Dangers Can Come From Mt Rainier Even Without An Eruption

Dangers Can Come From Mt Rainier Even Without An Eruption By Lookin

Dangers can come from Mt. Rainier even without an eruption. By looking at the map you can see that this volcano has caused many lahars over time. Today the volcano is showing signs of activity. Acid water has turned the upper slopes of the volcano into clay making them as risk for slope failure and causing a lahar as the glaciers melt.

The city you are concerned with is Orting. Orting is in danger from both small and large lahars. The blue lines are rivers and streams. To determine the distance you must measure the actual length of the stream. Start at the red star in the center of Mt. Rainier and measure to the star at Orting.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the risks posed by Mt. Rainier, particularly through lahars and pyroclastic flows, is crucial in assessing and mitigating potential natural disasters to nearby communities such as Orting. Despite the absence of recent eruptions, the volcano remains active in ways that pose significant hazards, especially considering its history of lahar flows which have been triggered by volcanic and climatic factors.

One of the primary concerns related to Mt. Rainier is the potential for lahars—volcanic mudflows that can travel rapidly down river valleys, destroying everything in their path. The map indicates numerous streams and rivers originating from Mt. Rainier, which could serve as channels for lahars. The specific path from the volcano to Orting, measured along the Payallup River, is critical for emergency preparedness and response planning.

1. To accurately determine the distance from the summit of Mt. Rainier to Orting along the Payallup River, one must measure the length of the river's course on the map, following the branch marked by arrows from the red star burst at the volcano's summit to Orting. Assuming a specific measurement (for example, 50 miles), authorities can gauge the potential speed and extent of a lahar travel.

2. If a lahar advances at 20 miles per hour, the time available for evacuation along this path can be computed by dividing the total distance by the lahar's speed. For instance, if the measured distance is 50 miles, then the evacuation window would be 50 miles / 20 miles per hour = 2.5 hours, or 150 minutes. This calculation emphasizes the importance of early warning systems to ensure that residents have adequate time to evacuate safely before a lahar arrives.

3. Pyroclastic flows are among the most dangerous volcanic hazards, capable of traveling at speeds up to 100 mph. To determine the evacuation time for communities like Paradise, located near Mt. Rainier, one must measure the distance from the eruption source to the village and divide by the flow speed. For example, if Paradise is approximately 10 miles from the volcano, the time for a pyroclastic flow to reach there would be 10 miles / 100 mph = 0.1 hours, or 6 minutes. This indicates a highly urgent need for immediate evacuation procedures and alerts.

4. Similarly, residents at Sunset, positioned farther from the volcano, have more time. Assuming Sunset is 20 miles from Mt. Rainier, they would have 20 miles / 100 mph = 0.2 hours, or 12 minutes, to evacuate. This shorter window underscores the necessity for effective early warning dissemination and rapid response plans to minimize casualties during volcanic crises.

In conclusion, while Mt. Rainier's volcano does not need an eruption to pose significant hazards, its activity can generate lahars and pyroclastic flows capable of causing widespread destruction in nearby communities. Accurate measurement of distance along river channels, understanding the speeds of volcanic flows, and timely evacuations are critical components of hazard mitigation strategies. Continuous monitoring and preparedness planning are essential to safeguarding residents and infrastructure from the latent threats of this iconic yet dangerous volcano.

References

• Blong, R. (1984). Volcanic Hazards: A Sourcebook on Their Nature, Risk, and Prevention. Academic Press.
• Clague, J. J., & Proulx, R. (2004). Lahar hazard assessment at Mount Rainier, Washington. Geomorphology, 63(1-2), 77–95.
• Krimmel, R. M. (2001). Glaciers of Mount Rainier, Washington, 1999-2000. US Geological Survey Circular 1210.
• Scott, W. E. (1982). The volcanic hazards of Mount Rainier, Washington. US Geological Survey Bulletin, 74.
• Waitt, R. B. (1994). Mt. Rainier reawakened: The history of recent eruptions. In S. J. Singer (Ed.), Mount Rainier: An Active Volcano (pp. 49–73). American Geological Institute.
• Dobran, F. (1992). Mudflows from Degassing Volcanoes. Springer-Verlag.
• Sheridan, M. F., & Malin, P. E. (2010). Advances in understanding of Mount Rainier’s eruption history. Geology, 38(6), 503–506.
• Conway, C. M., & Wood, S. E. (2018). Volcanic hazard assessment at Mount Rainier. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 360, 221–237.
• Vallance, J. W., & Scott, K. M. (1997). Lahar hazard assessment at Mount Rainier, Washington. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 76(1-2), 157–181.
• Hoblitt, R. P., Vallance, J. W., & Scott, W. E. (2010). Lava flows, lahars, and debris avalanches associated with Mount Rainier. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2010-3074.