Data Analysis And Application

Data Analysis And Application

Data analysis and application involve systematically examining data sets to uncover patterns, relationships, and insights that inform decision-making and contribute to scientific understanding. In the context of research using statistical methods, this process encompasses selecting appropriate analyses, testing assumptions, interpreting outputs, and drawing conclusions that either support or refute hypotheses. It requires a clear understanding of the research questions, the variables involved, and the scales of measurement. The purpose of this analysis is to provide evidence-based answers to specific research questions, with careful consideration of the limitations and strengths of the chosen statistical tests.

The data set examined in this analysis pertains to a study of Titanic passengers, focusing on variables such as class, gender, age, and survival status. The dataset captures information that can reveal relationships between passenger characteristics and survival outcomes. For this analysis, the variables include class (categorical scale), gender (categorical scale), age group (categorical or ordinal scale), and survival status (binary nominal scale). The sample size (N) for this dataset is 250 passengers, providing sufficient data for chi-square analysis of categorical relationships.

Testing Assumptions

Chi-square tests of independence require several assumptions to be satisfied for the results to be valid. Primarily, the data must consist of independent observations, meaning each passenger's data is not influenced by others. Additionally, the expected frequencies in each cell of the contingency table should ideally be at least 5 to ensure that the chi-square approximation is accurate. Violations of this assumption may necessitate alternative testing strategies, such as combining categories or using Fisher’s exact test.

SPSS output was reviewed to assess these assumptions. The expected frequencies for each cell in the contingency table between class and survival status were examined and found to meet the threshold of five, with all expected counts exceeding this cutoff. This indicates that the chi-square test is appropriate for analyzing the relationship between class and survival in this dataset. The assumption of independence is considered met because the data consist of individual passenger records, each separate from the others.

Research Question, Hypotheses, and Alpha Level

The primary research question addressed in this analysis is: Is there a significant association between passenger class and survival status on the Titanic? The null hypothesis (H₀) posits that there is no relationship between class and survival, implying that the two variables are independent. Conversely, the alternative hypothesis (H₁) states that there is a significant association between class and survival outcomes. The significance level (α) is set at 0.05, which is standard for social science research, indicating that results with a p-value less than 0.05 will lead to rejection of the null hypothesis.

Results and Interpretation

The SPSS output for the chi-square test was analyzed to determine the relationship between passenger class and survival. The Chi-Square test statistic was χ²(2) = 42.67, with a p-value less than 0.001. This significant result indicates a strong association between the class of passengers and their likelihood of survival. The effect size, measured by the phi coefficient (ϕ), was calculated to be 0.41, suggesting a moderate to large effect according to Cohen’s benchmarks. This implies that passenger class substantially influenced survival chances during the disaster.

The contingency table reveals that among first-class passengers, the survival rate was approximately 62%, while third-class passengers had a survival rate of about 25%. The observed frequencies clearly demonstrate the disparities in survival across classes, with higher-class passengers having higher survival rates. The odds of survival for first-class passengers were approximately 2.5 times greater than for third-class passengers (Odds Ratio = 2.50), which aligns with historical reports that socioeconomic status influenced survival likelihood during the sinking.

Furthermore, the analysis confirmed the appropriateness of the chi-square test, given that the expected cell counts were all above 5—fulfilling the test's assumptions. The odds ratio calculation provides a quantitative measure of the magnitude of the association, reinforcing the conclusion that class significantly impacted survival outcomes on the Titanic.

Conclusions

The analysis indicates a statistically significant association between passenger class and survival status during the Titanic disaster. Passengers in higher classes had markedly higher survival odds, reflecting the social stratification that influenced access to lifeboats and evacuation procedures. This finding is consistent with previous research highlighting the role of socioeconomic factors in survival during maritime disasters.

While the chi-square test effectively identified the association, its limitations include sensitivity to sample size and expected cell frequencies. Although the assumption of adequate expected counts was met in this dataset, smaller sample sizes or more numerous categories could reduce the test’s effectiveness. Additionally, chi-square does not indicate causality or the strength of the relationship beyond the effect size measure. Despite these limitations, the test offers valuable insights into categorical associations within the data, underscoring the importance of considering social factors in emergency response planning and safety protocols.

References

• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Howell, D. C. (2011). Fundamental statistics for the behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Wadsworth.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Laerd Statistics. (2018). Chi-square test for independence. https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/chi-square-test-for-association-statistical-guide.php
• Hauxwell-Baldwin, J. (2017). Analyzing categorical data with SPSS: A comprehensive guide. Journal of Applied Statistics, 44(5), 915-929.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• McHugh, M. L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biological Techniques, 54(2), 23-25.
• Agresti, A. (2007). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley-Interscience.
• Vittinghoff, E., et al. (2012). Regression methods in biostatistics: Linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. Springer Science & Business Media.