Content Overview: Short History Of Passive House And Five Gu

Content Overviewa Short History Of Passive Housefive Guiding Principl

Content overview: A short history of Passive House Five Guiding Principles of Passive House Technologies – Thermal Insulation with no Thermal Bridges - Air tightness - High thermal performance windows - Use of heat / moisture recovery systems - Consideration of Solar Gain Choose 1 of the 5 Passive House principles and outline in 500 words or bullet points, how this practice varies from more traditional ones, what the benefits of this approach are, and what possible consequences need to be planned for, that would otherwise be highly problematic in the building. Sheet1 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES - BAKERSFIELD Property Address Listing Price Square Footage # of Bedrooms Hurrle St., Bakersfield, CA 93308 $ 63, sq. ft. Robinson St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 65, sq. ft. Owens St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 179, sq. ft. Robinson St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 80, sq. ft. Oregon St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 119, sq. ft. Quincy St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 80,000 not disclosed Haley St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 109, sq. ft. Mirador Dr., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 109, sq. ft. Crestview Dr., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 149, sq. ft. Bakers St., Bakersfield,CA 93305 $ 175, sq. ft. North Inyo St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 99, sq. ft. Flower St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 127, sq. ft. Lincoln St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 149, sq. ft. Irene St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 159, sq. ft. Union Ave, 2, Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 119, sq. ft. Loma Linda Dr., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 190, sq. ft. Columbus St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 160, sq. ft. Lomita Verde Dr., Bakersfield , CA 93305 $ 154, sq. ft. Knotts St., Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 149, sq. ft. Benjie Way, Bakersfield, CA 93313 $ 79, sq. ft. th St., Bakersfield, CA 93304 $ 50, sq. ft. th St., Bakersfield, CA 93304 $ 124, sq. ft. E. 3rd St., Bakersfield, CA 93307 $ 75, sq. ft. E. 3rd St., Bakersfield, CA 93307 $ 105, sq. ft. Texas St., Bakersfield, CA 93307 $ 83, sq. ft. E 19th St. Bakersfield CA 93307 $17, sq. ft Kincaid St. Bakersfield CA 93307 $20, sq. ft. Griffiths St. Bakersfield CA, 93309 $27, sq. ft. Vine Dr. Bakersfield, CA 93304 $41, sq. ft. Echo Ave Bakersfield CA 93304 $39, sq.ft. S O St. Bakersfield CA 93304 $43, sq. ft. Washington Avenue, Bakersfield CA 93308 $45, sq. ft. /2 Knotts St, Bakersfield CA 93305 $45, sq. ft. Lincoln Avenue, Bakersfield CA 93308 $63, sq. ft. Sandrini Rd. Bakersfield CA 93307 $425, sq. ft. Soria Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93309 $110, sq. ft. Hewlett St. Bakersfield CA 93309 $110, sq. ft. Rollingbay Dr. Bakersfield, CA 93312 $94, sq. ft. Evanston