Constructing An Integrated Balanced Scorecard For Haglund De

Constructing an integrated balanced scorecard for Haglund Department Store

Haglund Department Store, located in the downtown area of a small city, has experienced profitability challenges amidst increasing competition from large national chains on the outskirts. The revitalization of the downtown area presents an opportunity, but the company needs a strategic approach to address key issues. Management is considering implementing a balanced scorecard to improve performance, focusing on the problems of accounts receivable and unsold seasonal merchandise, using specific performance measures. The assignment involves constructing a comprehensive balanced scorecard that links selected measures, analyzing the effectiveness of the strategy, and evaluating performance outcomes.

Paper For Above instruction

The implementation of a balanced scorecard (BSC) for Haglund Department Store provides a structured approach towards addressing critical performance issues and aligning organizational activities with strategic goals. Given the company's challenges related to accounts receivable management and excess unsold inventory, the BSC must incorporate measures that evaluate financial health, internal processes, customer satisfaction, and learning and growth perspectives. This paper develops an integrated BSC using the specified performance measures, illustrating their causal links, analyzing potential outcomes, and providing strategic recommendations.

The first element of the BSC focuses on improving accounts receivable collections and reducing bad debts, which directly impact the store’s cash flow and ability to finance renovations and other strategic initiatives. A key measure is the Percentage of charge account bills containing errors (a). Reducing billing errors should decrease customer disputes, leading to fewer late payments and bad debts. This measure influences customer satisfaction (e), as billing accuracy enhances the customer experience. Additionally, increasing the Percentage of salesclerks trained to correctly enter data on charge account slips (b) will enhance the accuracy of billing data, indirectly reducing errors (a) and resulting in faster collections.

The Average age of accounts receivable (c) is another vital financial measure, reflecting how promptly customers settle their bills. As billing accuracy improves and customer disputes decrease, the average age should decline. This release should simultaneously decrease the Written-off accounts receivable (bad debts) as a percentage of sales (m). Successfully reducing bad debts enhances the company’s cash position, enabling reinvestment into the store. These measures are linked causally: better training (b) reduces billing errors (a), which decreases accounts receivable age (c), and subsequently lowers bad debts (m), positively impacting cash flow.

On the internal process side, enhancing billing accuracy also reduces the total number of customer disputes, thereby improving customer satisfaction. Therefore, the measure Customer satisfaction with the accuracy of charge account bills from monthly survey (e) serves as a customer perspective indicator that directly correlates with internal process improvements. Satisfied customers are more likely to settle bills promptly, further reducing receivables age and bad debts.

Meanwhile, addressing unsold seasonal apparel involves inventory management measures, primarily the Unsold inventory at the end of the season as a percentage of total cost of sales (i). Reducing unsold inventory levels will limit losses from distressed resale to discount stores. This internal process measure can be influenced by multiple factors, including responsiveness to customer preferences and inventory planning. While inventory levels are reduced, the financial outcome, represented by total profit (p), may not immediately improve if other sales or cost factors offset the gains from lower inventory.

On the learning and growth side, several measures promote staff development and organizational capability. Increasing the Percentage of employees who have attended the city’s cultural diversity workshop (o) enhances staff competence and corporate reputation, leading to improved customer service and satisfaction. Also, training salesclerks (b) to correctly enter data is part of staff development; hence, the percentage trained (b) directly impacts billing accuracy. A culture of continuous improvement equipped with proper training is essential for sustaining progress in internal processes and customer satisfaction.

Arrows indicating causal relationships are as follows: Improving salesclerks’ training (b) increases billing accuracy, reducing billing errors (a). Reduced errors lead to fewer customer disputes, boosting customer satisfaction (e). As customer satisfaction improves, customers are more likely to pay on time, decreasing the average receivables age (c) and bad debts (m). Simultaneously, better inventory management through monitoring unsold inventory (i) affects profitability (p). Measures in learning and growth, such as employee training (b and o), underpin internal process improvements, which influence customer satisfaction and eventually financial results.

In summary, the scorecard integrates these measures into a systemic strategy: targeted employee training improves billing accuracy, which boosts customer satisfaction, accelerates bill payments, and minimizes bad debts; concurrently, inventory management reduces losses from excess stock. This comprehensive approach fosters sustainable growth, profitability, and enhanced customer loyalty, aligning internal capabilities with external market demands.

Once the company adopts this balanced scorecard and operates for a year, management should review performance data and analyze which measures improved and which did not. Deviations should prompt root cause analysis and recalibration. For instance, if billing error rates decrease but account receivables do not age faster, perhaps external factors like customer payment behavior or competitive pressures influence collections. If inventory levels improve but profits remain stagnant, cost structure or pricing strategies may need revision. Continuous feedback and adjustment are vital for strategic success.

If customers report higher satisfaction with billing accuracy without corresponding improvements in receivables age or bad debts, it could indicate that while communication and transactional accuracy improved, customers’ willingness or ability to pay promptly has not changed—possibly due to broader economic factors or customer financial health.

Similarly, if internal process measures such as inventory efficiency and receivables improve but total profits do not, it suggests that while operational efficiencies are achieved, external factors like pricing, costs, or market conditions might be constraining profitability. Internal improvements alone are insufficient; strategic pricing and cost management are necessary complements.

References

  • Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.
  • Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Measuring the Strategic Readiness of Intangible Assets. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 52-63.
  • Otley, D. T. (1999). Performance management: a review of research and an agenda for the future. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(4), 251-289.
  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (2008). Public sector only: Reflections on a future research agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(2), 119-129.
  • Melnyk, S. A., Stewart, D. M., & Swink, M. (2004). Metrics and Performance Measurement in Operations Management. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 209-217.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
  • Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2002). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization. Thomson/South-Western.

Related Assignments