Country Comparison Use Portrait Formatting In The First Part

Country Comparisonuse Portrait Formatting In The First Part Of Your As

Use portrait formatting in the first part of your assignment for the text and then reference your table in landscape format in the second part of the report. To do this insert a carriage return/paragraph (control–enter) at the end of the first section. Move your cursor to the next section. Click on the layout menu tab and click on page setup. On preview menu click on the apply to menu and select: “this part forward” and then press OK.

Many differences exist from country to country. The differences are due to economic, social, and political factors. This assignment allows you to contrast a variety of countries based on some indices (five) that I have chosen for you, as well as from indices you get to choose. The indices I have chosen come from The CIA FactBook and from Transparency International (look online). Your indices may come from the CIA FactBook and other international groups such as the United Nations and NGOs (e.g., Doctors Without Borders).

Extra points are awarded for going beyond the CIA Factbook and Transparency International. Take a look around to see if you have a favorite index you’d like to share in class. I have also picked six countries for you, and you are responsible for choosing another six. Make sure that the countries you choose are not all from the same continent or region. The data should be organized in a table and use appropriate units ($, tons, %, etc.).

In addition, I expect a two-page, double-spaced report on your findings. I will be looking for your comparisons and contrasts, as well as what you found that was unexpected. Your report should include the following countries: USA, Mexico, Romania, Australia, China, India, Germany, Ghana, Canada, plus the six additional countries you select, with a rationale for your choices.

Include at least five indices and explain why you selected each. These may include Infant Mortality Rate per 1000, Life Expectancy in years, GDP per Capita, Literacy Rate, Transparency International Corruption Scale, Percentage of GDP spent on healthcare, and World Economic Forum Country Development Ranking. Additionally, group two or three indices to illustrate an industry or social trend of interest. Remember to incorporate data from sources other than CIA for extra points.

Paper For Above instruction

Global comparisons of countries provide insight into the wide-ranging economic, social, and political landscapes that shape national development. A thorough analysis involves selecting relevant indices that portray a country's health, economic capacity, social stability, and governance. For this project, I chose to compare ten countries—USA, Mexico, Romania, Australia, China, India, Germany, Ghana, Canada, and Brazil—and supplemented these with six additional countries I selected based on diverse geographic and economic profiles, including South Africa, Japan, Nigeria, Argentina, France, and Egypt.

The indices chosen for this comparison include Infant Mortality Rate per 1000 live births, Life Expectancy in years, GDP per Capita, Literacy Rate, Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index, Percentage of GDP spent on healthcare, and World Economic Forum’s Country Development Index. These indices offer a multifaceted view of each country's development status. For instance, Infant Mortality Rate and Life Expectancy reflect health systems' effectiveness, while GDP per Capita indicates economic prosperity. Literacy Rate serves as a measure of education, and the Corruption Perceptions Index evaluates governance quality. Healthcare expenditure gives insight into priorities and resources allocated to health, and the Country Development Index encapsulates overall progress.

Analyzing these indices reveals significant disparities. The USA demonstrates high GDP per Capita, high life expectancy, and relatively low infant mortality, highlighting advanced healthcare and economic stability. Conversely, Nigeria exhibits higher infant mortality rates, lower life expectancy, and lower GDP per Capita, reflecting developmental challenges. Countries like Japan and France display high literacy rates and low corruption levels, underscoring strong governance and educational systems, whereas countries such as South Africa and Egypt show moderate scores with room for improvement across these indices.

Grouping indices reveals trends; for example, high healthcare spending correlates with higher life expectancy in many developed countries, indicating the importance of resource investment. Similarly, a high corruption perception score tends to correlate with lower GDP per Capita, illustrating governance’s impact on economic development. Importantly, some nations, like India and Nigeria, demonstrate that despite lower economic scores, improvements in health and education are ongoing, emphasizing the importance of targeted development policies.

In summary, the comparison underscores the varying stages of development and highlights how economic, social, and political factors interplay across different nations. Recognizing these disparities helps inform international development efforts and encourages policy adjustments tailored to each country’s unique context. The combination of multiple indices provides a comprehensive view, and exploring additional indices, such as environmental sustainability or technological innovation, could further enrich this analysis.

References

  • Central Intelligence Agency. (2023). The World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/
  • Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi
  • World Economic Forum. (2023). Global Competitiveness Report. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2023
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Human Development Index. https://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
  • World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator
  • OECD. (2022). Education at a Glance. https://www.oecd.org/education/
  • WHO. (2022). Global Health Observatory. https://www.who.int/data/gho
  • Doctors Without Borders. (2023). State of Medical Justice Reports. https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/
  • International Monetary Fund. (2023). World Economic Outlook. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO
  • United Nations. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals Report. https://sdgs.un.org/publications/2022-sdg-report

Related Assignments