Constructing The Multigenerational Genogram Training Module ✓ Solved

Constructing Themulti Generational Genogramtraining Moduleformulti Gen

Constructing the Multi-Generational Genogram Training Module for Multi-Generational Genogram and Cultural Trauma Research Dr. Jeffrey K. Edwards Dr. James Ruby Department of Counselor Education Family Counseling Program Northeastern Illinois University Edited by Lisa Marie Chervenak, M.A. for use in PSY220: Multicultural Psychology at Post University

Read the case study provided and review the constructing the genogram power point for the genogram key symbols. After reading the case study, draw a genogram using Microsoft Word, mapping out all family relationships, including names, ages, and relationship patterns. Include relationship qualities such as conflictual, close, or enmeshed. Write a 2-3 page narrative addressing the following questions:

- Explain the connecting lines you identified in relationships.

- Who had/has the power in the family?

- What patterns or themes are evident?

- How is communication among members?

- What values does the family uphold?

- How do members cope with stress?

- How will this information be important for working with clients? What challenges might you face?

- What additional information would you gather from this family?

- How would you apply Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with this family?

Ensure your paper follows APA format (12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced, one-inch margins). Support your analysis with references from the textbook or credible sources.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The construction of a multi-generational genogram provides valuable insights into family dynamics, patterns, and cultural influences that shape individual behaviors. By systematically mapping familial relationships and analyzing the interactions and emotional bonds, therapists and researchers can identify patterns of transmission related to strengths, resilience, and dysfunction. This paper presents a genogram based on the provided case study of Marshall and Cynthia’s family and discusses key themes, relationship qualities, power dynamics, and implications for clinical practice, especially through the lens of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT).

Firstly, the genogram diagram reveals various relationship qualities among family members. For instance, Marshall’s relationship with his parents appears relatively positive, although noted to have some strain with William, Cynthia's father. The relationship lines between Marshall and his parents are primarily straight, indicating a generally neutral or close relationship, but with some tension stemming from differing values around family and morality. Cynthia's family relationships showcase traditional bonds with close ties to her parents and grandparents, especially with her grandmother Carmen, who resides with her family. These relationships are characterized as close and supportive but also include elements of obligation and cultural expectation, notably with Cynthia’s adherence to traditional gender roles and religious values.

Power dynamics within the family seem to be heavily influenced by cultural and gender roles. Cynthia’s father, William, holds significant authority, especially given his religious background and conservative beliefs. This influence impacts Cynthia’s parenting decisions and her relationship with her husband, Marshall. The genogram indicates that William exerts a form of patriarchal influence, which reflects traditional cultural values. Marshall, as the primary financial provider and a successful professional, holds some degree of authority; however, the familial hierarchy seems tilted toward Cynthia’s paternal family influence.

Patterns emerge around themes of gender roles, religious values, and familial loyalty. Cynthia’s strict upbringing and adherence to traditional Catholic values influence her parenting style, which contrasts with Marshall’s more liberal approach. These differences often result in conflicts regarding parenting decisions, such as Sylvia’s curfew and social activities. The genogram also reveals stressors, including parental disapproval of the family’s potential move to a smaller town, which intensifies disagreements. Interpersonal communication appears strained at times, especially concerning parenting and relocation decisions, highlighting the need for effective conflict resolution strategies rooted in understanding underlying values.

Cultural values such as family loyalty, religious faith, and respect for elders strongly underpin familial interactions. Cynthia’s upbringing in a conservative Hispanic household places a high emphasis on family honor and adherence to religious principles. These values influence Cynthia’s hopes for her children’s moral development and her resistance to her parents’ disapproval regarding the family’s relocation. The genogram indicates that family members cope with stress through various means, including avoidance, expressions of anger, and reliance on faith and cultural rituals. Cynthia, for example, demonstrates protective tendencies rooted in her religious beliefs.

Understanding these family dynamics and patterns is essential for clinical work because it informs culturally sensitive interventions. Recognizing the power structures and relationship qualities enables therapists to tailor communication strategies and set realistic goals aligned with the family’s values. For example, incorporating respect for cultural traditions when introducing CBT techniques can enhance engagement and effectiveness. Challenges in working with such families include navigating cultural tensions and balancing respect for family hierarchy while fostering individual growth. Gathering additional cultural and emotional history would further inform treatment planning.

Applying CBT with this family involves addressing maladaptive thought patterns related to authority, responsibility, and stress communication. For instance, exploring familial beliefs about gender roles and authority can help modify dysfunctional schemas that hinder adaptive coping. Techniques such as cognitive restructuring, family role playing, and developing communication skills can mitigate conflicts surrounding parenting and relocation. Emphasizing problem-solving and behavioral activation within a culturally informed framework will promote healthier family interactions and individual well-being.

References

• McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Shellenberger, S. (1999). Genograms: Assessment and Intervention (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
• Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press.
• Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (2012). Family Therapy: An Overview. Cengage Learning.
• Neukrug, E. (2017). Foundations of Counseling: An Integrative Perspective. Cengage Learning.
• Corey, G. (2017). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. Cengage Learning.
• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. H. (2014). An Introduction to Theories of Personality. Pearson.
• Vandereycken, W., & Van Herwijnen, C. (2008). Cultural influences on family relationships. Journal of Family Studies, 14(2), 107-122.
• Smith, L. (2018). Cultural competence in clinical practice. Psychotherapy Networker, 42(5), 34-39.
• Martinez, C. de A. (2015). Family values and cultural identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 46, 38-50.