Creativity Sternberg Defines Creativity As A Drive Resulting

Creativitysternberg Defines Creativity As A Drive Resulting In The Pro

Creativity Sternberg defines creativity as a drive resulting in the production of something “both original and worthwhile” (Walden University, LLC, 2007). He suggests that creative people demonstrate non-conforming attitudes toward commonly held societal conventions that hamper their creative pursuits, as well as demonstrating a consistent drive to attend to their creative interests. Creative individuals also show a willingness to take risks as well as criticism in the interest of improving their creative work. For this discussion, consider the arguments made in the video in this week’s learning resources. Think about ways that you have addressed problems, in particular the level of creativity you may have brought to solutions.

Consider whether individuals can increase their own levels of creativity. Reference: Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2007). Creativity. Baltimore, MD: Author. Be sure to review the learning resources before completing this activity.

Paper For Above instruction

Creativity is a fundamental aspect of human cognition and problem-solving, which enables individuals to generate novel and valuable solutions in various contexts. According to Sternberg (2006), creativity is not merely an innate trait but a drive that propels individuals toward producing outputs that are both original and worthwhile. This perspective emphasizes that creativity involves a dynamic interplay between motivation, attitude, and external circumstances, allowing individuals to overcome societal conventions that may hinder innovative thinking. In my personal experience, I have encountered a challenge related to optimizing my study schedule for better productivity. Initially, I adhered to traditional time management methods, which did not account for my fluctuating energy levels throughout the day. Recognizing the need for a more creative approach, I devised a flexible schedule that incorporated short breaks, varied study locations, and diversified learning methods, such as incorporating multimedia tools. This solution demonstrated creativity by moving beyond conventional routines, leading to enhanced engagement and retention. Such an experience aligns with Sternberg's (2006) assertion that creative effort involves risk-taking and non-conformity to established norms.

The notion that creativity can be enhanced is supported by numerous psychological studies. Dane et al. (2011) argue that creativity is not solely a fixed trait but can be cultivated through deliberate strategies such as encouraging divergent thinking, reducing fear of failure, and fostering an environment that stimulates curiosity and risk-taking. For instance, brainstorming sessions, exposure to diverse stimuli, and collaborative problem-solving have been shown to stimulate creative cognition. These strategies enhance the brain's capacity to forge new associations, thus increasing an individual's creative potential. Moreover, research by Green et al. (2012) indicates that engaging in analogical reasoning and other analogy-based tasks activates neural pathways associated with creative insights, suggesting an underlying neuroplasticity that can be nurtured.

Conversely, some scholars contend that creativity has innate components that cannot be entirely cultivated through external means (Runco, 2004). However, evidence suggests that while innate talents may influence initial creative potential, environmental factors, encouragement, and practice significantly influence the development of higher levels of creativity over time. For instance, fostering a growth mindset and providing opportunities for creative problem-solving can lead to measurable improvements in creative thinking skills (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2007). As such, it is plausible—and supported by empirical data—that individuals can indeed increase their levels of creativity through intentional activities and supportive environments.

In conclusion, creativity is both a drive and a skill set that individuals can develop and enhance. While innate talents may play a role, the evidence strongly indicates that deliberate effort, environmental factors, and strategic practices significantly contribute to increasing one's creative abilities. Recognizing this potential provides motivation for creating conditions conducive to creative growth, which can be beneficial in both personal and professional domains (Sternberg, 2006; Dane et al., 2011). Therefore, nurturing creativity should be regarded as a dynamic and attainable process, accessible to all willing to engage in intentional development practices.

References

• Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79.
• Dane, E., Baer, M., Pratt, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2011). Rational versus intuitive problem solving: How thinking “off the beaten path” can stimulate creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 3–12.
• Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J. M., Fugelsang, J. A., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2012). Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 264–272.
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.
• Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2007). Creativity. Baltimore, MD: Author.