Critical Thinking: Go Back To Your First Journey

Instructionscritical Thinkinggo Back To Your Very First Journal Entry

Critical Thinking go back to your very first journal entry – review your definition of critical thinking. After studying critical thinking for the past eight weeks, would you change your definition in any way? If yes, how and why? If no – if it was perfect – what parts of the text were best reflected in your definition?

Recall in your first journal entry that you discussed the authors' statement that the concepts in Chapters 12, 13 and 14 were "the heart of the matter." After having studied those chapters, answer again, with renewed understanding, the question posed there: Why do you think the authors find these concepts important to critical thinking?

The lecture claims that an argument is no good unless it has a "strong and reasoned ethical base." Do you agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument? If yes, why? If no, why not?

Do you believe that you now know everything you need to know about critical thinking – or is learning to think critically a life-long task? Explain your answer.

Length-2 pages APA Format

Paper For Above instruction

Critical thinking is an essential skill that facilitates effective decision-making, problem-solving, and rational analysis in various aspects of life. Initially, my definition of critical thinking centered on the ability to analyze information objectively, question assumptions, and evaluate evidence to reach logical conclusions. Over the past eight weeks, through deep engagement with the course materials, discussions, and practical exercises, I have refined this definition. I now understand that critical thinking also involves a conscious awareness of biases, emotional influences, and the social context that can affect reasoning processes. Therefore, I would modify my original definition to encompass not only analytical and evaluative capacities but also metacognitive awareness—being mindful of one’s own thinking patterns and potential distortions.

In my initial journal entry, I discussed the authors' assertion that concepts in Chapters 12, 13, and 14 represent "the heart of the matter" in critical thinking. Having studied these chapters, I appreciate why these concepts are foundational. Chapter 12 emphasizes the importance of intellectual humility and open-mindedness, which foster receptivity to alternative viewpoints and prevent dogmatism. Chapter 13 underscores the significance of evidence-based reasoning and the need to distinguish between valid and invalid arguments, which secures the integrity of our conclusions. Chapter 14 highlights the role of ethical considerations in decision-making, stressing that reasoning should be guided by moral principles and social responsibility. These concepts, I now realize, are central because they mitigate cognitive biases, promote fairness, and enhance the credibility and quality of our reasoning processes, thereby ensuring our critical thinking aligns with ethical and logical standards.

The lecture's emphasis on the ethical basis of arguments resonates with my belief that ethics are integral to sound reasoning. A well-constructed argument without ethical underpinnings risks being manipulative or unjust, especially when influencing others' decisions. Ethics serve as a guiding framework that ensures our reasoning respects the dignity of all stakeholders and aligns with moral principles like honesty, fairness, and responsibility. For example, in persuasive communication, ethical considerations prevent the use of fallacies, emotional appeals, or misleading information—elements that compromise the argument's integrity. Therefore, I agree that ethics are fundamental to effective arguments because they uphold credibility, promote trust, and foster socially responsible decision-making.

Reflecting on my educational journey, I recognize that learning to think critically is a perpetual endeavor. While I have gained valuable tools and insights over these eight weeks, I acknowledge the complexity and ever-evolving nature of critical thinking skills. In real-world scenarios, new challenges, information, and perspectives continually emerge, requiring ongoing reflection and adaptation. Critical thinking is not a static achievement but a lifelong process of honing reasoning abilities, questioning assumptions, and integrating new knowledge within an ethical framework. Consequently, I believe that developing critical thinking is a continuous pursuit, vital for personal growth and informed citizenship.

References

• Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
• Ennis, R. H. (2011). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. In S. Norris (Ed.), Teaching critical thinking: Practical wisdom (pp. 11-23). Routledge.
• Norris, S. (2016). Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 64(2), 41–48.
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
• Lipman, M. (2017). Critical thinking: Origins, instructions, and implications. Educational Leadership, 74(7), 52-58.
• Facione, P. A., & Facione, N. C. (2018). Critical thinking and clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(2), 97–101.
• Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2003). Defining critical thinking. The Critical Thinking Community.
• Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Routledge.
• Trowbridge, L. & Nelson, S. (2016). Critical Thinking: The many ways to define it. In J. E. Bransford et al. (Eds.), How People Learn II. National Academies Press.
• Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students develop independent thinking and reasoned judgment. Jossey-Bass.