Criminal Investigation Respond To This Student's Post With Y

Criminal Investigationrespond To This Students Post With Your Though

Criminal Investigation: Respond to this student's post with your thoughts in at least 100 words: "Determine the fundamental difference between interrogating and interviewing under the circumstance of criminal investigation. Provide one (1) example of a situation or scenario when each of these would be used. Information is obtained continuously throughout an investigation. Some is volunteered, and some the police officer must really work for; some is useful and some worthless or even misleading. Interviewing involves talking to people, questioning them, obtaining information, and reading between the lines. The main sources of information at the crime scene are the complainant, the victim, and witnesses. Interview witnesses separately if possible. Interview the victim or complainant first, then eye witnesses and then the people who did not actually see the crime but who have relevant information. Questioning suspects is usually more difficult than questioning witnesses or victims. Once identified and located, a person who is involved in a crime may make a statement, admission or confession that corroborated with independent evidence, can produce a guilty plea or obtain a conviction. An example of a situation when each of these would be used is during a murder investigation. * From the e-Activity, and based on Figure 7.5 Linear Use-of-force Continuum in Chapter 7 of the textbook, support or critique the argument that a police officer should use an Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) and / or taser before the utilization of deadly force when making arrests. Provide a rationale to support your response. I support the argument that police officers should use an Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) and/or taser before the utilization of deadly force when making arrests because all life is important. ECMs help subdue the suspect when they begin resisting arrest or show signs of posing a physical threat towards the arresting officers."

Paper For Above instruction

Criminal investigations are complex processes that require distinct approaches to interview and interrogate individuals involved in a crime. Understanding the fundamental difference between these two techniques is essential for effective law enforcement. Interviews are typically non-accusatory and aim to gather information from witnesses, victims, or suspects, often through open-ended questions that encourage voluntary disclosure. For example, during a murder investigation, police might interview witnesses separately to collect their accounts of the crime. This approach helps avoid contamination of testimonies and promotes honest responses. On the other hand, interrogations are more focused and accusatory, directed at suspects with the goal of obtaining confessions or admissions that can establish guilt or innocence. An example scenario for an interrogation would be questioning a suspect who has been identified through investigative leads and then interrogated to determine their involvement in the crime.

In regard to the use of force, especially when considering the application of Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) or tasers, many law enforcement professionals advocate for their use prior to deadly force. The Linear Use-of-force Continuum suggests escalating response levels, emphasizing the importance of least-lethal options. ECM devices and tasers serve as non-lethal alternatives that can effectively subdue resistant suspects without risking life unnecessarily. Employing these devices aligns with the principle that all human life is valuable and that officers should prioritize interventions that minimize harm. Research has shown that tasers are generally safer and more effective than firearms in controlling subjects resisting arrest (Folsom & Hart, 2015). However, critics argue that tasers can sometimes cause injuries or be misused, emphasizing the need for proper training and adherence to departmental policies to ensure their appropriate deployment (Pinals et al., 2018). Overall, the strategic use of ECMs and tasers offers a safeguard for both officers and suspects, promoting safer arrest procedures.

In conclusion, distinguishing between interviewing and interrogating is crucial for effective criminal investigations. Utilizing less-lethal force options like tasers aligns with modern law enforcement goals of minimizing injury and preserving life while maintaining order and safety during arrests. Proper protocols and training are essential to maximize the benefits of these tools and uphold ethical standards in policing.

References

• Folsom, R. E., & Hart, C. (2015). Use of force: Leadership, policy, and training. Routledge.
• Pinals, D. S., Swanson, J. W., & Swartz, M. S. (2018). Taser-related injuries and law enforcement use: An ethical review. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(2), 302–308.
• Police Executive Research Forum. (2016). National evaluation of law enforcement use of tasers. PERF.
• Borum, R., & DeVoe, J. (2014). The use of less-lethal weapons in police operations. Journal of Public Safety, 4(2), 112-123.
• Levine, R., & Campbell, R. (2013). Law enforcement use of force: An analysis and policy review. Law Enforcement Journal, 46(3), 45–59.
• Santoro, J., & Blumberg, D. (2017). Dissecting police use of tasers: Safety, effectiveness, and policies. Criminal Justice Studies, 30(4), 341–355.
• Stoughton, S. W. (2018). The ethics of non-lethal weapons in policing. Journal of Law & Ethics in Criminal Practice, 2(1), 35–52.
• Gorniak, M. (2017). The impact of taser use in law enforcement: A review of the literature. Police Quarterly, 20(2), 151–172.
• Walker, S., & Katz, C. (2018). The Police in America: An Introduction. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Williams, J. (2019). Balancing safety and human rights: The evolving role of force in policing. International Journal of Crime, Law and Society, 44, 123–134.