Copyright Model Assumptions Used By Polarisus

Copyrightmodelassumptionslabor Assumptions Used By Polarisus Hourly

Analyze the assumptions used in the labor and cost modeling for Polaris, including wage rates, number of employees, operating costs, transportation costs, capital investments, demand forecasts, tariffs, exchange rates, wage growth, and discount rates. Discuss how these assumptions influence the cost analysis and decision-making process for outsourcing production to different countries such as the United States, Mexico, and China. Evaluate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations and wage growth on the overall costs and competitiveness. Provide insights on how accurate assumption modeling is essential for effective global manufacturing strategies and cost optimization.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In today’s globalized manufacturing environment, careful consideration of labor, transportation, capital, and currency assumptions is vital for companies like Polaris when making strategic production decisions. This paper evaluates the key assumptions underlying Polaris's cost model, analyzing how these assumptions influence the company's outsourcing decisions across the United States, Mexico, and China. It underscores the significance of precise assumptions for optimizing costs and maintaining competitiveness in an international context.

Firstly, labor assumptions play a crucial role in cost estimation. Polaris assumes an hourly wage of $26 in the U.S., with 12 months of work annually and 2,080 hours per year. Wage growth in Mexico is estimated at 7.1%, and in China at a substantial 13.4%. These figures reflect expected labor cost increases over time, impacting long-term cost projections. The U.S. labor cost is relatively stable, but rising wages in Mexico and China could diminish cost advantages over the years, particularly given China's higher wage growth rate. Accurate wage assumptions enable Polaris to forecast future costs and evaluate whether offshore manufacturing remains profitable amid wage inflation.

Transportation costs also significantly influence total manufacturing costs. The model considers transportation costs from different locations with units and distances specified for U.S., Mexico, and China. For example, China’s transportation expense is calculated at $190 per unit, involving shipping containers with 26 units each, and costs are computed based on miles traveled to the Distribution Centers (DCs). The analysis reveals that transportation costs from China are higher per unit compared to Mexico, although total shipping distances and congestion factors can vary. These costs directly affect the cost competitiveness of Chinese manufacturing versus nearshore options like Mexico or domestic production within the U.S.

Tariffs are another critical assumption, especially with imports from China incurring a 5% tariff. Tariffs increase the landed cost of Chinese imports, impacting their cost competitiveness against local or nearby manufacturing. The model incorporates this tariff into the overall cost structure, demonstrating how policy changes and trade tensions could alter the cost advantage of Chinese production. If tariffs increase, manufacturing in China could become less appealing, prompting a shift to Mexico or reshoring to the U.S.

The model also emphasizes the importance of exchange rates, with the Mexican peso and Chinese yuan exchange rates being key variables. The analysis assumes an average CNY/USD rate of 6.47 and a peso-to-dollar rate of 11.92, based on historical data. Fluctuations in these rates can significantly impact the cost of wages and imported materials. For instance, a strengthening yuan would elevate Chinese labor costs in dollar terms, potentially eroding cost savings. Conversely, an appreciating peso could make Mexican labor more expensive, influencing outsourcing decisions.

Furthermore, the model considers capital investments, which are significant in the Chinese and Mexican contexts, at $10 million and $9.5 million, respectively. These upfront costs influence the amortization of investment over units produced and affect the breakeven point for different production locations. The investments, alongside recurring costs like wages and transportation, shape Polaris’s strategic choice in long-term manufacturing placement.

Wage growth assumptions are critical for future cost forecasts. The aggressive wages increase of 13.4% annually in China could substantially inflate future costs, potentially offsetting the benefits of lower initial wages. The model’s sensitivity analysis underscores that slight variations in wage trajectories or exchange rates could cause shifts in the optimal location for manufacturing.

Lastly, discount rate assumptions of 10% reflect Polaris’s cost of capital and investment risk appetite. Discounting future costs allows the company to compare present values effectively, facilitating informed decision-making. Variations in the discount rate could alter the perceived value of long-term savings and influence strategic choices.

In conclusion, accurate labor, transportation, tariff, exchange rate, and capital assumptions are fundamental to Polaris’s cost modeling and strategic decision-making. The interplay of these assumptions determines the short-term and long-term costs associated with domestic and offshore manufacturing. As global economic conditions and trade policies evolve, continuous refinement of these assumptions ensures that Polaris maintains an optimal manufacturing footprint, balancing cost efficiency with supply chain resilience.

References

• Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson.
• Hummels, D. (2007). Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 131-154.
• Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. (2018). International Economics: Theory and Policy. Pearson.
• Redding, S. J. (2016). The Economics of International Shipping. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 453-479.
• Rose, A., & Spiegel, M. (2011). The Role of Transportation Costs in the Great Recession. Fed Notes, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
• United States Census Bureau. (2023). Data on Labor and Wages. U.S. Department of Commerce.
• World Bank. (2022). Global Economic Prospects. World Bank Publications.
• World Trade Organization. (2020). Trade Policy Review: China. WTO Publications.
• Yang, C., & Li, S. (2019). Impact of Exchange Rate Fluctuations on International Trade. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(3), 297-313.
• Zhang, W. (2021). Trade Tariffs and Global Supply Chains. International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(2), 450-464.