Crime Analysis Requires Establishing Value Out Of Data Offic

Crime Analysis Requires Establishing Value Out Of Data Officer Johnso

Crime analysis relies heavily on the effective extraction, interpretation, and integration of data from various sources to understand patterns, identify suspects, and prevent future crimes. In cases involving digital evidence, such as a cell phone in possession of a burglary suspect, the value of the data depends on what information can be retrieved and how it can contribute to the investigation. Additionally, open-source intelligence (OSINT) plays a crucial role in supplementing digital evidence with contextual information from publicly available sources.

When analyzing a cell phone belonging to a burglary suspect, several types of valuable data can be downloaded to aid the investigation. First, call logs and text message histories can reveal communication patterns with accomplices or potential targets. Contact lists provide insight into acquaintances, known associates, or other persons of interest. GPS location data and geotagged photos can track the suspect's movements, identifying places frequented, including recent burglary locations or other relevant sites. App data, including social media accounts and messaging platforms, can yield additional intelligence, revealing the suspect's network, plans, or recent activities. Browser histories and stored media files might also contain clues such as plans, stolen items, or contact information.

After extracting data from the cell phone, open-source tools and resources can be utilized to further enhance the investigation. Public records databases, such as property records, vehicle registrations, and court records, can provide background information on individuals associated with the suspect. Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram often contain publicly available data, posts, location check-ins, and photographs that can link individuals to specific locations or activities. Mapping tools and publicly available geospatial data can be employed to analyze movement patterns or identify addresses associated with the suspect.

Open-source intelligence (OSINT) tools like Maltego, TweetDeck, or Search Engine queries (e.g., Google, Bing) enable investigators to uncover relationships, chitchat, and publicly shared information that might not be evident from digital device data alone. Monitoring online forums, marketplaces, and classified ad sites can also uncover connections to stolen property or illicit transactions. Furthermore, local news websites and community forums can provide context about recent criminal activity or alert residents to ongoing investigations. The combination of digital evidence from the suspect's cell phone and information gathered through open sources creates a comprehensive picture that enhances the effectiveness of crime analysis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, establishing the value of data obtained from a suspect’s cell phone involves extracting communication records, location data, app information, and media files that can reveal patterns, relationships, and activities related to the crime. Complementing this data with open-source intelligence significantly strengthens the analysis, offering contextual insights from publicly available records, social media, geospatial data, and online resources. This integrated approach facilitates a more informed and strategic response to criminal activity, ultimately aiding law enforcement in solving cases and preventing future crimes.

References

  • Brunton, F., & Nissenbaum, H. (2015). Obfuscation: A User’s Guide for Privacy and Protest. MIT Press.
  • Cohen, D., & Murphy, J. (2021). Open-source intelligence (OSINT) techniques for law enforcement. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 16(4), 45-58.
  • Garfinkel, S. (2012). Digital Forensics Research: The Next 10 Years. IEEE Computer Society.
  • Hutchings, A., & Hough, M. (2018). The role of social media in criminal investigations. Criminal Justice Studies, 31(1), 55-68.
  • Koh, Y., & Tan, H. (2019). Utilizing geospatial data for crime analysis. Journal of Crime Mapping, 3(2), 105-122.
  • Rogers, M. K., & Seigfried-Spellar, K. C. (2018). Digital crimes and forensics: An overview. International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics, 10(3), 1-9.
  • Rosen, J. (2010). The end of the global security state?. Harvard University Press.
  • Shirazi, E., & Alavi, S. (2020). Using social media data for criminal investigations: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 15(4), 31-42.
  • Wallace, R. (2013). Forensic computing: A practitioners’ guide. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Williamson, T., & Caruana, C. (2017). Digital evidence and investigation techniques. IEEE Software, 34(2), 89-92.

Related Assignments