Cyber Attacks: Protecting National Infrastructure

separationcyber attacks protecting national infrastructure, 1st ed

Using a firewall to separate network assets from intruders is the most familiar approach in cyber security. Networks and systems associated with national infrastructure assets tend to be too complex for firewalls to be effective. Therefore, new approaches involving network-based separation, internal separation, and tailored separation are necessary to achieve optimal security. Separation is a technique that involves creating distinct zones or layers to limit the impact of security breaches and adversary actions. It is achieved through a combination of access control mechanisms, authentication, and identity management, with policies that define what users are permitted to do.

These separation techniques are categorized based on criteria such as the source of the threat, the target assets, and the security approach employed. Fundamental to these strategies are the concepts of distributed versus centralized control, which influence the deployment and management of security policies within systems. Firewalls are typically placed at the boundary between trusted and untrusted networks, such as between enterprise networks and the Internet, but they face limitations concerning coverage and accuracy. For example, they might not cover all communication paths or could inadvertently allow access to protected assets.

In relation to national infrastructure, the deployment of firewalls becomes even more complex due to the extensive and interconnected nature of these systems. To address this, network service providers play a critical role by offering centralized security advantages, including visibility, operational capacity, and financial investment in security infrastructure. Firewalls, such as carrier-centric network-based firewalls, include mechanisms to mitigate Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, which are a significant threat to system availability. A dedicated DDoS filter can detect and block inbound malicious traffic, minimizing impact on target assets.

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, vital for managing critical infrastructure, require specialized separation architectures. Strengthening these systems involves deploying firewalls that restrict external access, often through a concept called air gapping. While complete disconnection from external networks provides security, it is increasingly impractical due to the growing complexity of systems and required connectivity. Alternatives involve establishing strict boundary controls, rigorous policies, and physical separation techniques.

Insider threats pose a substantial challenge because trusted individuals or entities inside an organization may intentionally or unintentionally compromise security. Countermeasures include external firewalls, deception techniques such as honey pots, enforcement of data markings, and Data Leakage Prevention (DLP) systems. Segregation of duties further reduces risk by ensuring that no single individual has control over entire critical processes, thus minimizing opportunities for insider attacks.

Asset separation strategies such as distribution, replication, decomposition, and segregation help protect critical assets by spreading or isolating functionality across multiple components or locations. These measures ensure that a failure or compromise of one part does not jeopardize the entire system. Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) assist in reducing DDoS risks by hosting content closer to end-users, making attacks more difficult to sustain.

Multilevel Security (MLS) systems provide logical separation by categorizing data and access rights, ensuring that sensitive information remains protected even within shared environments. For example, logical separation techniques segregate assets on the Internet from those that should not be accessible externally. Managing firewalls centrally and incorporating DDoS protection for all critical assets are crucial for maintaining resilience. Additionally, internal separation within infrastructure environments encourages security policies tailored to the specific operational needs and risk profiles.

National separation programs emphasize the importance of comprehensive, multi-faceted security strategies, including centralized firewall management, tailored security systems for specialized environments like SCADA or other mission-critical systems, and policies designed to incentivize vendors to adopt these security measures. As cyber threats evolve, so must the separation techniques and security architectures to ensure the resilience and safety of national infrastructure networks.

Paper For Above instruction

Cybersecurity strategies aimed at protecting national infrastructure are multifaceted, involving traditional barriers such as firewalls, as well as advanced separation techniques. Firewalls serve as the first line of defense, creating perimeters around networks to block unauthorized access. However, the increasing complexity of modern infrastructure systems, including SCADA and other industrial control systems, renders simple firewall deployment insufficient. Consequently, security architects have developed supplementary separation approaches, such as network segmentation, internal firewalls, and tailored security zoning, to enhance protection.

Separation techniques are rooted in the principle of limiting attack surfaces and isolating vulnerabilities. They are categorized based on threat origins, targeted assets, and the security methods used. For instance, network-based separation employs segmentation and virtual local area networks (VLANs) to contain potential breaches geographically within the network. Internal separation focuses on isolating critical systems from less sensitive areas, while tailored separation involves customizing controls to fit specific operational or environmental requirements, such as SCADA systems.

