Cost Of Healthcare For The Mentally Ill

Cost Of Health Carehealth Care For The Mentally Illfrom Titleheal

This week’s first discussion forum will focus on individuals with mental conditions. Our health, or the absence of such, can be very expensive. Many vulnerable populations simply do not have private funds available to pay for their care. Relating your research to individuals with mental conditions, select a mental illness of your choice and answer the following questions: What public financing resources are available to individuals with this particular mental condition? What are the eligibility requirements and restrictions to receive these funds? What happens if eligibility standards/requirements are not met by those with this illness? Are there any alternative care options specific to this group that might be available?

This week’s second discussion forum will focus on the suicide- and homicide-prone population. Based on the article “The War on Suicide?” and the video “One a Day: Soldier and Suicide in the U.S. Military,” the struggles and barriers of military service members are highlighted. Although many resources are available to the military, and most are provided at no cost, the suicide rate is enormous. Please answer the subsequent questions: Which barriers do our soldiers face on a daily basis? Why are some hesitant to consult available and free resources? What are your suggestions on how these barriers can be reduced or eliminated?

Paper For Above instruction

The cost of healthcare, particularly for individuals with mental health conditions, remains a significant challenge within the healthcare system. Mental health disorders not only impact individuals' well-being but also impose financial burdens due to treatment expenses and associated support services. Public financing resources play a critical role in ensuring access to necessary care, especially for vulnerable populations lacking private insurance or financial means.

Focusing on schizophrenia, a severe mental disorder characterized by distortions in thinking, perception, and behavior, reveals a complex landscape of public resources. In the United States, Medicaid serves as a primary public funding source for individuals with schizophrenia, especially for those with low income. Medicaid eligibility is generally means-tested, requiring individuals to fall below certain income and asset thresholds. In addition to income requirements, many states impose residency and age restrictions, although some programs are designed to cover all eligible low-income residents regardless of age. If individuals with schizophrenia do not meet the eligibility criteria, they may be ineligible for Medicaid coverage, forcing reliance on other less comprehensive or costly options, such as community-based services or sliding scale clinics.

When eligibility is not met, individuals may turn to alternative care options such as psychiatric emergency services, state-funded community mental health programs, or charitable organizations that provide free or low-cost treatment. However, these alternatives may face limitations related to service availability, geographical accessibility, and duration of care, often leading to gaps in continuous treatment and management.

Hearing about the barriers faced by mentally ill individuals underscores the systemic challenges they encounter in accessing proper care. Issues such as stigma, limited awareness of available resources, bureaucratic hurdles, and logistical difficulties hinder many from seeking or receiving adequate treatment. Stigma particularly discourages individuals from openly seeking help, fearing discrimination or social exclusion. Additionally, complicated eligibility requirements and paperwork often deter eligible individuals from applying for public assistance. When individuals fail to meet strict eligibility criteria, they may experience untreated symptoms, worsening their condition and increasing the risk of crisis scenarios such as hospitalization or homelessness.

Turning our attention to military service members, the barriers to mental health care are multifaceted. Although the military offers a range of free mental health services, soldiers often face obstacles such as stigma associated with seeking psychological help, fear of impacting their careers, and concerns about confidentiality. These barriers are compounded by the hyper-masculine culture prevalent within military settings, which discourages vulnerability and openly discussing mental health issues. Furthermore, logistical issues, such as the geographic placement of military bases and deployment schedules, complicate consistent access to care.

Many soldiers are hesitant to utilize available mental health resources because of perceived stigma and fears related to career impacts. They worry that seeking help might be seen as a weakness or might negatively influence their prospects for promotion or deployment. To address these barriers, military institutions need to foster a culture of openness and normalize mental health care, emphasizing that seeking help is a sign of strength, not weakness. Implementing confidential, easily accessible counseling options, increasing mental health literacy, and involving leadership in destigmatizing mental health discussions could substantially reduce hesitation among service members.

In conclusion, improving access to mental health care for both civilians and military personnel requires systemic change. Public resources like Medicaid are vital but often limited by strict eligibility requirements. Expanding coverage, reducing bureaucratic hurdles, and increasing awareness can help bridge gaps for vulnerable populations. For military members, overcoming cultural barriers through leadership support, confidentiality assurances, and destigmatization initiatives is essential. Ultimately, a multifaceted approach that integrates policy reform, education, and cultural change is necessary to ensure that mental health services are accessible, acceptable, and effective for all who need them.

References

  • Alonso, J., et al. (2018). The global burden of mental disorders: An update from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Epidemiology and Psychiatrische Sciences, 27(1), 1-12.
  • Beronio, K., et al. (2014). Affordable care act expands mental health and substance use disorder benefits and federal parity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(4), 359-361.
  • Farmer, P., & Cunningham, R. (2019). Access to mental health services in the United States: Issues and solutions. Health Affairs, 38(4), 560-566.
  • Hoge, C. W., et al. (2004). Mental health problems and barriers to care among military personnel. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(4), 265-273.
  • Knapp, M., et al. (2011). The economic case for investing in mental health. WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP).
  • Luxton, D. D., et al. (2013). Combatting the stigma of mental health treatment in the military: A review of current strategies. Military Medicine, 178(7), 695-701.
  • Mojtabai, R., et al. (2016). Barriers to mental health treatment: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychiatric Services, 67(1), 30-36.
  • Patel, V., et al. (2018). The future of mental health care: Integrating mental health into primary health care. BMJ, 362, k2440.
  • Rosenheck, R., et al. (2016). Mental health services and barriers to access among veterans. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 39(2), 126-134.
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs. (2020). Mental health resources for veterans. VA.gov.

Related Assignments