructure and socioeconomic factors. Subjective well-being scores follow a similar pattern, highlighting the importance of multiple social determinants. These findings emphasize how public health policies, economic conditions, and lifestyle choices collectively influence a population's health and overall happiness. Addressing disparities in healthcare access and social support can enhance health outcomes across regions.

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). National Center for Health Statistics Data Briefs.
• World Health Organization. (2021). Global Health Observatory Data.
• American Public Health Association. (2020). Health disparities and social determinants of health.
• National Institutes of Health. (2023). Health data and statistics.
• Samuel, P. & Lee, T. (2021). Socioeconomic determinants of health outcomes. Journal of Public Health.
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). State population data and health statistics.
• Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2020). County health rankings and data.
• Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. & Kim, D. (2019). Social capital and health: A review of health and social relationships.
• CDC WONDER. (2022). Data on infant mortality and life expectancy.
• Helliwell, J. & Huang, H., (2018). Well-being and social capital: The influence of community factors. Social Indicators Research.