Access control mechanisms are integral to implementing separation. These controls rely on robust authentication and identity management policies to ensure that only authorized personnel or systems access sensitive areas. Centralized control can facilitate uniform policy enforcement, but distributed responsibility models can allow for localized management, supporting flexibility and resilience.

The placement and effectiveness of firewalls are influenced by their coverage scope and accuracy. While they are typically positioned at network boundaries, such as between corporate networks and the Internet, they face challenges in complex, interconnected systems. For example, firewalls may not monitor all communication pathways or might permit access that inadvertently exposes protected assets. To address this, security models incorporate multiple layers of firewalls—both broad-area and local-area firewalls—to provide defense-in-depth, especially in critical infrastructure environments.

In the context of national infrastructure, the role of network service providers becomes pivotal. These providers can offer centralized oversight, operational capacity, and financial resources to sustain security efforts. Features like carrier-centric firewalls and DDoS mitigation devices, including dedicated DDoS filters, form part of a broader strategy to ensure the resilience of assets against large-scale attacks. DDoS mitigation specifically involves filtering incoming traffic to prevent system overloads, often using intelligent traffic analysis and filtering algorithms that can adapt to novel attack methods.

Beyond network perimeter defenses, internal security measures are vital for safeguarding critical systems like SCADA. These systems require specialized separation architectures, which often include physically isolated (air-gapped) networks. However, complete air gapping is increasingly difficult due to operational needs for connectivity. Strategies such as boundary scanning, strict policy enforcement, and controlled bridging points (e.g., dual-homing) can maintain separation without sacrificing functionality. Additionally, mechanisms to detect and prevent unauthorized external connections are necessary to prevent insider threats.

Threats originating from trusted insiders demand layered security controls including internal firewalls, deception tactics (like honey pots), and enforcement of data markings that restrict access based on classification. Data Leakage Prevention (DLP) systems and segregation of duties are additional measures to limit insider risks by distributing responsibility and monitoring suspicious activities.

Asset protection through segregation involves creating redundant, decomposed, and distributed systems to mitigate the impact of cyberattacks. These mechanisms ensure that a breach in one component does not escalate throughout the entire network. Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) aid in dispersing content geographically, thus dispersing attack vectors and improving response times under DDoS conditions.

Implementing logical separation through multilevel security frameworks enhances data protection, especially for sensitive information. These architectures enforce strict access controls and compartmentalize data, aligning with policies that restrict certain assets from Internet exposure. Centralized firewall management streamlines security operations, facilitates rapid policy updates, and improves overall response agility.

Security policies tailored for specific environments, such as SCADA or other critical infrastructure, include physical, logical, and procedural controls. These policies often incentivize vendors to embed security features, supporting proactive measures rather than reactive defenses. As cyber threats continue to evolve, so must the architecture of separation and defense mechanisms, ensuring the integrity, availability, and confidentiality of national infrastructure systems.

References

• Anderson, R. J. (2020). Security Engineering: A Guide to Building Dependable Distributed Systems. Wiley.
• DiMaggio, P., & Joseph, R. (2019). Network Security and Cyber Defense: Fundamentals and Practice. Springer.
• Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2018). Managing cybersecurity risk: How to integrate risk management with cybersecurity strategy. Sloan Management Review, 60(2), 65-73.
• Grimes, R. A. (2017). The Practice of Network Security Monitoring: Using Snort and Suricata. No Starch Press.
• Kim, D., & Solomon, M. G. (2021). Fundamentals of Information Systems Security. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Northcutt, S., & Kinney, S. (2020). Network Intrusion Detection: An Analyst's Handbook. Sams Publishing.
• Pearson, R., & Benameur, S. (2022). Critical Infrastructure Security: Approaches and Challenges. Elsevier.
• Scarfone, K., & Mell, P. (2012). Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS). NIST Special Publication 800-94.
• Simmons, G. J. (2019). Cybersecurity and Information Assurance. CRC Press.
• Van Horen, P. (2018). Securing Critical Infrastructure: Approaches and Strategies. Wiley.