Database Relational Model Based On Connolly Textbook ✓ Solved

Database Relational Model Based on the Connolly textbook,

Discuss some relational database terminology, especially the various keys. Include an example of a primary key (other than the one in the text). Include one question for your peers to research and answer. A web search for relevant articles and information could be employed to further assist you in your response. 300 Words Minimum Please focus answer more towards various Keys, check pdf3 for various keys.

Paper For Above Instructions

The relational database model is foundational in database management, providing a structured framework for data organization and retrieval. Essential to understanding this model are keys, which play a critical role in establishing relationships among data elements. This paper discusses various types of keys and their significance in a relational database, as described in the Connolly textbook.

Primary Key

A primary key is a unique identifier for each record in a database table. It ensures that no two rows have the same value for this key, thus guaranteeing data integrity. An example of a primary key is a social security number (SSN) for records in a citizens' information database. Each individual has a unique SSN, making it an effective identifier that can prevent duplication of records.

Foreign Key

A foreign key is a column or a set of columns in one table that refers to the primary key in another table, establishing a link between the two tables. It is crucial for maintaining referential integrity within the database. For instance, in a database consisting of a 'Students' table and a 'Courses' table, the 'Courses' table may contain a foreign key that references the primary key (StudentID) of the 'Students' table. This relationship allows the database to maintain a consistent mapping between students and the courses they are enrolled in.

Candidate Key

A candidate key is a set of attributes that can uniquely identify a record in a table. It is essentially a potential primary key, and a table can have multiple candidate keys. The key chosen as the primary key is referred to as the primary candidate key, while the others remain as alternative keys. For example, in a table of employees, both EmployeeID and Email can serve as candidate keys, as each can uniquely identify an employee.

Composite Key

A composite key is a primary key that consists of two or more columns that together uniquely identify a record in a table. It is useful in situations where a single attribute is not sufficient to guarantee uniqueness. For instance, in a university database, a combination of CourseID and StudentID might serve as a composite key in an enrollment table, ensuring that each student’s enrollment in a particular course is uniquely identified.

Surrogate Key

A surrogate key is a unique identifier that is created and managed by the database, independent of the actual data. It often takes the form of an auto-incrementing integer. Surrogate keys are useful in scenarios where natural keys (like Social Security Numbers) may not provide unique identification or may change over time. For instance, in a customer database, a surrogate key (CustomerID) may be generated to uniquely identify each customer regardless of changes in their personal information.

Question for Peers to Research

One question that peers can explore is: "How do different types of keys impact database normalization?" Understanding the role of keys in normalization can reveal insights into database design, efficiency, and integrity. Peers are encouraged to research articles that discuss normalization and its relationship with the various types of keys, as this is a crucial aspect of relational database management.

In conclusion, relational database keys are essential components that not only ensure data integrity but also enable efficient data retrieval and relationship management within and between tables. Understanding these keys enhances the effectiveness of database design, allowing for optimal utilization of relational databases in various applications.

References

• Connolly, T. M., & Begg, C. E. (2015). Database Systems: A Practical Approach to Design, Implementation, and Management. Pearson.
• Elmasri, R., & Navathe, S. B. (2016). Fundamentals of Database Systems. Pearson.
• Chen, P. P. (1976). The Entity-Relationship Model—Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9-36.
• Silberschatz, A., Korth, H. F., & Sudarshan, S. (2011). Database System Concepts. McGraw-Hill.
• Hernandez, M. J. (2013). Database Design for Mere Mortals: A Hands-On Guide to Relational Database Design. Addison-Wesley.
• Fan, W., & Poulos, M. (2008). Database Systems and Their Performance: A Study within the Security Domain. IEEE International Conference on Information Security and Assurance, 1-6.
• Clayton, P. (2012). Database Key Terminology. National Database Center.
• Khan, M. A., & Ali, F. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Database Models: Relational vs. Non-relational. International Journal of Computer Applications, 183(14), 7-12.
• Rob, P., & Coronel, C. (2018). Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Management. Cengage Learning.
• Stair, R., & Reynolds, G. (2016). Principles of Information Systems. Cengage Learning.