Data Structure Form Data Structure Form Complete The Form

Data Structure Formdata Structure Formcomplete The Form According To Y

Complete the form according to your instructions. For details, please refer to the sample completed form provided separately. The spaces expand as you write. Please provide detailed information about the data structure, including table name, business rules, table structure, fields, data types, null allowances, comments on constraints, and physical design considerations. Additionally, analyze and interpret the statistical data related to stock fund returns and IRS fraud probabilities, including calculations and reasoning, with references to relevant literature. Your response should include both the data structure design for a given project and a comprehensive analysis of the statistical questions posed, aimed at an academic level with proper citations.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Effective database design is crucial in organizing and managing data efficiently in various business and analytical scenarios. The process involves detailed planning of data structures, understanding business rules, and physical design considerations. Simultaneously, statistical analysis of financial and tax data can inform decision-making, fraud detection, and risk assessment. This paper discusses both the design of a data structure as per specified requirements and the analysis of complex probability problems based on financial returns and tax data, integrating theoretical concepts and real-world applications.

Part 1: Data Structure Design

The data structure design begins with understanding the core entities involved in a business context. Suppose we are developing a database for a healthcare management system involving patients and physicians. The requirements specify a one-to-many relationship, where one physician can oversee multiple patients, but each patient is associated with only one physician. This relationship is fundamental to ensuring referential integrity and supporting healthcare operations.

Business Rules: Define cardinality (one-to-many), modality (mandatory relationships), primary key selection, and considerations for denormalization. For example, the physician ID in the patient table must exist in the physician table, establishing a foreign key. De-normalization might be considered to optimize read performance logged in high-traffic applications, balancing storage costs against speed. Security requirements necessitate password protections, possibly through encrypted fields, and indexation to expedite queries involving frequently accessed fields such as physician ID or patient ID.

Table Structure:

Physical Design Considerations: With 24,000 records, index on PhysicianID is essential to optimize query performance, especially in join operations. The update rate and access frequency impact storage and security protocols. For example, sensitive data like passwords should be encrypted, and access should be controlled via role-based permissions. Response time is critical, so indexes on foreign keys and frequently queried fields are necessary to ensure fast retrievals.

Part 2: Financial Data Analysis

The second part involves statistical analysis based on data from stock funds and IRS tax returns. The large stock funds' return data reveal that nine funds had one-year returns exceeding 50%, and seven had five-year returns exceeding 300%. Additionally, five funds exceeded both criteria. Using these figures, we can calculate relevant probabilities, assuming the data are representative of the population.

Probability calculations:

- Probability of a high one-year return: P(High 1-Year) = 9/24 = 0.375

- Probability of a high five-year return: P(High 5-Year) = 7/24 ≈ 0.2917

- Probability of both high returns: P(Both) = 5/24 ≈ 0.2083

- Probability of neither: P(Neither) = 1 - [P(High 1-Year) + P(High 5-Year) - P(Both)] = 1 - (0.375 + 0.2917 - 0.2083) ≈ 0.5416

These probabilities help assess the likelihood of certain investment behaviors and can inform risk management strategies. Such calculations, performed via spreadsheet, underpin financial decision-making and portfolio management.

Tax Return Fraud Probability Estimation

Regarding IRS audits, the probability of a return being fraudulent given that it contains deductions exceeding the IRS standard is 0.20; this is P(Fraud | Deductions > Standard). Conversely, if deductions are within the standard, the probability drops to 0.02. Given that 8% of all returns have deductions exceeding the standard, the overall percentage of fraudulent returns can be estimated through Bayesian probability:

1. Let D be the event that deductions exceed standard (D=Yes), and F be the event that the return is fraudulent.
2. Use Bayes' theorem: P(F|D) = P(D|F) * P(F) / P(D)

Given P(D|F) = 1 (deductions exceeding standard are likely in fraudulent returns), and P(D) = 0.08, with P(F|D)=0.20, we can estimate P(F) as:

P(F) = P(F|D) P(D) + P(F|D') P(D')

where P(F|D') = 0.02 (non-deductions exceeding standard), and P(D')=0.92 (complement). Calculating:

P(F) = (0.20)(0.08) + (0.02)(0.92) = 0.016 + 0.0184 = 0.0344 or 3.44%

This estimate implies approximately 3.44% of all returns are fraudulent based on deduction patterns, integrating probabilities and Bayesian inference to inform IRS screening policies.

Conclusion

The integration of database design principles with statistical analysis illustrates the multifaceted approach necessary for effective business management and fraud detection. Proper data modeling ensures efficient operations, while probabilistic reasoning supports risk assessment and decision-making. This synthesis enhances organizational capacity to process large volumes of information robustly and interpret complex data relationships.

References

• Elmasri, R., & Navathe, S. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Database Systems (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Harrington, J. L. (2016). Relational Database Design Clearly Explained. Morgan Kaufmann.
• Kim, W., & Sandhu, R. (2010). Security architecture for distributed data management systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(4), 601-616.
• Murphy, K. P. (2012). Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. MIT Press.
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., Dunson, D., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis. CRC Press.
• Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer.
• U.S. Internal Revenue Service. (2006). Publication 535: Business Expenses.
• Gail, M., & Rubin, D. (1981). Estimation in the presence of missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(375), 129–139.
• Lehmann, E. L., & Casella, G. (2003). Theory of Point Estimation. Springer.