Create Two Columns To Compare The TotScores
Create Two Columns to Compare the Totscores and Totscores
In a separate document, create two columns to compare the totscores (total scores) and the tot_tscores (total t-scores). Please use the following grade breakdown to rank the assignment grade scores 1 through 12, where 1 is the highest score A, and 12 the lowest score F:
- A to rank 1
- B to rank 2
- B– to rank 3
- C+ to rank 4
- C to ranks 5, 6, 7, and 8
- C– to rank 9
- D+ to rank 10
- D to rank 11
- F to rank 12
Paper For Above instruction
The primary goal of this analysis is to compare two types of scores—totscores and tot_tscores—by creating a clear, organized visual representation in a document with two columns. The comparison facilitates understanding of how these scores relate across different grading categories, according to a specified ranking system.
To effectively achieve this, one must first compile the data for each student or assessment into a structured format. The scores should be listed side by side: the totscores on one side and the tot_tscores on the other. This dual-column approach enhances clarity and allows for straightforward comparison between the two scoring methods.
The ranking system designated assigns numerical ranks from 1 to 12 to letter grades, where 1 corresponds to the highest grade, A, and 12 to the lowest, F. The assignment specifies how to map letter grades to numerical ranks, which is essential for analyzing performance patterns across the grading spectrum. For instance, an 'A' score equates to rank 1, representing top performance, while an 'F' score corresponds to rank 12, indicating the lowest performance.
In constructing the comparison, it is crucial to accurately interpret the original scores and convert any letter grades into their numerical rankings based on the provided breakdown. This conversion allows for a quantitative analysis of trends, such as consistency between totscores and tot_tscores or identifying discrepancies that might signal differences in scoring interpretations.
Once the data is organized into two columns, and grades are ranked accordingly, visual tools such as charts or tables can be employed to illustrate the relationship between the two score types. This visual comparison can highlight correlations, variations, or outliers, which are invaluable for educators or assessment analysts seeking insights into grading behaviors or scoring patterns.
Overall, creating a clear, accurate comparison of totscores and tot_tscores within a two-column document, coupled with the systematic ranking of scores, provides a comprehensive overview essential for evaluating scoring consistency and performance benchmarking across different assessment metrics.
References
- Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (6th ed.). Pearson.
- Heinrich, C. J. (2014). Assessment, Measurement, and Evaluation: AQA. Sage Publications.
- Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching (8th ed.). Pearson.
- McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction (6th ed.). Pearson.
- Stiggins, R. J. (2014). Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right—Using It Well. Prentice Hall.
- Popham, W. J. (2014). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice (6th ed.). Pearson.
- Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. ASCD.
- Crooks, T. J. (2001). The Validity and Reliability of Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(2), 42-51.
- Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. (2014). An Introduction to Classroom Assessment: Understanding and Using Assessment to Improve Student Learning. Pearson.
- Pearson, L. W., & Gallagher, M. (1983). The Assessment of Student Performance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(3), 259-274.