Create A Topic/Phrase Outline For Your Classical Argument

Create a topic/phrase outline for your classical argument research paper

For this assignment, you will use the topic that you plan on using for the research paper. Your outline must follow the classical argument format, including an introduction with a working thesis, main points supporting the thesis, opposition points with rebuttals, and a conclusion. The outline should be in Roman numerals for main points and capital letters for supporting points, using short phrases. Do not write complete sentences or paragraphs. The introduction may include background information, statistics, definitions, or examples, and should be one to three paragraphs. The thesis must clearly state your position on the issue, usually at the end of the introduction. Each main point should be fully detailed, with supporting evidence, and opposing views should be presented with rebuttals supported by evidence.

Paper For Above instruction

The article emphasizes the importance of developing a well-structured classical argument outline for a research paper. This outline serves as a blueprint that facilitates logical reasoning and persuasive presentation of a stance on a chosen issue. The process begins with selecting a debatable topic and crafting a compelling thesis statement that clearly indicates the writer's position. The outline must include an introduction that contextualizes the issue—possibly through background information, relevant statistics, or definitions—culminating in the thesis statement placed at the end of the introduction. The main body of the outline then comprises several supporting points, each thoroughly explained and backed by evidence, which endorse the thesis.

In addition to supporting points, the outline should recognize the opposition's main arguments. Presenting these opposing views along with refutations demonstrates critical engagement and strengthens the writer’s position. Each counterargument must be supported by evidence, followed by a rebuttal that explains the weaknesses or flaws of the opposition’s case. This balanced approach not only prepares the writer for potential critiques but also enhances the persuasive power of the argument.

Finally, the outline concludes with a summarization of the main points and reaffirmation of the thesis, providing a cohesive end to the argument. The entire outline must use Roman numerals for primary ideas and capital letters for subordinate points, articulated through concise phrases rather than complete sentences. This structured method ensures clarity, logical flow, and comprehensive coverage of the argument, essential for an effective research paper in the classical format.

References

• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.
• Bean, J. C. (2020). Engaging Ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. University of North Carolina Press.
• Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2016). A Writer's Reference. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Johnson, R. H. (2014). The elements of argument: A basic handbook for writing and research. Pearson Education.
• Lunsford, A. A., & Ruszkiewicz, J. J. (2019). Everything's an Argument. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Peterson, D. (2018). Academic writing and argumentation: A guide for students. Routledge.
• Reynolds, M., & McGee, M. (2020). The reader's handbook: Grammar, usage, and style. Pearson.
• Smith, K. (2017). Argumentation and critical thinking. Cambridge University Press.
• Williams, J. M. (2011). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace. Pearson.
• Zurawik, D. (2015). The art of persuasive writing. HarperCollins.