Core Skills Of Engagement

Core Skills Of Engagement 1core Skills Of Engagement

Explain why performance reviews are difficult conversations. Describe how you would introduce the performance review, using three (3) of the core skills on pages 59-61: Telling the truth, Self-disclosure, Framing choices, Extending goodwill, Taking and supporting the other side, Naming difficult issues, Acknowledging doubt, anxiety, and guilt, and Making promises and offering guarantees. Explain the three (3) core skills that you used. Provide rationale for each of the three (3) core skills used.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of conducting performance reviews is inherently challenging, primarily because it involves honest and sometimes sensitive feedback that can evoke strong emotional responses from employees. Difficult conversations typically arise due to discrepancies between expected and actual performance, fears of job insecurity, and the potential for conflict or defensiveness. Managers often grapple with striking a balance between providing constructive criticism and maintaining positive employee relationships. The fear of damaging trust or creating dissatisfaction can make delivering honest evaluations a complex task. Therefore, understanding and applying core communication skills are essential to navigate these conversations effectively, fostering engagement and development.

When initiating a performance review, employing specific core skills can significantly influence the tone and outcome of the conversation. Three such skills are Telling the truth, Naming difficult issues, and Making promises and offering guarantees. Each plays a vital role in establishing an honest, transparent, and constructive dialogue.

Firstly, Telling the truth serves as the foundation of an effective performance review. Honesty about an employee’s performance, whether positive or negative, builds credibility and trust. Managers need to communicate factual assessments without distortion or euphemism to ensure the employee fully understands their strengths and areas needing improvement. For example, a manager might say, “Your sales figures have consistently fallen below targets this quarter,” rather than vague or sugar-coated language. This honesty sets a clear platform for meaningful discussion and personal accountability, enabling employees to address their shortcomings or continue their strengths with clarity.

Secondly, Naming difficult issues involves openly addressing problematic behaviors or performance gaps that might be challenging to discuss. This skill requires tact, clarity, and goodwill. For instance, a manager might directly state, “There has been some concern about missed deadlines on recent projects,” rather than avoiding or minimizing the issue. Confronting difficult issues head-on prevents misunderstandings and promotes problem-solving. It encourages employees to acknowledge and confront reality, which is crucial for growth and improvement. Moreover, openly discussing these issues demonstrates the manager’s commitment to transparency and fairness, fostering a culture of openness.

Finally, Making promises and offering guarantees is a strategic skill that helps in motivating employees and reducing anxiety associated with performance discussions. A manager might say, “If you work on improving your report submission timelines, I can guarantee continued support and opportunities for advancement.” Offering such assurances provides employees with a sense of security and motivation to change. It affirms the organization's commitment to their development, helping to bridge the gap between critical feedback and constructive action. These promises must be genuine and backed by tangible support, such as mentoring or additional resources, to sustain credibility and trust in the relationship.

The rationale for utilizing these three core skills—Telling the truth, Naming difficult issues, and Making promises and offering guarantees—lies in their complementarity and collective ability to foster an environment of honesty, accountability, and motivation. Telling the truth establishes the basis for clear communication and trust. Naming difficult issues confronts reality directly, preventing unresolved conflicts from undermining organizational health. Making promises and guarantees offers hope and forward-looking support, encouraging improvement and engagement. Together, these skills turn challenging conversations into opportunities for growth, ultimately enhancing both individual performance and organizational cohesion.

References

• Block, P. (2011). Flawless consulting: A guide to getting your expertise used (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer-Wiley.
• Jha, B., & Kumar, A. (2016). Employee engagement: A strategic tool to enhance performance. DAWN: Journal for Contemporary Research in Management, 3(2), 21-29.
• Kondrasuk, J. N. (2011). So what would an ideal performance appraisal look like?. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 12(1), 57-71.
• Goleman, D. (2013). The focused leader. Harvard Business Review.
• Stone, D., & Heen, S. (2014). Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most. Penguin Books.
• Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin.
• Kim, S. (2014). The art of constructive feedback in performance management. Management Today.
• Hargie, O., & Dickinson, A. (2004). Skills for Effective Communication. Routledge.
• Schmidt, W., & Lock, R. (2013). Effective coaching for engagement and performance. Human Resource Management Journal.
• Van Wart, M. (2003). Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment. Review of Public Personnel Administration.