Dawn And David Are Researchers Who Have Been Examining Morta

Dawn And David Are Researchers Who Have Been Examining Mortality Data

Dawn and David are researchers who have been examining mortality data for the top ten causes of death, nationwide. They have been reviewing mortality reports from the Center for Disease Control database and are interested in determining whether or not causes of death differ between males and females for each of four geographic regions (North, South, Midwest, West). You will need the “Causes of Death” data file to analyze in creation of your Research Paper. Remember that you will need to conduct a literature review regarding causes of death, and related to your research questions.

Based upon the data set provided, please answer the following questions in the discussion section of your Research Paper: 1) What are the research hypothesis(es) and what type research question does it represent (descriptive, relationship, difference)? State each of the corresponding null hypotheses. 2) What is the independent variable? What are the dependent variables? 3) Construct a FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION, based upon the data set provided. 4) Compute the mean number of “unintentional injury” deaths for females and for males. 5) Which inferential statistic is MOST appropriate to determine whether males and females differed along the research conditions? Based upon either accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis: 6) Is there a difference between males and females for each of the top ten causes of death?

Paper For Above instruction

The investigation conducted by Dawn and David focuses on analyzing mortality data to understand differences in causes of death across gender and geographic regions. The central aim is to determine whether causes of death vary between males and females within specific regions, which requires formulating testable hypotheses, selecting appropriate statistical methods, and interpreting the results in a meaningful context.

Research Hypotheses and Questions

The primary research question revolves around understanding if there are statistically significant differences between male and female mortality rates for each of the top ten causes of death across different regions. The hypotheses are structured as follows:

• Null hypothesis (H0): There is no difference in the cause-specific mortality rates between males and females within each region.
• Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significant difference in the cause-specific mortality rates between males and females within each region.

This research question represents a comparison-oriented (difference) type, seeking to identify gender-based disparities in causes of death within geographic regions. It involves analyzing categorical data and testing for differences rather than describing associations or merely reporting distributions.

Independent and Dependent Variables

The independent variable in this study is the gender of the individuals, classified as male or female. The key dependent variables include the count or rate of deaths from each of the top ten causes of death, which are considered in the analysis to identify any differences by gender and region.

Frequency Distribution Construction

Constructing a frequency distribution entails tabulating the number of deaths categorized by causes of death, gender, and geographic region. This process involves tallying the number of cases within each category to observe the distribution pattern across variables. For example, the frequency distribution for deaths due to unintentional injuries might reveal the number of male and female deaths in each region, thereby illustrating potential disparities or clustering patterns.

Calculating Mean Number of Unintentional Injury Deaths

To compare mortality burdens between genders, the mean number of deaths attributable to unintentional injuries for males and females must be calculated. Suppose, for instance, the dataset indicates the death counts from unintentional injuries for each subgroup. The mean is computed as the sum of all deaths in each gender group divided by the number of observations or regions, providing an average that facilitates comparison across groups.

Appropriate Inferential Statistical Method

Given the aim to compare gender differences in cause-specific death counts, the most suitable inferential statistic would be an independent samples t-test if the data meet parametric assumptions or a non-parametric alternative such as the Mann-Whitney U test if assumptions are violated. These tests evaluate whether the mean death counts differ significantly between males and females for each cause of death within each region.

Assessing Differences for Each Cause of Death

Applying the selected statistical test to each of the top ten causes of death will determine if statistically significant gender differences exist. Based on the comparison outcomes, we can accept or reject the null hypothesis for each cause, thereby identifying causes where gender disparities are notable. If the p-value obtained from the tests is less than the significance level (commonly 0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating a significant difference exists between males and females.

Conclusion

The comprehensive analysis combining hypotheses formulation, descriptive and inferential statistics, and interpretative evaluation offers insights into gender and regional disparities in mortality. Such findings are vital for public health strategies aimed at targeted interventions to reduce preventable deaths and address underlying causes specific to different demographic groups.

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2022). Causes of Death Data. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/deaths.htm
• Hofmann, C., & Kallus, K. (2019). Statistical Methods in Health Data Analysis. Journal of Health Statistics, 14(2), 115-130.
• National Institute of Health. (2021). Mortality Data and Public Health Interventions. NIH Publication No. 21-3456.
• Everitt, B. (2010). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. Cambridge University Press.
• Whooley, M. A., & Avins, A. L. (2019). Designing Epidemiological Studies. In Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics (3rd ed., pp. 89-110). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Gerrard, M. (2020). Epidemiological Methods: Techniques and Applications. Springer.
• World Health Organization. (2020). Global Mortality Stratification. WHO Press. https://www.who.int/data/global-mortality
• Last, J. M. (2017). A Dictionary of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press.
• Blumberg, S. J., et al. (2018). Data Analysis for Public Health: Methods and Applications. Public Health Reports, 133(3), 250-262.
• Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.