Ct. Bakersfield, CA 93309 $85, sq. ft. Tucana Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93306 $70, sq. ft. Bloomquist Dr. Bakersfield, CA 93309 $65, sq. ft. th St., Bakersfield, CA 93304 $50, sq. ft. S O St. Bakersfield CA 93304 $ 43, sq.ft. Vine Dr. Bakersfield, CA 93304 $ 41, sq. ft. Griffiths St. Bakersfield CA, 93309 $ 27, sq. ft. E 19th St. Bakersfield CA 93307 $ 17, sq. ft S Fairfax Rd. Bakersfield CA 93305 $ 5,000,,524,600 sq. ft Coram Dr. Bakersfield, CA 93311 $ 2,450, sq. ft. Granite Rd. Bakersfield CA 93308 $ 1,495, sq. ft. Cormier Dr. Bakersfield CA 93311 $ 1,398, sq. ft. Delaney Bakers field, CA 93309 $ 10, Sq Ft River Oaks Bakesfield, CA 93309 $ 13, sq. ft. Hickorywood Ln. Bakersfield CA 93308 $ 16, sq. ft. Washington Ave, Bakersfield CA 93308 $ 20,,292 sq. ft Millbrook Way, Bakersfield CA 93313 $ 22, sq ft. Beechwood Apt 128, Bakersfield CA 93309 $ 24, sq.ft. Robinson St, Bakersfield CA 93305 $ 65, sq. ft. Grace St. Bakersfield, CA 93305 $ 69, sq. ft. Harding Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93308 $ 69, sq. ft. Woodrow Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93308 $ 69, sq.ft. Edwin Dr. Bakersfield, CA 93308 $ 62, sq.ft. Barbara Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93309 $ 199,,094 sq.ft. th Street. Bakersfield, CA 93301 $ 199, sq.ft. Elm St. Bakersfield, CA 93301 $ 199,,164 sq ft. Gratz Way, Bakersfield, CA 93306 $ 199,,834 sq.ft. Rio Grande Ln, Bakersfield, CA 93313 $ 199,,274 sq.ft. Rollingbay Dr. Bakersfield, CA 93312 $ 199,,766 sq.ft Varese, Bakersfield, CA 93308 $ 200,,001 sq. ft. Black Knot Ct. Bakersfield, CA 93311 $ 200,,941 sq.ft Statkowski Ct. Bakersfield CA 93307 $ 198,,512 sq.ft. Indian Wells Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93309 $ 198,,750 sq.ft. Kathy Suzanne Way, Bakersfield, CA 93313 $ 199,,922 sq.ft. North Hills Dr. $ 199,,053 sq.ft. Straub Ln. Bakersfield, CA 93307 $ 199,,507 sq. ft. th Standard Bakersfield, CA 93314 $ 450,, Deacon Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93307 $ 450,, Brimhall Rd. Bakersfield, CA 93314 $ 450,, Hartland Sr. Bakersfield, CA 93312 $ 450,, Kuhio St. Bakersfield, CA 93313 $ 449,, Cliffside St. Bakersfield, CA 93311 $ 449,, Lake Victoria Rd. Bakersfield, CA93312 $ 449,, Bright Water Way Bakersfield, CA 93311 $ 445,, Lake Victoria Rd. Bakersfield, CA 93312 $ 445,, Live Oak Way Bakersfield, CA 93308 $ 442,, Portway Ct. Bakersfield, CA 93312 $ 440,, Wedgemont Pl. Bakersfield, CA 93311 $ 440,, Vista Estrella Bakersfield, CA 93306 $ 439,, Avenida Escuela Bakersfield, CA 93306 $ 435,, South Fairfax Rd. Bakersfield, CA 93307 $ 435,, Jewetta Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93312 $ 434,, Martinsville Ave Bakersfield, CA 93312 $ 434,, Redwood Springs Rd. Bakersfield, CA 93314 $ 434,, Rosedale Hwy Bakersfield, CA 93314 $ 425,, Aretino Way Bakersfield, CA 93306 $ 425,, Longmeadow Way Bakersfield, CA 93312 $ 425,, Garrin Rd. Bakersfield, CA 93311 $ 425,, April Ann Ave Bakersfield, CA 93312 $ 424,, Ferdinand Ct. Bakersfield, CA 93309 $ 420,, Lake Powell Dr. Bakersfield, CA 93312 $ 420,, Edenderry Ave Bakersfield, CA 93314 $ 419,, Sheet2 Sheet3

