Counseling And Therapies Feedback Rubric: Discuss EFT

Counseling And Therapies Feedback Rubric2015105discuss Eft And Your Cr

Discuss EFT and your criticisms with this approach. Writing shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points well developed thoughts. The writing clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in-depth analysis of original thought and support for the topic. Writing is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. The writing sufficiently expresses coherent ideas from original thinking supported by firm evidence.

Main points well developed with quality supporting details and reflects. Writing is coherent and logically organized, but some points are misplaced or stray from the topic. Some transitions are used inconsistently. Main ideas reflecting some critical thinking is presented without detail or development. Writing lacks logical organization.

It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity. Many or serious errors are present. Main ideas reflect little critical thinking and are presented without detail, development, or ideas are vaguely presented. Relevance of EFT to personal relationships. Writing shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points well developed thoughts. The writing clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in-depth analysis of original thought and support for the topic. The writing sufficiently expresses coherent ideas from original thinking supported by firm evidence. Main points well developed with quality supporting details and reflects. Writing is coherent and logically organized, but some points are misplaced or stray from the topic. Some transitions are used inconsistently. Main ideas reflecting some critical thinking are presented without detail or development. Writing lacks logical organization. It shows some coherence but ideas lack unity. Many or serious errors are present. Main ideas reflect little critical thinking and are presented without detail, development, or ideas are vaguely presented. The relevance of EFT to a personal relationship. Writing shows high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points well developed thoughts. The writing clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in-depth analysis of original thought and support for the topic. The writing is coherent, well-organized, with transitions. Main points are well supported with details. Critical thinking is evident. Errors are minimal. Formatting and organization meet academic standards.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) has garnered considerable attention as a psychological intervention that combines elements of cognitive therapy and exposure therapy with acupressure. It is based on the premise that emotional distress is caused by disruptions in the body's energy systems, and tapping on specific meridian points can restore balance and alleviate psychological symptoms (Church et al., 2013). Despite its growing popularity, EFT faces significant criticisms related to its scientific basis, methodological rigor, and clinical efficacy.

One of the primary criticisms of EFT concerns its lack of a robust scientific foundation. Critics argue that the mechanism by which tapping purportedly influences energy meridians lacks empirical support. Neuroscientific evidence does not conclusively demonstrate the existence of energy meridians or that tapping on these points produces physiological changes associated with symptom relief (Sherwood, 2018). This raises questions about the theoretical basis of EFT and whether its effects are attributable to placebo or expectancy effects rather than specific mechanisms.

Furthermore, methodological issues in EFT research contribute to skepticism. Many studies examining EFT's efficacy suffer from small sample sizes, lack of control groups, and inadequate blinding. For instance, a meta-analysis by Price and colleagues (2018) concluded that while EFT shows promise, the current evidence base is limited by low-quality studies that are susceptible to bias. Without rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is difficult to determine whether EFT produces effects beyond placebo, and whether these effects are clinically meaningful.

Another critique centers on the subjective nature of outcomes reported in EFT studies. Many reports rely on self-reported measures of psychological distress, which are vulnerable to placebo effects and reporting biases. Objective measures such as physiological markers or neuroimaging data are scarce but are essential to substantiate claims of EFT’s mechanisms of action (Stapleton & Green, 2014). The lack of such evidence diminishes confidence in EFT's purported benefits and underscores the importance of scientific validation.

Despite these criticisms, supporters argue that EFT is a low-risk and accessible intervention that can complement existing therapies. Anecdotal evidence and preliminary studies suggest that EFT may offer relief for conditions like phobias, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the clinical community emphasizes the need for more robust research to confirm these benefits and elucidate underlying processes. Critics advocate for scientific rigor, including larger sample sizes, control conditions, and neurobiological investigations, to establish EFT’s place in evidence-based practice.

In conclusion, while EFT presents an innovative approach to psychological treatment with promising preliminary evidence, it remains controversial due to its limited scientific validation. Ethical practice requires clinicians and researchers to critically evaluate EFT’s theoretical claims and empirical support. Ongoing research employing rigorous methodology is essential to determine whether EFT’s benefits are genuine or predominantly placebo effects. Ultimately, skepticism rooted in scientific inquiry must guide the integration of EFT into mainstream psychological interventions.

References

• Church, D., de Asis, M., & Brooks, A. J. (2013). The EFT manual. Atlanta, GA: Energy Psychology Press.
• Price, L., et al. (2018). A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of emotional freedom technique. Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine, 23(2), 1-10.
• Sherwood, A. (2018). Debunking the energy meridian theory in EFT. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 24(5), 400-403.
• Stapleton, P., & Green, P. (2014). A neurobiological perspective on EFT mechanisms. Neuroscience & Behavioral Reviews, 46, 1-9.