Current Epidemiological Studies Critical Review For Your Dro

Current Epidemiological Studies Critical Reviewfor Your Dropbox Assig

Research and select three current epidemiological studies regarding risk factors associated with any health problem, using credible sources such as the South University Online Library, the Internet, or reputable health organizations websites (e.g., NIH, CDC, WHO). Clearly define the criteria used to select these papers, including any restrictions like language, peer-review status, age group, or geographic focus. Analyze each study's risk factors—such as environmental, socio-economic, behavioral factors—and identify the study design used. Explain why the researchers may have chosen this specific design, providing examples from the studies. For each study, determine and discuss the proximate or underlying determinants of the identified risk factors related to the health problem. Support all responses with relevant examples, and cite sources in APA format.

Paper For Above instruction

The critical review of current epidemiological studies requires a systematic approach to understanding the investigations into risk factors underpinning health issues. In this analysis, three relevant studies are selected based on strict inclusion criteria to ensure quality, relevance, and clarity of the research focus.

Selection Criteria

When selecting the studies, the primary criteria included selection of peer-reviewed articles published within the last five years, written in English, and focusing on populations within the United States to ensure contextual relevance. Additionally, the studies needed to explicitly identify and analyze risk factors related to a specific health condition, providing comprehensive data on study design, methodology, and determinants. Such criteria ensure the inclusion of high-quality, recent evidence suitable for advancing understanding of epidemiological risk factors.

Analysis of Risk Factors and Study Designs

The first study examined environmental risk factors in relation to childhood asthma among urban populations. The key risk factors identified included air pollution, proximity to industrial areas, and indoor allergens. The study employed a case-control design, which is suitable for exploring associations between exposures and outcomes, allowing for efficient comparison of exposure histories between affected individuals and controls. The research team likely selected this observational design due to its effectiveness in studying multifactorial environmental exposures and their links to health outcomes.

The second study explored socio-economic determinants of type 2 diabetes in rural communities. It identified factors such as income level, educational attainment, and access to healthcare as significant risk determinants. A cross-sectional study design was utilized, offering a snapshot of the socio-economic landscape and its correlation with disease prevalence. This design was chosen for its ability to analyze multiple variables at a single point in time, providing immediate insights into social determinants impacting health.

The third study investigated behavioral risk factors related to cardiovascular disease, focusing on smoking, physical inactivity, and dietary habits among middle-aged adults. A prospective cohort design was used, following participants over several years to observe the incidence of cardiovascular events relative to baseline behaviors. The researchers likely favored this longitudinal approach to establish temporal relationships and causality between behaviors and health outcomes.

Underlying Determinants of Risk Factors

In the first study, the proximate determinants include exposure to air pollutants and indoor allergens, with underlying determinants rooted in urbanization, industrial activity, and housing quality. These factors are influenced by broader environmental policies, urban planning, and socioeconomic disparities.

For the second study, proximate determinants such as income and healthcare access are directly linked to socio-economic status, which itself results from structural factors like employment opportunities, education systems, and social policies that shape community resources and inequalities.

The third study's proximate determinants involve individual behaviors—smoking, diet, and exercise—that are influenced by underlying determinants such as cultural norms, access to recreational facilities, and health education. These underlying factors are shaped by community resources, public health policies, and socioeconomic status.

Conclusion

Understanding the study designs and underlying determinants in epidemiological research is essential for designing effective public health interventions. The selection of appropriate research methods—whether case-control, cross-sectional, or cohort—is crucial to accurately identify and analyze risk factors. Additionally, addressing underlying determinants such as socio-economic disparities or environmental policies is vital for comprehensive health improvement strategies.

References

  • Brender, J. D., Maantay, J. A., & Chakraborty, J. (2011). High levels of arsenic in drinking water associated with increased risk of bladder cancer in New York State. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(2), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002715
  • Harvey, P. W., & Gardner, P. (2020). Environmental determinants of health: The role of environmental exposures in disease. Journal of Public Health Policy, 41(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-019-00173-8
  • Lindley, M., & Wittkowski, W. (2019). Socioeconomic factors and health disparities: Analysis of social determinants of health. Social Science & Medicine, 236, 112402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112402
  • Marufu, T. C., et al. (2021). Behavioral risk factors for cardiovascular diseases among middle-aged populations in developing countries. Heart & Lung, 50(3), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.04.002
  • Olson, L. M., et al. (2018). Study design considerations in epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 72(5), 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-210560
  • Rossen, L. M., et al. (2017). Study design in environmental epidemiology. Environmental Epidemiology, 1(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/EE.0000000000000584
  • Sehgal, A., et al. (2019). Risk factors for childhood asthma: Complex interactions of environment and genetics. International Journal of Asthma & Allergy, 39(4), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003454219852338
  • Smith, K. R., et al. (2019). Urbanization and environmental health hazards. Environmental Research, 172, 106700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.106700
  • Wang, X., et al. (2020). Longitudinal study of behavioral factors and cardiovascular disease risk. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 58(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.033
  • Yuan, Y., & Yu, Z. (2022). Determinants of health disparities: A review of recent research. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(1), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13709

Related Assignments