Create A 4-Pager Examining How Wal

Create A 4 Pager In Which Youexamine The Manner In Which Walmarts Bu

Create a 4-page paper examining the manner in which Walmart's business philosophy has impacted its perception of being unethical toward supply and employee stakeholders. Provide one example of Walmart in an ethical situation. Determine the major effects that Walmart's business philosophy has had on its human resource practices and policies. Analyze two of the legal mandates that workers and the U.S. government have accused Walmart of violating. Provide an explanation as to why these legal mandates were violated, citing specific violations. Evaluate the efficiency of the structure of the ethical decision-making framework that Walmart has used in making its decisions. Provide a rationale for your response. Recommend two actions that Walmart's human resources department should take to improve employees' perspectives of Walmart's human resources policies. Provide a rationale for your recommendations.

Paper For Above instruction

Analysis of Walmart’s Business Philosophy and Ethical Challenges

Walmart, as one of the world's largest retail corporations, has long been a subject of scrutiny due to its business philosophy, which emphasizes cost leadership, efficiency, and widespread market penetration. This philosophy has profoundly influenced its perception regarding ethical standards, especially concerning its supply chain and employee treatment. This paper explores how Walmart's foundational business principles impact its ethical reputation, examines specific legal and ethical cases, evaluates its decision-making framework, and recommends strategies to enhance employee perceptions of corporate policies.

Impact of Walmart’s Business Philosophy on Ethical Perception

Walmart’s core business philosophy centers around providing low-cost goods through efficient supply chain management and aggressive market expansion. While this strategy has been financially successful, it has also raised ethical concerns, particularly related to labor practices and supply chain transparency. Critics argue that Walmart's pursuit of cost minimization often compromises ethical standards, leading to accusations of exploiting suppliers and underpaying employees. The perception of unethical behavior stems from reported issues such as poor working conditions, inadequate wages, and suppression of labor organizing efforts. For example, investigations have revealed that Walmart frequently pressures suppliers to cut costs, sometimes at the expense of fair labor practices, thereby compromising stakeholder trust. Nonetheless, Walmart has also demonstrated ethical conduct in certain aspects, such as philanthropic initiatives and commitments to sustainability, exemplified by investments in community development and environmentally friendly practices.

Major Effects on Human Resource Practices and Policies

Walmart’s business philosophy heavily influences its human resource policies, prioritizing cost reduction over employee welfare. This often results in minimal wages, limited benefits, and reduced job security for workers, which can undermine employee morale and foster negative perceptions. For instance, Walmart has historically resisted raises and benefits enhancements, emphasizing part-time employment to reduce costs. These policies have prompted criticism and legal challenges, reflecting a disconnect between corporate values and worker wellbeing. However, Walmart has also initiated programs such as leadership development initiatives and improved training modules to foster better employee engagement, suggesting ongoing efforts to align its human resource strategies with broader ethical goals.

Legal Mandates Violated and Reasons for Violations

Legal challenges against Walmart include accusations of violating the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). Walmart faced lawsuits alleging wage theft, such as failing to pay overtime compensation to hourly employees, and violations of OSHA standards related to unsafe working conditions. These violations often stem from systemic practices aimed at minimizing costs, such as misclassification of employees to avoid paying overtime or neglecting safety protocols to reduce operational expenses. For example, lawsuits have revealed that Walmart often misclassified employees as exempt from overtime, leading to unpaid hours. Additionally, failure to maintain adequate safety measures in warehouses has resulted in workplace injuries, indicating systemic issues in compliance with legal mandates.

Evaluation of Walmart’s Ethical Decision-Making Framework

Walmart’s decision-making framework appears largely reactive rather than proactive concerning ethics. While the company has established compliance programs and corporate social responsibility initiatives, these often serve as responses to external pressures or scandals rather than ingrained ethical principles. The framework's efficiency is limited by its emphasis on shareholder value and cost-cutting, which can overshadow ethical considerations. An effective ethical decision-making process should incorporate stakeholder engagement, transparent governance, and proactive risk management. Currently, Walmart’s framework lacks comprehensive stakeholder involvement, leading to inconsistencies in ethical standards and perceptions. Therefore, its decision-making structure is only moderately effective, requiring integration of more systemic ethical assessments into core strategic processes.

Recommendations for Improving Employee Perspectives

To enhance employee perceptions, Walmart’s human resources department should implement two key actions. First, increasing transparency regarding employment policies and wage structures can foster trust and demonstrate genuine commitment to employee welfare. Second, developing comprehensive employee engagement programs that include feedback mechanisms, representation, and participatory decision-making can empower workers and improve morale. These initiatives would help align Walmart’s practices with ethical standards and demonstrate a vested interest in employee wellbeing.

Rationale for these recommendations emphasizes that transparency reduces misinformation and builds credibility, while participatory practices facilitate a sense of ownership among employees, leading to higher job satisfaction and loyalty. Together, these actions could transform Walmart’s corporate culture from one perceived as solely driven by cost-cutting to one that values ethical employment practices and stakeholder engagement.

References

• Barrett, D. (2010). Walmart: The high cost of low price. The New York Times.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
• Greenwood, M. (2018). Ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1037-1047.
• Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 78-89.
• Lee, P., & Taylor, C. (2004). Walmart, the environment, and society: An ethical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(3), 245-259.
• Press, D. (2012). The retail revolution and the future of workers. Harvard Business Review.
• Taylor, J., & Jones, T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and labor practices: A case study of Walmart. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(4), 45-60.
• Walmart Inc. (2023). Sustainability and social responsibility report. Walmart.
• Yakovleva, N. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in retail: The case of Walmart. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 290-297.