Data Reporting Progress On A Project Work

Following Are Data Reporting Progress On A Project Work On All Tasks

Following are data reporting progress on a project. Work on all tasks contained in the table is scheduled to be complete as of the day of the report. Budget Begun? Complete? Actual cost Earned Value Task A 3,100 Yes Yes 3,100 Task B 4,000 Yes Yes 4,500 Task C 2,500 Yes Yes 2,250 Task D 4,000 Yes No 3,500 Task E 3,500 Yes Yes 4,000 Task F 2,500 No No ) Using the 50-50 Rule, what is earned value for this project? 2) Using the 0-100 Rule, what is earned value for this project? 3) Note the discrepancy of earned value figures when using the 50-50 Rule and 0-100 Rule. Why is there a discrepancy? Which Rule should we use? Explain your rationale. 4) Using the 50-50 Rule earned value computation, what is schedule variance for the project as reported? 5) What is the schedule performance index (SPI)? 6) Using the 50-50 Rule earned value computation, what is the cost variance for the project as reported? 7) What is the cost performance index (CPI)? 8) If the total budget for this project is 50,000, use CPI to compute estimate at complete (EAC). 9) Using the earned value information garnered from the above table, provide your boss a brief status report on project progress to date. Also, provide projections for future status.

Paper For Above instruction

The project status report provides a comprehensive overview of the current progress, cost performance, and future projections based on earned value management (EVM) principles. Analyzing the data from the project tasks allows us to evaluate project health, identify issues, and plan corrective actions effectively. This paper utilizes two methods—the 50-50 rule and the 0-100 rule—to compute earned value (EV), and discusses their implications on project tracking metrics such as schedule variance (SV), schedule performance index (SPI), cost variance (CV), and cost performance index (CPI). Additionally, we project the Estimate at Complete (EAC) based on CPI, facilitating informed decision-making for stakeholders.

The project comprises six tasks: Tasks A through F, with budgets ranging from $2,500 to $4,000. The status of task completion and actual costs varies, with some tasks completed and others pending. Understanding how to accurately measure earned value and interpret discrepancies between methodologies is crucial for effective project control.

Earned Value Calculations Using Different Rules

The first step involves calculating EV using the two different rules:

1. 50-50 Rule: This approach assigns half of the task's budget as EV if the task is begun, regardless of completion percentage, while fully earned if completed. For tasks in progress, EV is computed as 50% of their budgets.

2. 0-100 Rule: This rule assigns EV as either 0% (not started), 50% (begun), or 100% (completed), depending on task status.

Applying these rules:

| Task | Budget | Status | Actual Cost | EV (50-50) | EV (0-100) |

|--------|---------|--------------|--------------|------------|------------|

| A | 3,100 | Completed | 3,100 | 1,550 | 3,100 |

| B | 4,000 | Completed | 4,500 | 2,000 | 4,000 |

| C | 2,500 | Completed | 2,250 | 1,250 | 2,500 |

| D | 4,000 | In Progress | 3,500 | 2,000 | 2,000 |

| E | 3,500 | Completed | 4,000 | 1,750 | 3,500 |

| F | 2,500 | Not Started | Not Begun | 0 | 0 |

Summing these values yields total EV under each rule:

- 50-50 EV Total: 1,550 + 2,000 + 1,250 + 2,000 + 1,750 + 0 = 8,550

- 0-100 EV Total: 3,100 + 4,000 + 2,500 + 2,000 + 3,500 + 0 = 15,100

Reason for Discrepancy

The primary distinction between the two methods lies in their treatment of tasks in progress. The 50-50 rule assigns only 50% of the task's value during progress, reflecting conservative earned value estimates, whereas the 0-100 rule either fully credits tasks as completed or assigns none, leading to more optimistic assessments. This discrepancy influences project variance and performance metrics.

Choosing an Appropriate Rule

The selection of a rule depends on project context and management preferences. The 50-50 rule offers a more cautious and realistic assessment, especially suitable for tracking ongoing work where partial progress is uncertain. Conversely, the 0-100 rule may be appropriate when tasks are clearly defined and the status is near completion. Generally, the 50-50 rule is preferable during project control phases to prevent overly optimistic progress reporting.

Schedule Variance and SPI Calculation

Using the 50-50 EV total:

- Planned Value (PV): Sum of budgets for tasks scheduled up to this point; assuming all tasks are scheduled to be completed now, PV = 3,100 + 4,000 + 2,500 + 4,000 + 3,500 + 2,500 = 19,600.

- Schedule Variance (SV): EV - PV = 8,550 - 19,600 = -11,050.

- Schedule Performance Index (SPI): EV / PV = 8,550 / 19,600 ≈ 0.4367.

An SPI less than 1 indicates the project is behind schedule.

Cost Variance and CPI Calculation

- Actual Cost (AC): Sum of actual costs for tasks in progress and completed:

AC = 3,100 + 4,500 + 2,250 + 3,500 + 4,000 = 17,350. (Task F is not begun, so its actual cost is zero.)

- Cost Variance (CV): EV - AC = 8,550 - 17,350 = -8,800.

- Cost Performance Index (CPI): EV / AC ≈ 8,550 / 17,350 ≈ 0.4927.

A CPI below 1 signals cost overruns relative to planned expenditure.

Estimate at Completion (EAC)

Using CPI to project total cost:

- EAC = Budget at Completion (BAC) / CPI, with BAC = $50,000,

- EAC = 50,000 / 0.4927 ≈ $101,400

This indicates that if current performance trends continue, the project is likely to nearly double its initial budget, signaling a cost overrun and the need for corrective actions.

Project Status and Future Projections

Currently, the project is significantly behind schedule, with an SPI of approximately 0.44, implying only 44% of the work planned has been accomplished. Cost overruns are also evident, with a CPI of under 0.5, indicating that the project is consuming twice the planned cost for the value achieved. Without corrective measures, these trends suggest continued delay and escalating costs.

Going forward, project managers should prioritize rescheduling resources, re-evaluating scope, and implementing tighter controls to improve efficiency and align progress with the schedule. Regular updates based on accurate earned value measurements, especially adopting the more conservative 50-50 rule during control phases, will aid in setting achievable targets and avoiding further overruns.

Effective stakeholder communication about these metrics ensures transparency and supports decision-making for remedial actions. Proactive management can help bring the project back on track or reassess project objectives considering the current trajectory.

References

• Burke, R. (2013). Project Management: Planning and Control Techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
• Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2010). Earned Value Project Management. Project Management Institute.
• PMI. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 7th Edition. Project Management Institute.
• Lientz, B. P., & Rea, K. P. (2011). Project Management for Modern Informations Systems. Academic Press.
• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
• Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced Project Management: A Structured Approach. Gower Publishing.
• Christensen, R. (2012). Practical Guide to Earned Value Management. PMI
• Oberliesen, D. (2015). Project Management Metrics & KPIs. Gartner Research.
• Aslan, M. (2016). Cost and Schedule Control in Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management.
• Cooke-Davies, T. (2004). The “real-world” project management: Pragmatic solutions for complex projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.