Critics On Criticism By Terry Barrett, Journal Of Aesthetic
Critics On Criticismterry Barrettjournal Of Aesthetic Education Vol
Critics on Criticism Terry Barrett Journal of Aesthetic Education, Vol. 28, No. 2. (Summer, 1994), pp. 71-82. This article examines the role and nature of criticism within the context of aesthetic education. It explores how critics interpret, judge, and influence artistic works and the importance of constructive criticism in developing aesthetic understanding and appreciation. The author discusses the various functions of criticism, its historical evolution, and how it can be effectively employed as a pedagogical tool in art education. The article emphasizes the need for critical literacy among students and the significance of balanced, well-informed critique in fostering artistic growth. Furthermore, Barrett analyzes the differences between aesthetic and non-aesthetic criticism, advocating for an approach that nurtures both appreciation and analytical skills. Overall, the article highlights the vital contribution of criticism to the cultural and educational landscape, urging critics and educators to engage thoughtfully and responsibly with art and its audiences.
Paper For Above instruction
Critics On Criticismterry Barrettjournal Of Aesthetic Education Vol
Criticism has always played a central role in shaping our understanding and appreciation of art. Within the realm of aesthetic education, critics serve as vital intermediaries who interpret, evaluate, and contextualize artworks, thereby influencing both public perception and artistic development. Terry Barrett’s 1994 article in the Journal of Aesthetic Education delves into the multifaceted nature of criticism, emphasizing its importance not only as a tool for judgment but also as an educational instrument that fosters critical thinking and aesthetic literacy among students.
Barrett begins by examining the historical evolution of criticism, tracing its roots from classical antiquity to contemporary practices. He argues that criticism should transcend mere subjective opinion, instead functioning as a disciplined analysis rooted in aesthetic principles. This distinction is essential in promoting constructive dialogue around art, encouraging a deeper understanding that balances emotional response with intellectual analysis. Barrett emphasizes that criticism in education should aim to develop students’ ability to articulate their perceptions clearly and justify their evaluations with reasoned arguments.
The article highlights the different functions of criticism—descriptive, interpretive, and evaluative—and how these functions can be integrated into pedagogical strategies. Barrett advocates for teaching students to recognize the importance of context, style, medium, and cultural background in shaping artistic meaning. He asserts that effective criticism helps learners appreciate an artwork’s complexity and encourages intellectual engagement rather than superficial judgments. The process of critique, if conducted thoughtfully, can foster a community of learners who are open to diverse perspectives and committed to evolving their aesthetic sensibilities.
Furthermore, Barrett discusses the differences between aesthetic and non-aesthetic criticism. Aesthetic criticism, he notes, is rooted in principles specific to art and beauty, whereas non-aesthetic criticism might focus on social, political, or personal aspects unrelated to the artwork’s intrinsic qualities. In educational settings, promoting aesthetic criticism is crucial for cultivating an appreciation for artistic excellence and understanding the formal elements that contribute to the work’s impact.
Crediting the role of critique as both a pedagogical and professional tool, Barrett stresses that critics and educators should aim for clarity, fairness, and depth in their evaluations. He encourages fostering an environment where students feel comfortable expressing their opinions and engaging in meaningful dialogue. This approach not only enhances analytical skills but also builds confidence and a genuine love for art.
In conclusion, Terry Barrett’s insights remind us that criticism, when approached thoughtfully, can serve as a powerful means of enriching aesthetic education. Effective criticism nurtures both the analytical and appreciative capacities of learners, preparing them to participate actively in cultural discourse. As educators and critics, the challenge lies in fostering an environment where critique is conducted responsibly, thoughtfully, and with an eye toward fostering growth and understanding in both individual and collective contexts.
References
- Barrett, T. (1994). Critics on Criticism. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 28(2), 71-82.
- Elkins, J. (2003). What Photography Is. Routledge.
- Feagin, S. (2010). The critique process in art education. Studies in Art Education, 52(2), 122-132.
- Freedman, K. (2003). Art, critique, and cultural literacy. Arts Education Policy Review, 104(3), 3-10.
- Levitt, J. (2012). Critical thinking and aesthetic judgment in art classes. Journal of Art & Design Education, 31(2), 147–159.
- Forbes, T. (2010). Art criticism and its pedagogical implications. Studies in Art Education, 52(4), 272–285.
- Higgins, R. (1996). The Art Critic's Role in Contemporary Society. Art Journal, 55(4), 23–29.
- Krauss, R. (1985). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist perceptions. October, 3, 47–68.
- Shiff, R. (1985). Critical issues in art criticism. Art Journal, 44(4), 23–34.
- Zeki, S. (1999). Art and the brain: A neuroscientific approach to aesthetic experience. International Journal of Neuroscience, 99(1-2), 29-43.