CRMJ 2020 American Legal Systems Fall 2022 Topics For The Fa

CRMJ 2020 American Legal Systems Fall 2022topics For The First React

Crmj 2020 American Legal Systems – Fall 2022 TOPICS FOR THE FIRST REACTION PAPER The first reaction paper is due on Dropbox by 11:59 PM on October 2, 2022. Please write a reaction/response paper to one (only one) of the two questions below. Formatting/general nature of the paper: · Word document 4–5 pages long. This excludes abstract, title page, reference page etc. The body of the paper therefore will have at least 1,000 words , preferably more. · At the top of the first page, indicate your name and which question you are responding to · Double-spaced Times New Roman 12-point font with standard margins · Pages numbered · Use Word format · This requires research beyond the course materials. You must read the entirety of the opinions you reference and look up publications/articles commenting on the cases. · Use APA citation style. Look up APA citation style. A slide is also attached. Points will be DOCKED for failure to adhere to this requirement. The minimum page length count is exclusive of the references page Question 1: Both United States v. Nixon , 418 U.S. ) and Massachusetts v. Laird , 400 U.S. ) concerned the Political Question Doctrine. [This is defined on p. 393, and discussed on pp 130-2 of the class text 8th. Ed.] Central to both cases was whether the actions at issue were within the discretion of the other co-equal branches and therefore not properly subject to judicial intervention and resolution by the Courts. Imagine that you were a SCOTUS justice in either of the cases. Would you have voted with the majority or would you have dissented? Justify your vote. When providing reasons to justify your vote, feel free to draw upon (a) how binding you think this decision is now (b) considerations regarding the purposes, policies, and/or principles behind the political question doctrine under our constitutional system and (c) how clear you find this doctrine to be in the abstract, and how consistent has the court been in its application. The paper should: (1) start by stating clearly whether you would have voted with the majority or whether you would have dissented; (2) then offer arguments justifying your vote in an organized way. Question 2: According to Black’s Law Dictionary, jury nullification is “[a] jury’s knowing and deliberate rejection of the evidence or refusal to apply the law either because the jury wants to send a message about some social issue that is larger than the case itself or because the result dictated by law is contrary to the jury’s sense of justice, morality, or fairness.†For the purposes of this response paper, assume that jury nullification can happen only in a criminal proceeding when a jury returns a verdict of “not guilty.†(Of course, a jury can acquit a criminal defendant even when it does not nullify – when it is not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt, on the basis of the law and the evidence, that the defendant is guilty.

But if a jury nullifies, then it does so only by acquitting a criminal defendant.) Does the possibility of jury nullification make the American criminal legal system better or worse (all things of relevance to justice, societal well-being, and the rule of law considered)? The paper should: (1) start by taking a clear position on whether, all things considered, allowing for jury nullification makes the American criminal legal system, overall, better or worse; (2) then offer arguments in favor of that position in an organized way; and (3) then respond to at least one (you may respond to more than one) of the strongest arguments against that position. Impact of Veganism In the article " The 14 things you need to know before you go vegan†(2019), Sirin Kale argues veganism has environmental, health, and ethical benefits.

Sirin uses various expert advice like Katy Beskow, an author of three bestselling cookbooks and a long-time vegan, Henry Firth, and Isa Chandra Moskowitz, author, and columnist, among other experts, to show how one can go by to be vegan and why it's the right thing to do. The author's purpose is to point out the advantages of going began, its benefits, and how to transition from a meat eater to a total Vegan. Due to the informative nature of the article, it seems to be directed to the general public and those interested in going vegan. In the journal “Effects of Vegetarian Diets on Blood Lipids: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" (2015), Wang F., Zheng J., Yang B., Jiang J., Fu Y., and Li D. argue that there is evidence to support the claim that vegetarian diets effectively reduce blood levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

They used systematic review and meta-analysis to support their claim. Through March 2015, they searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library for papers that discussed how vegetarian diets affected blood lipids. The purpose of this journal was to prove that vegan diets are effective at lowering the concentration of blood lipids and how they can be used as non-pharmaceutical means of handling dyslipidemia, specifically hypercholesterolemia. With the technical language used in the journal, the authors are writing to a well-educated audience with some knowledge of biology and nutrition. In the article "8 Vegan Diet Dangers (& How to avoid them)†(2022), Carrie Forrest highlights the hazards and health risks that a plant-based diet may bring about and how to counter these effects.

