Control Function And Performance Analysis Of Lacks Tracks

Control Function and Performance Analysis of Lacks Tracks Cycles Production Facilities

This paper aims to analyze the role of control systems within a manufacturing business, specifically focusing on Lacks Tracks Cycles’ production of electric motorcycles. The analysis involves understanding the concept of control in a business setting, evaluating the importance of actual production metrics, comparing performance standards with actual outcomes at five different plants, identifying deviations and their implications, and proposing control measures and quality management strategies to enhance operational efficiency. The paper discusses how control facilitates the achievement of organizational goals by monitoring and correcting performance, emphasizing the significance of metrics in managing production processes effectively. Additionally, it explores the potential improvements through Total Quality Management (TQM), underscoring its role in fostering continuous improvement and competitiveness. The comprehensive evaluation presented herein supports the managerial decision-making process aimed at optimizing production and reducing costs to successfully compete with established industry leaders like Harley-Davidson.

Control Defined

In a business context, control refers to the processes and mechanisms that organizations employ to ensure their activities and outputs align with set standards, goals, and objectives. It involves monitoring performance through measurement, comparing actual results against planned targets, and implementing corrective actions when deviations occur (Anthony & Govindarajan, 2007). Control systems serve as fundamental tools for managers to direct organizational resources efficiently, maintain quality, and achieve strategic objectives (Simons, 1995). Effective control fosters a proactive approach to problem-solving by identifying issues early and implementing adjustments to prevent inefficiencies and ensure product quality. In manufacturing, control extends to overseeing production processes, quality standards, safety, and operational costs to enhance productivity and competitiveness (Chandra & Kumar, 2016). Therefore, control in a business setting is indispensable for sustaining high performance levels, minimizing waste, and maximizing value creation in production environments.

Importance of Lacks Tracks Production Metrics

Lacks Tracks Cycles must be heavily concerned with its production metrics because these metrics provide critical insights into operational efficiency, product quality, and cost management. Monitoring actual performance against standards allows management to identify inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and quality issues promptly (Kaplan & Norton, 1996). The competitive goal of Lacks Tracks is to develop a product that can be priced lower than Harley-Davidson’s Electra Glide while maintaining high quality. Achieving this necessitates precise control of production variables to reduce waste, scrap, and downtime—factors directly impacting costs and delivery times (Jorgensen & Pedersen, 2017). Furthermore, production metrics such as cycle time, yield rates, defect ratios, and utilization rates serve as vital indicators for strategic decision-making in capacity planning, process improvements, and resource allocation (Davis, 2020). By focusing on these metrics, the company can ensure consistent product quality, optimize manufacturing processes, and meet customer expectations effectively.

Standard Specifications versus Performance Outcomes at Each Plant

Comparing the standards outlined in the metrics table with the actual performance of each plant reveals variances that highlight operational strengths and weaknesses. In the Maryland plant, the actual yield rate is 99% versus a standard of 98%, indicating superior process control, while the defect rate is lower than the standard 1% compared to 2%. Delaware’s plant, with a yield of 97%, slightly underperforms relative to the standard, but maintains a lower defect and scrap rate, demonstrating relative efficiency. Conversely, the New Jersey facility has a yield of 96.5%, below the standard, with a higher defective rate of 3.5%, signaling quality issues that need addressing. Texas exhibits a notable deviation with a yield of 97.5% but an increased defect rate of 2.5%, which affects overall quality. Alaska’s plant shows good performance, with a yield slightly below the standard and the lowest scrap rate at 1.9%, but faces challenges with safety incidents and utilization rates. These comparisons enable management to pinpoint specific areas for improvement at each site, emphasizing the importance of tailoring control strategies to individual plant conditions (Heizer, Render, & Munson, 2017).

Four Most Significant Deviations and Their Significance

The four most significant deviations among the plants include: first, Texas’s higher defect rate (2.5%) compared to the standard (2%), which indicates potential quality inconsistencies that may lead to increased rework costs; second, New Jersey’s yield rate (96.5%) falling short of the standard (98%), reflecting inefficiencies in production processes; third, the Maryland plant's utilization rate (81.82%), significantly lower than the others, highlighting capacity underutilization; and fourth, Delaware’s safety incidents per employee are at 1.9%, exceeding other plants and underscoring safety concerns. These deviations are vital to management because they directly influence product quality, operational costs, safety, and capacity utilization (Evans & Lindsay, 2014). Addressing these issues can lead to lower costs, enhanced safety, and improved overall production performance, aligning with the company’s strategic goals of efficiency and competitiveness.

Two Types of Controls to Correct Deviations

To correct deviations from standards at its plants, Lacks Tracks management can implement two primary control types: preventive controls and feedback controls. Preventive controls, such as standardized training programs and process controls, aim to prevent deviations before they occur by establishing clear procedures and quality checkpoints (-control charts, process engineering, and regular audits). Feedback controls involve monitoring ongoing performance via real-time data collection and making adjustments based on measurement outcomes—examples include daily production reports and quality review meetings (Davis, 2018). These controls enable management to react swiftly to issues like high defect rates or low utilization, facilitating timely corrective actions that improve process consistency and product quality. Employing both types of controls creates a balanced approach that minimizes variability and promotes continuous improvement across production facilities (Anthony & Govindarajan, 2007).

Total Quality Management

The implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM) at Lacks Tracks could significantly enhance operational efficiency by fostering a culture of continuous improvement and customer focus (Juran & Godfrey, 1999). TQM’s emphasis on quality at every stage of production ensures defects are minimized, waste is reduced, and employee involvement is maximized, leading to higher efficiency and lower costs. By integrating quality into the company’s strategic processes, TQM encourages proactive problem-solving and systematic process analysis, which can drive productivity gains and better product standards (Feigenbaum, 2001). Furthermore, TQM promotes employee engagement and accountability, which are critical for maintaining continuous improvement initiatives. Ultimately, adopting TQM can help Lacks Tracks build a competitive advantage through superior quality products at lower costs, aligning with its strategic goal to challenge industry leaders like Harley-Davidson.

Conclusion

In conclusion, effective control systems are fundamental for managing manufacturing efficiency and achieving organizational objectives in the competitive motorcycle industry. Monitoring production metrics allows Lacks Tracks Cycles to identify deviations that may compromise quality, safety, and cost-efficiency. Comparing actual outcomes to standards reveals specific areas for improvement, such as defect reduction and capacity utilization, which are vital for cost competitiveness. Implementing targeted controls, both preventive and feedback, can systematically address these issues. Furthermore, adopting a Total Quality Management approach will cultivate a culture of continuous improvement, ensuring consistent quality and operational excellence. Overall, leveraging comprehensive control mechanisms and quality strategies positions Lacks Tracks to meet its strategic goals, improve productivity, and successfully compete against industry giants.

References

• Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Chandra, S., & Kumar, S. (2016). Business Control Systems: An Overview. Journal of Business Control, 15(3), 45-59.
• Davis, T. (2018). Performance Measurement and Control. Management Accounting Quarterly, 19(4), 22-27.
• Davis, T. (2020). Manufacturing Metrics and Performance Management. Journal of Operations Management, 62, 45-58.
• Evans, J. R., & Lindsay, W. M. (2014). Managing for Quality and Performance Excellence (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Feigenbaum, A. V. (2001). Total Quality Control. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Jorgensen, B., & Pedersen, E. R. (2017). Cost Management in Manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, 1-9.
• Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1999). Juran's Quality Handbook (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Review Press.