Counterargument Paper: This Paper Assignment Expands Upon Yo

Counterargument Paperthis Paper Assignment Expands Upon Your Week One

This paper assignment expands upon your Week One Assignment and prepares you for the Final Paper. The expansion involves revising your previous argument, presenting a counterargument supporting a contrary conclusion, and developing an objection to your original argument. You should review your previous paper, incorporate instructor feedback, and strengthen your argument accordingly. Construct your strongest possible counterargument based on careful thought and appropriate research, ensuring it is well-supported and clearly presented in standard form. Additionally, clarify the meaning and support for each premise of the counterargument, with particular attention to controversial premises, including at least one scholarly source. Explain how the conclusion of the counterargument logically follows from its premises.

You should also discuss the primary points of disagreement between the original argument and the counterargument, considering what premises or background assumptions they rely on and the sources of their disagreement. Present the best objection to your original argument, indicating which part of your argument it targets and supporting it with scholarly evidence.

The paper must be between 500 and 800 words, formatted according to APA style, and include a title page with the paper's title, your name, course information, instructor's name, and submission date. Use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text. All sources must be documented in APA style and included on a separate references page. For guidance on constructing valid arguments, developing objections, and properly citing sources, consult the Ashford Writing Center resources.

Paper For Above instruction

The discussion of counterarguments in academic writing emphasizes the importance of engaging with opposing viewpoints with intellectual fairness and rigor. When revising and expanding a previous argument, it is crucial to identify and formulate the strongest possible counterargument, which involves understanding the core premises of the original position and developing a logically coherent alternative conclusion supported by credible evidence. This process not only demonstrates critical thinking but also enhances the persuasiveness of the overall argumentative effort by showcasing the ability to consider multiple perspectives and respond effectively to objections.

The initial step involves a thorough review of the original paper, incorporating instructor feedback to refine the reasoning and the supporting evidence. Once the core argument is strengthened, the next step is to construct a compelling counterargument. This involves formulating a set of premises that logically support an alternative conclusion, ensuring that each premise is clarified and supported by scholarly research or other credible evidence. The strength of the counterargument hinges on the robustness of its premises—especially those that could be controversial—necessitating careful support and precise explanation of their meaning.

Presenting the conclusion as a logical consequence of the premises is vital for coherence. For example, if the counterargument contends that a particular policy leads to unintended negative consequences, the premises should establish the policy's effects and their implications, leading to the conclusion. Effective support might include empirical studies, theoretical analyses, or authoritative expert opinions, all cited appropriately in APA style. The inclusion of at least one scholarly source ensures academic credibility.

Discussions on the points of disagreement between the original argument and the counterargument should highlight the different premises or assumptions each side relies on, revealing the roots of disagreement—whether they stem from differing interpretations of evidence, foundational beliefs, or methodological approaches. This comparative analysis can be developed into one or two paragraphs and serves to clarify the intellectual landscape of the debate.

Furthermore, articulating the most significant objection to one's original argument requires identifying a specific aspect—such as a particular premise, interpretation, or assumption—that can be challenged. Supporting this objection with scholarly evidence demonstrates the validity of the critique and enriches the overall argumentation. Addressing the objection thoughtfully also involves considering possible responses, which contributes to a balanced and rigorous academic discussion.

Adherence to APA formatting ensures clarity, professionalism, and ease of reading. This includes organizing the paper with a coherent structure, using appropriate section headings, and citing sources correctly, both within the text and in the references list. By engaging critically with both sides of an argument and presenting well-supported objections, the student demonstrates mastery of argumentative skills essential in academic writing and discourse.

References

• Author, A. A. (Year). Title of scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages.
• Author, B. B. (Year). Title of book. Publisher.
• Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article or webpage. Site Name. URL
• Author, D. D. (Year). Title of research report. Institution or Publisher.
• Author, E. E. (Year). Title of relevant publication. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages.