Course Project: Choose A Type Of Program Note: Please Review

Course Project: Choose a Type of Program Note: Please review the

Reflect on the types of programs and services you discovered as part of your research last week. Which of those programs or services are currently available in your institution? Which ones are not? Consider what new programs or services you would like to see offered at your institution to enhance the student experience and facilitate success for all students. How might you use assessment data to analyze the feasibility of a proposed program?

Imagine you need to develop a new program at your institution. Write a 3- to 4-page paper that addresses the following points:

  • Identify one new program for your institution.
  • Describe how you can determine the current need that exists for the program.
  • Explain how you will monitor the progress of the program if it is adopted.
  • Describe how you plan to assess the success of the program once it has been fully implemented.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Developing new programs within educational institutions is essential for fostering student success and enhancing the overall learning environment. As institutions evolve and respond to emerging student needs, careful planning and assessment are necessary to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of new initiatives. This paper explores a proposed new program—namely, a Comprehensive Academic Mentoring Program—designed to promote academic engagement, retention, and success among students at my institution. The process of assessing the need for this program, planning for its monitoring, and evaluating its success is outlined to demonstrate a comprehensive approach to program development and implementation.

Identifying the Need for the Program

Assessing the need for a new program involves analyzing current institutional data, student feedback, and academic performance metrics. In my institution, data indicates a concerning trend of declining retention rates among first-year students, particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds. Surveys and focus groups consistently reveal that students often feel overwhelmed, unsupported, or disconnected from academic resources. These findings suggest a pressing need for targeted support structures that foster academic engagement from the outset of students’ college journey.

To further substantiate the need, institutional data such as course completion rates, academic probation statistics, and graduation rates should be reviewed. For example, if a significant percentage of students are not meeting grade point average (GPA) benchmarks in their initial semesters, it underscores the importance of early intervention programs. Additionally, consultation with faculty, academic advisors, and student services staff can provide qualitative insights into student challenges and gaps in support services.

Monitoring the Progress of the Program

Once the program—specifically, a Comprehensive Academic Mentoring Program—is adopted, establishing a systematic approach to monitor its progress is essential. Key performance indicators (KPIs) must be defined, including student participation rates, academic performance improvements, retention and graduation rates, and student satisfaction levels. Data collection methods such as surveys, focus groups, and academic performance tracking must be employed at regular intervals, such as end of semester and annual reviews.

Additionally, the program’s implementation processes should be evaluated continuously through formative assessments. For example, collecting feedback from mentors and mentees through surveys or interviews helps identify strengths and areas for improvement. Tracking engagement metrics, such as attendance at mentoring sessions or utilization of support resources, provides quantitative data that can be analyzed to determine the program’s effectiveness and areas needing adjustment.

Assessing the Success of the Program

Assessing program success requires a comprehensive evaluation strategy once the program is fully operational. Quantitative measures include changes in retention rates, GPA improvements, reduction in academic probation, and overall graduation rates. Comparing these metrics to baseline data collected prior to program implementation offers insight into the program's impact.

Qualitative assessment complements this data through student and mentor feedback, which reveals perceptions of support, engagement levels, and personal growth. Conducting focus groups and satisfaction surveys at the end of each academic year allows for capturing nuanced student experiences. Moreover, long-term tracking of alumni success and career placement rates can provide insight into how the program influences ongoing academic and professional achievements.

Finally, applying assessment data involves analyzing the results, identifying strengths and gaps, and making evidence-based decisions for program refinement. For instance, if data shows low participation among certain student groups, targeted outreach can be implemented, or program components can be adjusted to enhance inclusivity and effectiveness.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the development of a new academic support program requires a strategic approach grounded in data and continuous evaluation. By systematically identifying the need, implementing monitoring mechanisms, and assessing outcomes, institutions can ensure that their programs effectively meet student needs and foster academic success. The proposed Comprehensive Academic Mentoring Program exemplifies a proactive step towards creating an inclusive, supportive educational environment. Such initiatives are vital for promoting equity, retention, and overall student achievement in today’s diverse higher education landscape.

References

  • Albashiry, N. M., Voogt, J. M., & Pieters, J. M. (2016). Maintaining Curriculum Consistency of Technical and Vocational Educational Programs through Teacher Design Teams. Man in India, 96(1).
  • Lewallen, T. C., Hunt, H., Potts-Datema, W., Zaza, S., & Giles, W. (2015). The whole school, whole community, whole child model: A new approach for improving educational attainment and healthy development for students. Journal of School Health, 85(11).
  • Oudshoorn, M. J., Clear, A., Carter, J., Abandoh-Sam, J. A., Gonsalvez, C., Hitchcock, L., & Pearce, J. L. (2017). Integrating International Students into Computer Science Programs: Challenges and Strategies for Success. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education.
  • Stiglitz, J. E., & Rosengard, J. K. (2015). Economics of the public sector: Fourth international student edition. WW Norton & Company.
  • Harper, C. E., & Quaye, S. J. (2007). Student Engagement and Black Undergraduate Student Experiences at a Predominantly White University. Review of Higher Education, 31(3).
  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). What Is Student Engagement? Presence in Education, 9.
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1).
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. University of Chicago Press.
  • Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press.

Related Assignments