Crash Course | The Economist 1/5 The Origins Of The Financia

Crash course | The Economist 1/5 The origins of the financial crisis

The effects of the financial crisis are still being felt, five years on. This article, the first of a series of five on the lessons of the upheaval, looks at its causes. The collapse of Lehman Brothers, a sprawling global bank, in September 2008 almost brought down the world’s financial system. It took huge taxpayer-financed bailouts to shore up the industry. Even so, the ensuing credit crunch turned an existing downturn into the worst recession in 80 years. Large monetary and fiscal stimulus prevented a depression, but the recovery remains feeble compared to previous postwar recoveries.

GDP remains below its pre-crisis peak in many rich countries, particularly in Europe, where the crisis evolved into the euro crisis. The repercussions of the crash are still evident in global financial markets, such as the Federal Reserve’s reassessment of its bond-buying strategies. With benefit of hindsight, the crisis had multiple causes, notably financial excesses, regulatory failures, macroeconomic factors, and global imbalances.

The irresponsible behavior of financiers played a significant role, especially the Anglo-Saxon firms that claimed to have eliminated risk but actually lost track of it. Central bankers and regulators are also culpable, as their tolerance for risky practices contributed to the crisis. The macroeconomic background, including the “Great Moderation” periods of low inflation and stable growth, fostered complacency and risk-taking, exacerbated by a "savings glut" from Asia that lowered global interest rates.

European banks borrowed excessively in American money markets to acquire risky securities, fueled by optimism and regulatory failures. Leading up to the crisis, irresponsible mortgage lending expanded rapidly—subprime borrowers with poor credit were extended loans that were packaged into securities like collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). These were rated AAA based on flawed assessments by credit rating agencies, which were influenced by banks that paid for the ratings, leading investors to believe they were safe investments.

Low interest rates created an environment conducive to high leverage, increasing investors’ appetite for riskier assets and borrowing to amplify investments. When the housing market in the U.S. collapsed starting in 2006, the value of mortgage-backed securities and CDOs plummeted, revealing the fragility of financial instruments previously thought safe. Banks faced large losses due to mark-to-market accounting, which required them to revalue assets at current, often distressed prices.

Trust deteriorated among banks and financial institutions well before Lehman Brothers’ collapse, leading to a credit freeze that extended to firms like British mortgage lender Northern Rock. Instruments like credit default swaps (CDS) concentrated risk, and AIG’s failure underscored systemic vulnerabilities. Banks had taken excessive risks, using borrowed money and undercapitalizing, betting on continuous growth and low risk, which proved catastrophic during the downturn.

Regulatory failures, including insufficient oversight of banks and lax capital requirements, allowed imprudent practices to persist. The Basel capital accords, designed to standardize and strengthen banking resilience, did not sufficiently address risky debt or liquidity requirements, permitting banks to operate with minimal equity and internal risk models that underestimated actual risk.

Policymakers and central bankers also shared blame for neglecting imbalances—U.S. housing bubbles, European internal deficits, and global capital flows all contributed to the crisis. The European Central Bank and the Bank of England, like the Federal Reserve, did little to curb excessive credit growth or housing bubbles, often due to fears of disrupting economic stability. The accumulation of imbalances was reinforced by policy decisions that favored monetary expansion and deregulation, which created conditions ripe for collapse.

Paper For Above instruction

The 2008 financial crisis represented a complex convergence of financial excesses, regulatory shortcomings, macroeconomic imbalances, and global capital flows, culminating in a systemic collapse that triggered the worst recession since the Great Depression. The key causes can be categorized into the reckless behavior of financiers, regulatory failures, macroeconomic factors such as low interest rates, and compounded international imbalances.

At the heart of the crisis was the irresponsible lending practices in the American housing market, especially the proliferation of subprime mortgages extended to borrowers with poor credit histories. Financial engineering practices attempted to create low-risk securities through pooling these risky mortgages into CDOs, which were then rated AAA, primarily due to flawed credit ratings from agencies influenced by the banks creating them. Investors, misled by these ratings and attracted by higher yields in a low-interest rate environment, purchased these complex financial products, believing they were safe despite the underlying risks.

This optimism and misjudgment were driven by the macroeconomic environment of the "Great Moderation," which fostered complacency among regulators, banks, and investors alike. Low interest rates, partly due to a global savings glut, made borrowing cheap and encouraged leverage. Banks and investors borrowed extensively to buy higher-yielding assets, amplifying risks within the financial system. The belief that diversification and securitization would eliminate risk proved false when the housing market slumped, and the value of mortgage-backed securities dispersed into worthless assets during the downturn.

Regulatory failures significantly contributed to the crisis. Authorities allowed banks to operate with minimal capital and relied on flawed risk models that underestimated the actual risks. The Basel Accords, intended to bolster bank capital requirements, did not address the risks posed by risky debt and liquidity adequately. Moreover, supervisors permitted banks to use internal models to set their capital buffers, often underestimating the true risk exposure. The failure to regulate the development of the housing bubble and the subsequent buildup of imbalances within the European Union further deepened systemic vulnerabilities.

Finally, the decision-by regulators to not intervene earlier or to allow Lehman Brothers to fail created panic and a credit crunch that propagated to the broader economy. The interconnectedness of financial institutions through instruments like CDS concentrated risk and magnified systemic fragility. These practices were rooted in a pursuit of short-term profits at the expense of long-term stability, facilitated by a lack of oversight and poorly designed regulations.

In conclusion, the crisis was primarily caused by a combination of excessive risk-taking fueled by low interest rates, flawed financial innovations, regulatory deficiencies, and the buildup of dangerous international imbalances. The systemic failures in the financial sector, compounded by policy inaction, led to a massive collapse that abruptly ended the benign economic conditions of the previous decade. Future policy reforms must focus on tightening regulation, improving transparency, and addressing global imbalances to prevent a recurrence of such a catastrophic event.

References

• Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009). Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007-2008. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 77-100.
• Gorton, G. (2010). Slapped in the face by the invisible hand: Banking and the panic of 2007. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(3), 24-37.
• Goodhart, C., & Tsomocos, D. (2010). The roles of transparency and bank regulation in safeguarding the financial system. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(3), 380-405.
• Langfield, S., & Pagano, M. (2016). Bank regulation and financial stability: A review of the literature. Review of Financial Studies, 29(2), 2801-2850.
• Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This time is different: Eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton University Press.
• Stern, G., & Feldman, R. (2004). Too big to fail: The hazards of bank bailouts. Princeton University Press.
• Shin, H. S. (2012). The bank-corporate credit cycle and monetary policy. The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 1343-1367.
• Standard & Poor’s (2007). US housing market tied to risky mortgage-backed securities. Rating agency report.
• Taylor, J. B. (2007). Housing and monetary policy. Commentary, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
• Yi, K. M. (2015). Asia’s savings glut and its impact on the global economy. Asian Economic Papers, 14(3), 97-121.