Cross Network Diagram Copyright Rasmussen Inc 2013 Proprieta

Crss Network Diagramcopyright Rasmussen Inc 2013 Proprietary And Co

Crss Network Diagramcopyright Rasmussen Inc 2013 Proprietary And Co

Provide a comprehensive analysis of the security vulnerabilities and mitigation strategies detailed in the provided FedRAMP Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) table for the CRSS network system. Your discussion should examine each weakness listed, evaluate the effectiveness of current controls, and suggest potential improvements based on current cybersecurity best practices. Focus on the significance of each vulnerability within the context of federal information security standards, and assess how the implemented remedial actions align with NIST guidelines and federal compliance requirements. Additionally, consider the broader implications for organizational security posture and risk management.

Paper For Above instruction

The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by federal agencies. The POA&M form is a critical component in documenting and managing system vulnerabilities, tracking remediation efforts, and ensuring compliance with cybersecurity standards such as those outlined by NIST. Analyzing the provided POA&M table of the CRSS network reveals a range of vulnerabilities, their associated risks, and the control measures undertaken to mitigate them. This comprehensive evaluation aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the current security posture, propose enhancements, and reinforce the organization’s adherence to federal cybersecurity mandates.

1. Authentication Weaknesses and Controls

The first vulnerability (V-001), concerning the reliance on single-factor authentication, underscores the importance of multi-factor authentication (MFA) in safeguarding access to domain assets. Although the organization has implemented a two-factor authentication system utilizing RSA tokens, prior to this, password-only access left the system vulnerable to credential theft and brute-force attacks. The transition to RSA tokens significantly enhances security, aligning with NIST Special Publication 800-63B guidelines on digital identity verification (NIST, 2017). However, the success of this measure depends on comprehensive user enrollment, secure token issuance, and ongoing management.

The subsequent weakness (V-003), involving the absence of authentication management, was addressed through establishing a web portal for password changes and procedures for device decommissioning. These controls are crucial for maintaining password integrity and limiting authorized access. NIST recommends that organizations implement robust identity and access management practices, including periodic review of authentication methods and revocation procedures (NIST, 2018). The deployment of a dedicated portal for password resets is consistent with these standards, though regular audits and multi-factor authentication for the portal itself could further bolster security.

2. Physical and Network Access Controls

V-002 highlights physical and network vulnerabilities where rogue devices could potentially access the network via physical access or compromised Wi-Fi credentials. The organization mitigates this by ensuring physical security through guards and physical access controls, as well as controlling Wi-Fi access via domain authentication complemented by two-factor authentication. Such layered security aligns with NIST SP 800-53 AC-1 and AC-17 controls, emphasizing the importance of physical and logical access restrictions (NIST, 2020). Nonetheless, ongoing network monitoring, port security, and network intrusion detection systems could further reduce risk of unauthorized device access.

3. Privileged Access Management

V-004 addresses the risk associated with domain administrator accounts that have extensive privileges. The organization has created specialized security groups, implemented account logging, and secured administrator passwords, which is a positive step toward limiting access and ensuring accountability. According to NIST SP 800-53 AC-2 and AC-6, organizations should enforce the principle of least privilege and regularly review access rights. Additional measures such as multi-factor authentication for administrator accounts, privileged session management, and continuous monitoring can further mitigate risk (NIST, 2020).

4. Legacy and Environmental Risks

V-005 discusses the physical fire suppression system utilizing Halon 1301, an ozone-depleting substance. The organization's decision to accept the risk associated with continuing to use Halon, based on its effectiveness and safety profile, acknowledges the trade-offs often present in environmental and safety considerations. NIST and EPA guidelines recommend transitioning to environmentally safe alternatives, such as FM-200 or inert gas systems, to future-proof compliance and environmental responsibility (EPA, 2022). While maintaining the existing system temporarily is reasonable, planning for replacement aligns with sustainable practices and regulatory expectations.

5. Vulnerability Management and Scanning

V-006 highlights the deficiency in performing strong vulnerability scans, especially credentialed scans, which are vital for accurate identification of system weaknesses. Moving the Nessus server to a secured network segment and limiting access are good security practices, but regular, credentialed vulnerability scans are necessary for comprehensive risk assessment per NIST SP 800-40 (NIST, 2018). Using Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions like Splunk further enhances threat detection and incident response. Periodic, automated scans should be added to establish ongoing vulnerability management and mitigate emerging threats.

6. Overall Risk and Remediation Effectiveness

The combination of controls and remediation measures demonstrates a commitment to safeguarding the CRSS network, but gaps remain in areas such as privileged access, vulnerability management, environmental safety, and continuous monitoring. To align more closely with federal standards, the organization should adopt a holistic risk management approach, integrating continuous monitoring, periodic audits, user awareness training, and automated alerting systems.

Furthermore, adherence to NIST's Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF) can reinforce the security posture through its core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. Continuous improvement based on assessment results, incident trends, and evolving threats is essential for resilience. Ensuring documentation, training, and executive oversight completes the security lifecycle, enabling the organization to respond effectively to both internal and external security challenges.

In conclusion, the CRSS network's current security measures reflect awareness of key vulnerabilities and a proactive approach to mitigation. However, adopting advanced, layered controls, conducting regular reviews, and embracing emerging best practices such as zero-trust architecture can substantially enhance the security posture. Federal agencies and organizations are encouraged to embed these principles into their cybersecurity strategies to ensure compliance, resilience, and protection of critical information assets.

References

  • NIST. (2017). Digital Identity Guidelines (SP 800-63B). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • NIST. (2018). Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments (SP 800-30 Revision 1). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • NIST. (2020). Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations (SP 800-53 Revision 5). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • NIST. (2018). Small Business Cybersecurity Corner: Vulnerability Scanning. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • EPA. (2022). Phaseout of Ozone-Depleting Substances. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • FISMA. (2014). Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) Implementation Guidelines. U.S. Government Publishing Office.
  • ISO/IEC 27001. (2013). Information Security Management Systems – Requirements.
  • Criss, J. (2019). Effective Vulnerability Management Strategies. Journal of Cybersecurity Best Practices.
  • Smith, A., & Jones, P. (2020). Environmental Safety in Data Centers: Transitioning from Halon. International Journal of Data Center Management.
  • Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). (2021). Building an Effective Vulnerability Management Program.

Related Assignments