Create Your Own PDP Build A Professional Development Plan
Create Your Own Pdpbuild A Professional Development Plan For Yourself
Create your own PDP Build a Professional Development Plan for yourself, focused on your selected competency Decide on a Foundation/Practice Dimension and a single Competency What are your strengths and challenges Assign yourself a proficiency level from the Rubrics Select 1-3 KSAs from TAP 21 to target Define the goal you want to achieve Create a list of activities to be completed Identify how progress will be measured Determine a deadline date for each activity.
Paper For Above instruction
Developing a comprehensive Professional Development Plan (PDP) is essential for ongoing growth and improvement in any professional field. This plan should be tailored to individual strengths, challenges, and specific competencies relevant to one's career. In this paper, I will outline my approach to creating a PDP by selecting a foundation/practice dimension and a competency, assessing my current proficiency level, setting targeted goals, and designing actionable activities with measurable outcomes and deadlines.
Firstly, selecting the foundation/practice dimension and a specific competency provides a focused framework for development. For this plan, I have chosen the dimension of "Instructional Strategies" and the competency "Designing Engaging Learning Experiences." This focus is vital because fostering engaging learning environments directly impacts student success and motivation.
Next, an honest self-assessment of strengths and challenges informs the development process. My strengths include creativity and adaptability, which enable me to incorporate diverse instructional strategies effectively. However, I face challenges in time management, often struggling to allocate sufficient planning time for engaging activities. Recognizing these aspects allows me to tailor my development focus accordingly.
Assigning a proficiency level based on established rubrics provides a clear baseline. Currently, I am classified at a "Developing" level, indicating that I am implementing some engaging strategies but require further refinement and consistency. This assessment guides the selection of targeted KSAs (Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes) from TAP 21 that align with my growth areas.
From TAP 21, I have selected three KSAs: 1) "Designing Instruction," 2) "Implementing Instruction," and 3) "Assessing Student Learning." These areas are crucial for advancing my ability to create, deliver, and evaluate engaging learning experiences.
The primary goal of this PDP is to enhance my competency in designing and implementing engaging instructional activities that foster deeper student engagement and understanding within three months. Specifically, I aim to develop a repository of innovative strategies and apply them consistently in my classroom.
To achieve this, I will undertake specific activities such as researching and reviewing instructional design models, attending relevant professional development workshops, and creating instructional materials that employ active learning techniques. I will measure progress by tracking the number of new strategies implemented, collecting student feedback, and monitoring engagement levels through observational assessments.
Each activity will have a clear deadline to maintain accountability. For example, I intend to complete my review of instructional design literature within two weeks, attend a workshop within six weeks, and develop a set of three new lesson plans incorporating engaging strategies within eight weeks. Regular reflection and self-evaluation will help monitor ongoing progress, ensuring that I stay aligned with my development goals.
In conclusion, a well-structured PDP tailored to my strengths, challenges, and targeted competencies serves as a roadmap for continuous professional growth. By systematically planning activities, setting measurable outcomes, and adhering to deadlines, I can steadily improve my instructional practices, ultimately benefiting my students and enriching my professional journey.
References
American Institutes for Research. (2013). TAP System for teacher and leader effectiveness. https://www.tapsystem.org/
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536-553.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Marzano, R. J. (2012). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. ASCD.
Xu, Z. (2010). Improving instructional quality through teacher professional development. Journal of Education, 190(2), 89-100.
Zhao, Y. (2012). Discovering authentic talent: The failure of the American school system. Educational Leadership, 70(8), 12-17.