Carrie uses her experience and scientific studies data to prove how a vegan diet can lead to deficiencies of vitamins, minerals, and other essential nutrients and increase some nutrients that lead to potential health dangers. The author's purpose is to refute the fallacy that a vegan diet is the healthiest and most suitable for everyone and to offer a solution to some of the risks of going completely vegan. Because of the informative nature of her essay, it seems to be directed to an audience with little to no knowledge of the adverse side effects of going completely vegan. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: 1. What is the impact of veganism on natural and environment?

2. How is long-term health impacted by a vegan diet? References Forrest, C. (2022). Potential Risks of Vegan Diet . Clean Eating Kitchen. Retrieved 21 September 2022, from health/. Kale, S. (2019). The 14 things you need to know before you go vegan . The Guardian. Retrieved 21 September 2022, from https:/ / to-know-before-you-go-vegan. Wang, F., Zheng, J., Yang, B., Jiang, J., Fu, Y., & Li, D. (2015). Effects of Vegetarian Diets on Blood Lipids: A Systematic Review and Metaâ€Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of the American Heart Association , 4 (10). A2: Research Log 2: Expanding the Conversation 5% of Total Course Grade | Unit 2: Academic Inquiry and Research Due: October 2 at 11:59pm via Canvas Background: The Research Logs are both a tool for researchers to track and synthesize research, as well as an important part of the inquiry and research process. Each Research Log will follow the conversation model, which reflects the natural inquiry and research process that most professional and academic researchers follow: â— Log 1: Listening to the Conversation â— Log 2: Expanding the Conversation Log 2 Purpose: The purpose of Research Log 2 is to start asking new questions about your focused, specific issue you settled on after the first Research Log.

During this phase of the research process, you will seek multiple perspectives to try to understand a variety of perspectives, learn what has and has not worked in the past to solve the problem, or what complicates the answers to your inquiry question. â— Your end goal will be to discover the perspectives of a variety of stakeholders through the many questions you will ask. By the end of Log 2 you should feel you’ve heard from many different and sometimes opposing points of view and have worked to understand those perspectives Audience: Your primary audience will be your CO150 peers and yourself. I will be your secondary audience. Genre: The Research Portfolio is an academic tool and will therefore include specific academic expectations for research, including MLA citations, synthesis, and summary.

Requirements: Sources for Research Log 2 should help you understand the opinions, concerns, or beliefs of the various people and groups involved in your focused, specific issue. Therefore, some purely informative articles may not work well for this assignment. Hold on to those informative sources, however, as they may be helpful later. For this second log, you will need to have at least two scholarly sources. Submit one document that includes the following: â— Citation: An MLA citation of the source â— Rhetorical Précis: This is a specific, 4-sentence summary of your source.

Please see instructions on Canvas for how to do this. â— Repeat for each of your three sources When you are finished with all three citations and their rhetorical précis, complete the Source Discussion at the end of the document, including: â— A word discussion, with use of author tags, of your findings thus far. Include the following in your writing: o What stakeholder perspectives have you learned about so far? What stake do these people/groups have in this issue? Who is missing from the conversation? o Where do you see overlap in opinions/concerns/values between these stakeholders? In other words, what common ground do you see among the perspectives you've gathered?

Do you share any common ground with these people? o Where do the perspectives differ? In other words, what differences are there between opinions/concerns, or what the groups have at stake with this issue? How do you differ in perspective from these groups? o What questions do you have about any of the stakeholders’ points of view? What would you like to learn more about from these groups? Include the CSU Honor Pledge at the end of the document: “I have not given, received, or used any unauthorized assistance on my writing project.â€