Paper For Above instruction

The Passive House standard introduces a revolutionary approach to building design that significantly enhances energy efficiency and occupant comfort. Among its five guiding principles—thermal insulation with no thermal bridges, airtightness, high-performance windows, heat and moisture recovery systems, and solar gain consideration—focusing on airtightness reveals a profound shift from traditional building practices. This paper explores how airtightness varies from conventional methods, the benefits derived from creating an airtight environment, and the potential challenges that require careful planning.

Traditional vs. Passive House Airtightness Practices

In conventional building practices, airtightness is often a secondary concern, primarily focusing on weatherproofing to prevent water ingress and air leakage, with many buildings exhibiting considerable gaps and leaks. Traditional construction methods rely heavily on the use of sealants, weatherstripping, and exterior cladding systems that may not consistently prevent air infiltration over time. Conversely, Passive House design mandates a systematic approach to achieve airtightness levels far exceeding standard codes, typically aiming for a maximum of 0.6 air changes per hour at 50 Pascals (ACH50), a benchmark that underscores the importance of continuous air barrier systems.

In Passive House architecture, the focus shifts from merely preventing water intrusion to intentionally minimizing air leaks through meticulous detailing, advanced air barrier materials, and rigorous testing (Feist, 2014). This involves sealing all joints, penetrations, and interfaces between building components, often employing membranes, tapes, and sealants that are durable and flexible. Traditional insulation methods may neglect detailed sealing, resulting in leaky structures that compromise energy performance. Therefore, Passive House approaches entail a profound rethinking of construction sequences, incorporating airtightness as a fundamental step rather than an afterthought.

Benefits of Airtightness

  • Enhanced Energy Efficiency: Airtightness drastically reduces the infiltration of unconditioned air, thereby decreasing the load on heating and cooling systems (Lobato et al., 2017). This leads to lower energy consumption and operational costs.
  • Improved Indoor Air Quality: By controlling air exchange, airtight buildings prevent drafts and limit the influx of pollutants, allergens, and moisture, fostering healthier indoor environments (Kurnitski et al., 2017).
  • Thermal Comfort Stability: Eliminating drafts ensures uniform temperature distribution and prevents cold spots, increasing occupant comfort (Feist, 2014).
  • Moisture Management: Controlled air pressure prevents condensation within building assemblies, reducing mold risk and structural deterioration (Liu et al., 2019).

Potential Challenges and Planning Considerations

While airtightness offers substantial benefits, it also introduces specific challenges that must be addressed during planning and construction:

  • Moisture and Condensation Risks: Excessively airtight structures without adequate ventilation can lead to moisture accumulation, creating conditions conducive to mold and rot (Liu et al., 2019). Proper ventilation systems, such as heat recovery ventilators (HRVs), are essential to mitigate this risk.
  • Construction Quality Control: Achieving high airtightness requires meticulous workmanship and rigorous testing, including blower door tests to identify leaks (Kurnitski et al., 2017). This increases construction oversight and costs.
  • Maintenance of Airtight Barrier: Over time, seals and membranes may degrade, necessitating ongoing maintenance and periodic testing to sustain performance levels (Lobato et al., 2017).
  • Cost Implications: The use of specialized materials and additional labor for sealing can elevate initial construction costs. However, these expenses are often offset by energy savings (Feist, 2014).

Conclusion

The shift from traditional to Passive House standards, especially regarding airtightness, signifies a transformational change in building design philosophy. While traditional buildings may tolerate higher air leakage rates, Passive House emphasizes meticulous sealing to maximize energy efficiency, indoor air quality, and comfort. Addressing the planned challenges through advanced materials, diligent workmanship, and integrated mechanical ventilation systems ensures that the benefits of airtightness are realized without compromising structural integrity or occupant health. As the building sector moves toward sustainability, airtightness remains a critical element in achieving resilient, energy-efficient, and healthy indoor environments (Feist, 2014; Lobato et al., 2017).

References

  • Feist, W. (2014). The Passive House Standard: Principles, Performance, and Cost. Energy and Buildings, 76, 272-284.
  • Kurnitski, J., et al. (2017). Guideline for Airtightness of Buildings—Performance Requirements. Building and Environment, 122, 157-172.
  • Liu, Z., et al. (2019). Moisture Dynamics in Airtight Buildings: Risks and Mitigation Strategies. Journal of Building Physics, 42(4), 234-251.
  • Lobato, A. S., et al. (2017). Energy Performance of Airtight Buildings: Analysis and Real-World Data. Energy and Buildings, 157, 720-730.
  • Feist, W. (2014). The Passive House Standard: Principles, Performance, and Cost. Energy and Buildings, 76, 272-284.
  • U.S. Department of Energy. (2020). Building Airtightness and Its Impact on Energy Consumption. DOE Publications.
  • European Commission. (2018). Best Practices for Airtight Construction. Green Building Council Report.
  • Karagiozis, A., et al. (2019). Impact of Airtightness on Indoor Environment Quality. Indoor Air Journal, 29(3), 344-359.
  • Thuman, C., et al. (2016). Design Strategies to Achieve Airtight Buildings: A Review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(8), 04016021.
  • Victorian Building Authority. (2020). Building Quality and Airtightness Standards. Reports and Guidelines.

Related Assignments