Day 1: Identify Two Intended Outcomes Of Therapy Services

Day 1identifytwo Intended Outcomes Of The Therapy Services Offered At

Identify two intended outcomes of the therapy services offered at the People First organization. Then, describe an evidence-based instrument you could use to measure these outcomes. How would you use the tool to determine the extent to which the services are effective? What would you do if you learned the services were not as effective as hoped? How would the results influence your work as a leader in the organization?

Paper For Above instruction

The primary goal of therapy services at the People First organization is to enhance client well-being and functional independence. Among the intended outcomes are improved emotional stability and increased daily living skills. These outcomes aim to foster healthier mental states and enable clients to perform daily tasks more independently, significantly contributing to their overall quality of life.

To measure these outcomes effectively, an evidence-based instrument such as the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale could be employed. The GAF provides a numerical value to an individual's psychological, social, and occupational functioning on a continuum from mental health to mental illness (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). This standardized tool allows for consistent assessment over time and provides a comprehensive measure of a client’s progress or setbacks.

Using the GAF involves initial assessments at the start of therapy to establish baseline functioning levels. Subsequent assessments at regular intervals—such as every four weeks—can track changes in clients' functioning. A rise in GAF scores indicates improvements, suggesting that therapy is effective. Conversely, stagnant or declining scores may signal the need for modifications in the therapeutic approach.

If the evaluation reveals that therapy services are not as effective as intended, it is essential to perform a thorough review of the therapeutic strategies and client engagement levels. This might include seeking feedback from clients about their satisfaction and perceived progress, reviewing the specific interventions used, and considering alternative evidence-based methods. Implementing a multidisciplinary team review can help identify barriers to success and adapt treatment plans accordingly.

The results of these assessments significantly influence leadership decisions within the organization. Positive outcomes reinforce current practices and support continued investment in specific therapeutic approaches. Conversely, less favorable results prompt a critical review of program components, staff training, and resource allocation to improve effectiveness. As a leader, understanding these outcomes fosters accountability and ensures that services align with organizational missions and client needs, promoting a culture of continuous improvement.

In conclusion, selecting appropriate outcome measures like the GAF enables organizations such as People First to evaluate therapy effectiveness objectively. Regular assessment and responsive adjustments underpin service quality and client success. Leadership's role in responding to these outcomes ensures that therapy services are both effective and adaptable, ultimately enhancing organizational impact and client well-being.

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
• Craig, C. M., & Draper, L. (2019). Measuring therapeutic outcomes: Evidence-based approaches and tools. Journal of Mental Health Services, 45(2), 75-82.
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Irvine, A., & Whelan, T. (2020). Evaluation methods in mental health practice. Routledge.
• Jones, D., & Smith, P. (2018). Client-centered outcomes measurement in mental health. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 24(3), 161-172.
• Sara, M., & Lopez, E. (2021). Implementing evidence-based assessment tools in organizational settings. Mental Health Review Journal, 26(4), 289-302.
• Shaw, J., & Baker, G. (2017). Effectiveness of therapy interventions: Measurement and outcomes. Psychotherapy Research, 27(2), 184-195.
• Thompson, R. L., & Green, J. (2016). Leadership in mental health organizations: Application of outcome data. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 8, 1-10.
• Wong, S. C. Y., & Mak, W. W. S. (2019). Using standardized tools to monitor client progress in mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 46(4), 529-543.
• Zeidner, M., & Endler, N. S. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of stress and anxiety. Elsevier.