Darrius Cooleyin: Which Medicare Payment Is Made Based On A ✓ Solved

Darrius Cooleyin Which Medicare Payment Is Made Based On A Predetermin

The primary focus of this assignment is to examine the different Medicare payment systems, specifically highlighting the distinctions between prospective and retrospective payment methods, and exploring the various healthcare reform initiatives under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that aim to improve healthcare quality, affordability, and access.

The prospective payment system (PPS) is a method where healthcare providers receive a fixed, predetermined amount for services based on classifications of Medicare services. This approach encourages efficiency by setting payment rates in advance, regardless of the actual costs incurred during the provision of care. This system is primarily used in inpatient hospital settings, where payments are based on predetermined rates associated with diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) (Ginsburg & Rothberg, 2017).

Conversely, retrospective payment plans involve reimbursement based on the healthcare provider's actual charges after services have been delivered. The provider treats the patient, submits an itemized bill outlining services rendered, and the insurance or Medicare agency reviews this bill to approve payment. This method can lead to varied costs and potentially less control over expenditures but offers flexibility in reimbursing hospitals and physicians for the actual services provided (Mason & Dunn, 2019).

Differences Between Prospective and Retrospective Payment Systems

The key distinction between prospective and retrospective systems lies in timing and flexibility. Prospective systems set fixed rates beforehand, incentivizing cost containment and efficiency. In contrast, retrospective systems reimburse providers based on actual service charges, which could potentially lead to higher costs due to less financial pressure to control expenses (Klein et al., 2020). The choice of system impacts provider behavior, patient access, and overall healthcare costs.

Healthcare Reform Initiatives Under the ACA

Several reform initiatives introduced by the ACA aim to transform healthcare delivery and financing. Three prominent programs include:

1. Global Payment Initiative: This model involves fixed monthly payments by beneficiaries for healthcare services based on their health risks and expected needs. It encourages preventive care and cost management by providing predictable payments for ongoing services (Davis et al., 2016).
2. Medical Home Payment Model: Healthcare providers receive additional payments when they meet specific quality and performance benchmarks. This model promotes comprehensive, patient-centered care by incentivizing primary care providers to deliver high-quality services efficiently (Stange et al., 2014).
3. Bundled Payment Initiative: A single payment covers multiple providers and services related to a specific episode of care, such as joint surgeries or chronic disease management. This promotes coordination among providers, reduces redundancy, and aligns financial incentives with patient outcomes (Veenstra et al., 2015).

Implications of Expanding Healthcare Coverage and Patient Education

A proposed expansion of healthcare coverage, such as broader Medicaid participation, aims to increase access to care for underserved populations. However, funding constraints threaten the sustainability of such efforts, and without cost-saving measures, the system may face financial strain. The expansion could improve healthcare quality by reducing disparities and promoting preventive care, but it requires careful resource management to avoid overburdening the system (Rowe & Fox, 2017).

Patient education is vital in enabling informed decision-making about healthcare options, especially concerning insurance coverage. Educating patients about the differences between private and government programs helps manage expectations and promotes appropriate utilization of services. Technology-driven delivery methods, such as mobile applications and online portals, provide accessible platforms for disseminating insurance information, conducting knowledge assessments, and enhancing health literacy (Friedman et al., 2018).

Conclusion

In summary, understanding the distinctions between prospective and retrospective Medicare payment systems is essential for analyzing healthcare financing strategies. The ACA's initiatives like the Global Payment, Medical Home, and Bundled Payment models represent efforts to improve healthcare quality, reduce costs, and enhance patient experiences. Supporting policies that expand coverage while ensuring financial sustainability, coupled with effective patient education, are critical steps toward a more equitable healthcare system.

References

• Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C. (2016). Mirror, mirror on the wall: How the performance of the U.S. health care system compares nationally and internationally. The Commonwealth Fund.
• Friedman, B., Podolsky, S. H., & Humer, R. A. (2018). Technology and health literacy: the importance of digital health education. Journal of health communication, 23(9), 739-747.
• Ginsburg, P. B., & Rothberg, M. B. (2017). Healthcare payment models: A primer on prospective and retrospective reimbursement. Healthcare Financial Management, 71(4), 56-63.
• Klein, R., Campbell, S. M., & Roland, M. (2020). The impact of payment systems on healthcare quality. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(4), 381-386.
• Mason, J., & Dunn, K. (2019). Comparing retrospective and prospective payment systems in healthcare. Journal of Health Economics, 68, 102245.
• Rowe, B., & Fox, D. (2017). Healthcare funding and policy: Challenges of expanding access. Health Policy, 121(10), 1004-1012.
• Stange, K. C., Ferrer, R. L., Miller, W. L., & Miller, P. (2014). The patient-centered medical home: a systematic review. Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 533-541.
• Veenstra, D. L., Klein, R., & Roos, J. (2015). The role of bundled payments in improving healthcare quality. The American Journal of Managed Care, 21(4), e195-e201.