Course On Managing International Business Responsibly Assess

Course Managing International Business Responsibly assessment Task 2

Explore the CSR work of one international company in depth and evaluate it with reference to core ideas, concepts, and theories from this course. Your essay should include a title page, an introduction, an overview of the chosen company, a detailed analysis and evaluation of its CSR activities, recommendations for improvement, a conclusion, and a reference list. Use company reports and external sources for evidence, and critically assess the company's CSR using frameworks such as Carroll’s Pyramid, stakeholder theory, and GRI criteria. Provide well-justified recommendations based on your evaluation, ensuring adherence to academic standards and proper citation of at least eight scholarly references.

Paper For Above instruction

The increasing prominence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in international business underscores the importance for companies to integrate social and environmental considerations into their operational strategies. This paper critically examines the CSR efforts of Nestlé, one of the world's largest multinational food and beverage corporations, analyzing the effectiveness, authenticity, and opportunities for enhancement of its CSR initiatives.

Introduction

Corporate Social Responsibility has become a fundamental component of modern business strategy, especially for multinational enterprises operating across diverse socio-economic environments. This paper aims to explore Nestlé’s CSR activities, evaluate their alignment with core CSR theories, and provide actionable recommendations for improving its social and environmental impact. Through a comprehensive analysis grounded in academic frameworks, the paper seeks to assess whether Nestlé’s CSR efforts genuinely address stakeholder concerns and contribute to sustainable development.

Overview of Nestlé

Founded in 1866 and headquartered in Vevey, Switzerland, Nestlé is the world's leading nutrition, health, and wellness company, with operations spanning over 190 countries. It offers a broad portfolio of products, including beverages, infant foods, confectionery, and pet foods. As a global entity, Nestlé faces complex challenges related to ethical sourcing, environmental sustainability, and social justice. Its CSR activities are primarily documented through its Sustainability and Creating Shared Value reports, which outline initiatives related to responsible sourcing, environmental footprint reduction, and community engagement.

Analysis and Evaluation of Nestlé’s CSR Work

Description of CSR Activities

Nestlé’s CSR initiatives focus on several key areas, including responsible sourcing, water stewardship, climate change mitigation, and community development. Notably, its "Creating Shared Value" (CSV) strategy emphasizes sustainable agriculture, responsible packaging, and the promotion of nutrition and health. For example, Nestlé commits to sourcing 100% of its key ingredients responsibly and aims for a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 (Nestlé, 2022). The company also invests in programs like the Nestlé Cocoa Plan, which addresses child labor and poverty in cocoa-producing regions, and its water stewardship program aims to improve water efficiency and access in vulnerable communities (Nestlé, 2021).

The Rationale Behind CSR Initiatives

Nestlé often attributes its CSR efforts to a combination of ethical responsibilities, stakeholder expectations, and long-term business sustainability. The company claims that sustainable sourcing and environmental stewardship are not only social imperatives but also essential for securing supply chains and maintaining brand reputation (Nestlé, 2022). Critics, however, question whether these initiatives are primarily driven by branding and risk management rather than genuine social commitment.

Critical Evaluation of CSR Efforts

Applying Carroll’s Pyramid, Nestlé’s CSR aligns with economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities—such as providing nutritional products while ensuring regulatory compliance and engaging in philanthropy through community initiatives (Carroll, 1991). However, the depth and authenticity of such activities have faced scrutiny. For instance, the ongoing issue of water extraction in California and conflicts over water rights indicate gaps between CSR rhetoric and operational impact (Baker & Sinkula, 2019). The company’s commitment to responsible sourcing is commendable but inconsistent; reports of child labor in some supply chains persist despite commitments to eliminate such practices (Erwin et al., 2020). Furthermore, stakeholder theory suggests that true CSR should address the interests of all stakeholders, including marginalized communities and environmental groups, yet criticism persists over whether Nestlé manages these interests equitably.

Use of CSR Frameworks for Evaluation

Using GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) standards, Nestlé's sustainability reports provide detailed disclosures; however, some critics argue that the information lacks transparency and comparable benchmarks (KPMG, 2021). Moreover, media controversies, such as accusations of greenwashing or labor rights violations, cast doubt on the efficacy of the company’s CSR claims (Smith & Stewart, 2018). Therefore, while Nestlé’s CSR initiatives are extensive, their actual impact is mixed, indicating room for genuine improvement.

Recommendations for Improving CSR

To enhance its CSR effectiveness, Nestlé should increase transparency and third-party audits of its supply chains to ensure adherence to ethical standards, particularly regarding child labor and environmental impacts. Implementing a more comprehensive stakeholder engagement process can help align corporate initiatives with community needs and expectations. Borrowing from stakeholder theory, Nestlé should prioritize meaningful dialogue with marginalized groups, NGOs, and environmental advocates to refine its CSR strategies. Additionally, adopting the principles of the Circular Economy can reduce waste and resource consumption further, strengthening environmental credentials. These measures would not only promote more authentic CSR but also contribute to long-term business resilience and stakeholder trust.

Conclusion

In summary, while Nestlé demonstrates a broad commitment to CSR through its sustainability reports and initiatives like responsible sourcing and water stewardship, critical evaluation reveals gaps between policy and practice. Applying academic frameworks such as Carroll’s Pyramid and stakeholder theory indicates that nesting CSR efforts within a more transparent, stakeholder-inclusive, and environmentally innovative strategy can enhance their legitimacy and impact. Implementing the recommended improvements would enable Nestlé to better address social and environmental challenges, thereby aligning its business objectives with sustainable development goals and stakeholder expectations.

References

  • Baker, M., & Sinkula, J. (2019). Corporate sustainability and stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 789-804.
  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
  • Erwin, Z., Yusuf, S., & Anderson, M. (2020). Child labor in the global cocoa supply chain. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 56(2), 12-25.
  • KPMG. (2021). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2021. KPMG International.
  • Nestlé. (2021). Creating Shared Value Report. Nestlé S.A.
  • Nestlé. (2022). Nestlé in society: Creating Shared Value and respecting human rights. Nestlé S.A.
  • Smith, J., & Stewart, R. (2018). Greenwashing and corporate ethics: a critical perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 1050-1062.
  • World Resources Institute. (2020). Water Footprint of Nestlé. WRI Publications.
  • Yakovleva, N. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Sector. Routledge.
  • Zimmermann, B., & Blome, C. (2018). Supplier Engagement in Responsible Sourcing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 841-853.

Related Assignments