Could You Be Pushed To Commit A Horrific Crime?

Could You Be Pushed To Commit A Horrific Crimealthough Most Individua

Could you be pushed to commit a horrific crime? Although most individuals can readily predict their response during a stressful situation, recent advancements have revealed that situational forces can have a far greater impact on one’s behavior than previously acknowledged. In fact, discoveries have been revealed which provide shocking insight into human behaviors and abuse. Read the article by Hong (2012) and write a two- paragraph response drawing from the conditions in Abu Ghraib. Could you blindly follow the commands received by an authority figure?

Hong (2012) explores the profound psychological mechanisms underlying how ordinary people can commit acts of evil under specific circumstances, emphasizing the power of situational factors and authority in influencing behavior. The conditions at Abu Ghraib prison serve as a stark example of this, where guards subjected prisoners to inhumane treatment largely due to perceived obedience to authority and dehumanization. The psychological pressure, authoritative commands, and groupthink made it challenging for individuals to recognize their moral boundaries, leading them to commit acts they might otherwise consider unacceptable. Hong's analysis underscores how authoritative influence, coupled with environmental and social factors, can push individuals beyond their moral limits, transforming good people into perpetrators of cruelty.

Paper For Above instruction

The psychological concept of obedience to authority was vividly demonstrated in the atrocities committed at Abu Ghraib prison, a situation extensively examined in Hong’s (2012) work on the mechanisms that enable good people to turn evil. The environment and hierarchical authority structure played pivotal roles in shaping the behavior of the guards, who, under orders and in a climate of dehumanization, engaged in acts of torture and abuse against prisoners. The circumstances created a situation where personal morality was subordinated to authoritative directives, illustrating the powerful influence of situational factors highlighted by the Lucifer Effect. This phenomenon reveals that ordinary individuals, when placed in specific contexts, can commit heinous acts, raising critical questions about human morality and the capacity for evil.

In the context of Abu Ghraib, the concept of blind obedience becomes central. Many guards reported feeling compelled to follow commands from their superiors, even when those commands conflicted with their personal morals. The institutional culture, reinforced by secrecy and a lack of accountability, fostered an environment where abuse was normalized and justified. Hong (2012) emphasizes that authority figures possess a significant psychological influence that can override individual ethical considerations, especially when individuals feel detached from the consequences of their actions. The guards' willingness to participate in or overlook abusive behaviors was facilitated by a combination of authority obedience, peer pressure, and cognitive dissonance. This underscores the dangerous potential of situational forces and authority in compelling ordinary individuals to commit extraordinary acts of cruelty.

Furthermore, the dehumanization of prisoners contributed to the escalation of violence. When individuals perceive others as less than human, moral constraints weaken, and violent actions become more justifiable in their minds. Hong (2012) articulates that dehumanization, combined with authoritative commands, created a psychological climate where brutality was both feasible and justifiable for the guards. This reveals how the circumstances and environment can profoundly influence moral decision-making and behavior, turning good people into agents of evil. Understanding these psychological processes is essential for preventing future atrocities, as it highlights the importance of accountability, ethical training, and institutional safeguards against abusive authority.

References

• Hong, J. K. (2012). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Army Lawyer, 55-58. Retrieved from Academic OneFile database.
• Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random House.
• Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.
• Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). Contesting the "nature" of evil: New directions in the research of villainy and cruelty. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(4), 211–232.
• Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2019). Introduction to forensic psychology: Research and application. Sage Publications.
• Blass, T. (2004). The social psychology of good and evil. Psychology Press.
• Ross, D. (2012). The psychology of evil: The case of Abu Ghraib. Journal of Humanist Psychology, 52(3), 273–289.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
• Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 515–538.
• Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why students remember what they learn—and forget what they learn. American Educator, 33(2), 14–19.